基于最大信息系数和近似马尔科夫毯的特征选择方法

孙广路; 宋智超; 刘金来; 朱素霞; 何勇军

doi:10.16383/j.aas.2017.c150851

基于最大信息系数和近似马尔科夫毯的特征选择方法

doi: 10.16383/j.aas.2017.c150851

孙广路^1,2, ,,
宋智超^1,2,,
刘金来^1,2,,
朱素霞^1,2,,
何勇军^1,2,

1.
哈尔滨理工大学计算机科学与技术学院哈尔滨 150080
2.
哈尔滨理工大学信息安全与智能技术研究中心哈尔滨 150080

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金 61502123

国家自然科学基金 60903083

黑龙江省新世纪人才项目 1155-ncet-008

详细信息

作者简介:
宋智超哈尔滨理工大学计算机科学与技术学院硕士研究生.主要研究方向为机器学习与特征选择.E-mail:chaozhisonghlg@163.com

刘金来哈尔滨理工大学计算机科学与技术学院硕士研究生.主要研究方向为机器学习与信息安全.E-mail:liujinlai678@163.com

朱素霞哈尔滨理工大学计算机科学与技术学院副教授.主要研究方向为cache一致性协议, 并发错误检测与并行计算.E-mail:zhusuxia@hrbust.edu.cn

何勇军哈尔滨理工大学计算机科学与技术学院副教授.主要研究方向为机器学习与模式识别.E-mail:holywit@163.com

通讯作者:
孙广路哈尔滨理工大学计算机科学与技术学院教授.主要研究方向为计算机网络与信息安全, 机器学习与智能信息处理.E-mail:guanglusun@163.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 3018
- HTML全文浏览量: 525
- PDF下载量: 1077
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-12-16
- 录用日期: 2016-10-09
- 刊出日期: 2017-05-01

Feature Selection Method Based on Maximum Information Coefficient and Approximate Markov Blanket

SUN Guang-Lu^{1,2
, ,},
SONG Zhi-Chao^{1,2
,},
LIU Jin-Lai^{1,2
,},
ZHU Su-Xia^{1,2
,},
HE Yong-Jun^{1,2
,}

1.
School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150080
2.
Research Center of Information Security and Intelligent Technology, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150080

Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61502123

National Natural Science Foundation of China 60903083

Research Fund for the Program of New Century Excellent Talents in Heilongjiang Provincial University 1155-ncet-008

More Information

Author Bio:
Master student at the School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin University of Science and Technology. His research interest covers machine learning and feature selection

Master student at the School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin University of Science and Technology. His research interest covers machine learning and information security

Associate professor at the School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin University of Science and Technology. Her research interest covers cache coherence protocol, concurrent bug detection, and parallel computing

Associate professor at the School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin University of Science and Technology. His research interest covers machine learning and pattern recognition

Corresponding author: SUN Guang-Lu Professor at the School of Computer Science and Technology, Harbin University of Science and Technology. His research interest covers computer network and information security, machine learning, and intelligent information processing. Corresponding author of this paper

摘要

摘要: 最大信息系数（Maximum information coefficient，MIC）可以对变量间的线性和非线性关系，以及非函数依赖关系进行有效度量.本文首先根据最大信息系数理论，提出了一种评价各维特征间以及每维特征与类别间相关性的度量标准，然后提出了基于新度量标准的近似马尔科夫毯特征选择方法，删除冗余特征.在此基础上提出了基于特征排序和近似马尔科夫毯的两阶段特征选择方法，分别对特征的相关性和冗余性进行分析，选择有效的特征子集.在UCI和ASU上的多个公开数据集上的对比实验表明，本文提出的方法总体优于快速相关滤波（Fast correlation-based filter，FCBF）方法，与ReliefF，FAST，Lasso和RFS方法相比也具有优势.
- 特征选择 /
- 最大信息系数 /
- 近似马尔科夫毯 /
- 特征相关性 /
- 特征冗余性
Abstract: Maximum information coefficient(MIC) is utilized to capture a wide range of associations between variables, including linear, non-linear and non-functional relationships. In this paper, firstly a measurement based on MIC is presented to measure relationships of features and classes in feature selection. Then the approximate Markov blanket with the proposed measurement is used to remove redundant features. A two-stage method based on feature ranking and approximate Markov blanket is further applied to select the feature subset by analyzing relevance and redundancy respectively. Experimental results on UCI and ASU open datasets show that the proposed method outperforms the fast correlation-based filter (FCBF) and gives better performance than ReliefF, FAST, Lasso and RFS.
- Feature selection /
- maximal information coefficient /
- approximate Markov blanket /
- feature relevance /
- feature redundancy

HTML全文

图 1 本文提出的特征选择方法总体框架

Fig. 1 The framework of the proposed feature selection method

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 六种特征选择方法在SMK-CAN数据集上的比较

Fig. 2 The comparison of six feature selection methods on the SMK-CAN dataset

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 六种特征选择方法在TOX-171数据集上的比较

Fig. 3 The comparison of six feature selection methods on the TOX-171 dataset

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 六种特征选择方法在PIE10P数据集上的比较

Fig. 4 The comparison of six feature selection methods on the PIE10P dataset

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 六种特征选择方法在ORL10P数据集上的比较

Fig. 5 The comparison of six feature selection methods on the ORL10P dataset

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 UCI数据集

Table 1 UCI datasets

数据集	特征总数	样本数	类别数
Spambase	57	4 601	2
Arrhythmia	452	279	16
Dermatology	34	366	6
Colon	2 000	62	2

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 两种特征选择方法选择的特征数

Table 2 The number of selected features in FCBF-MIC and FCBF

数据集	特征总数	FBCF-MIC	FCBF
Spambase	57	7.2	16.8
Arrhythmia	279	7.2	12.2
Dermatology	34	18.2	12.6
Colon	2 000	12.8	21

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 两种特征选择方法在UCI数据集上的实验结果(均值 $\pm$ 标准差%)

Table 3 The comparison of two feature selection methods on UCI datasets (Mean $\pm$ Std%)

数据集	NB			3NN			SVM
数据集	Full set	NB FCBF-MIC	FCBF	Full set	3NN FCBF-MIC	FCBF	Full set	SVM FCBF-MIC	FCBF
Spambase	79.93±0.30	86.93±2.15	78.60±2.34	87.55±1.47	89.43±0.51	87.8±2.05	90.11±0.62	90.15±0.98	90.24±0.88
Arrhythmia	61.17±3.81	62.66±3.91	65.84±3.83	57.5±3.72	65.04±4.62	62.13±3.96	61.87±3.98	65.49±3.64	64.07±3.33
Dermatology	96.06±1.00	97.16±1.27	96.27±0.91	95.08±1.51	95.63±0.84	95.52±0.64	96.61±1.27	96.83±0.40	95.85±0.74
Colon	80.00±3.76	83.02±2.89	83.06±3.29	78.07±4.56	77.42±5.67	76.87±3.08	78.71±3.29	83.87±2.04	83.23±3.76
Average	79.29	82.44	80.94	79.55	81.69	80.94	81.83	83.91	82.74

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 ASU数据集

Table 4 ASU datasets

数据集	特征总数	样本数	类别数
SMK-CAN	19 993	187	2
TOX-171	5 748	171	4
PIE10P	2 420	210	10
ORL10P	10 304	100	10

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 六种特征选择方法在NB上的比较(均值 $\pm$ 标准差%)

Table 5 The comparison of six feature selection methods on NB classification (Mean $\pm$ Std%)

数据集	FCBF-MIC	FCBF	ReliefF	FAST	Lasso	RFS
SMK-CAN	70.66±1.56	65.19±3.53	62.21±3.49	64.9±3.74	68.12±1.88	68.67±2.36
TOX-171	67.61±3.48	65.95 5.37	57.53±4.00	63.21±2.50	66.34±3.09	66.11±3.13
PIE10P	92.11±2.33	87.58±3.92	92.46±3.12	93.14±3.01	84.22±1.42	84.71±3.11
ORL10P	73.84±3.48	73.76±3.78	70.32±3.12	82.61±2.89	67.89±3.72	75.03±3.61
Average	76.06	73.12	70.63	75.97	71.64	73.63

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 六种特征选择方法在3NN上的比较(均值 $\pm$ 标准差%)

Table 6 The comparison of six feature selection methods on 3NN classification (Mean $\pm$ Std%)

数据集	FCBF-MIC	FCBF	ReliefF	FAST	Lasso	RFS
SMK-CAN	62.79±2.36	61.14±1.91	62.39±1.13	62.77±2.01	62.60±3.03	62.66±2.63
TOX-171	69.25±2.02	69.49±2.82	60.51±3.11	64.55±3.17	67.31±3.09	69.32±3.19
PIE10P	95.77±1.19	94.86±1.15	95.12±1.71	94.89±1.21	90.11±2.78	92.97±1.61
ORL10P	88.88±3.06	90.16±1.78	83.76±3.49	90.34±2.65	82.22±3.95	87.94±3.07
Average	79.17	78.91	78.14	75.45	75.56	78.22

下载: 导出CSV

表 7 六种特征选择方法在SVM上的比较(均值 $\pm$ 标准差%)

Table 7 The comparison of six feature selection methods on SVM classification (Mean $\pm$ Std%)

数据集	FCBF-MIC	FCBF	ReliefF	FAST	Lasso	RFS
SMK-CAN	68.28±1.60	65.26±2.31	67.27±1.33	68.04±1.47	67.81±1.54	68.04±1.78
TOX-171	69.26±2.13	69.44±5.35	61.76±1.19	65.16±3.33	69.30±2.12	70.12±3.31
PIE10P	97.56±1.24	95.35±0.51	95.21±0.97	96.38 1.56	95.27±1.17	95.58±1.21
ORL10P	82.08±5.32	76.08±2.66	75.24±2.46	81.84±3.01	78.80±5.55	82.56±4.60
Average	79.30	76.62	74.87	77.86	77.79	79.08

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(46)

[1]	Koller D, Sahami M. Toward optimal feature selection. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Machine Learning. Bari, Italy: Morgan Kaufmann, 1996. 284-292
[2]	Liu H, Motoda H. Feature Selection for Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Berlin: Springer Science and Business Media, 2012. 1-5
[3]	Bolón-Canedo V, Sánchez-Maroňo N, Alonso-Betanzos A. A review of feature selection methods on synthetic data. Knowledge and Information Systems, 2013, 34(3): 483-519 doi: 10.1007/s10115-012-0487-8
[4]	崔潇潇, 王贵锦, 林行刚.基于Adaboost权值更新以及K-L距离的特征选择算法.自动化学报, 2009, 35(5): 462-468 http://www.aas.net.cn/CN/abstract/abstract13753.shtml Cui Xiao-Xiao, Wang Gui-Jin, Lin Xing-Gang. Feature selection based on weight updating and K-L distance. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2009, 35(5): 462-468 http://www.aas.net.cn/CN/abstract/abstract13753.shtml
[5]	Yu L, Liu H. Feature selection for high-dimensional data: a fast correlation-based filter solution. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conferences on Machine Learning. Washington DC, USA: AAAI Press, 2003. 856-863
[6]	Lazar C, Taminau J, Meganck S, Steenhoff D, Coletta A, Molter C, de Schaetzen V, Duque R, Bersini H, Nowe A. A survey on filter techniques for feature selection in gene expression microarray analysis. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, 2012, 9(4): 1106-1119 doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2012.33
[7]	刘建伟, 李双成, 罗雄麟. p范数正则化支持向量机分类算法.自动化学报, 2012, 38(1): 76-87 http://www.aas.net.cn/CN/abstract/abstract17657.shtml Liu Jian-Wei, Li Shuang-Cheng, Luo Xiong-Lin. Classification algorithm of support vector machine via p-norm regularization. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2012, 38(1): 76-87 http://www.aas.net.cn/CN/abstract/abstract17657.shtml
[8]	Li Z C, Liu J, Yang Y, Zhou X F, Lu H Q. Clustering-guided sparse structural learning for unsupervised feature selection. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2014, 26(9): 2138-2150 doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2013.65
[9]	刘峤, 秦志光, 陈伟, 张凤荔.基于零范数特征选择的支持向量机模型.自动化学报, 2011, 37(2): 252-256 http://www.aas.net.cn/CN/abstract/abstract17388.shtml Liu Qiao, Qin Zhi-Guang, Chen Wei, Zhang Feng-Li. Zero-norm penalized feature selection support vector machine. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2011, 37(2): 252-256 http://www.aas.net.cn/CN/abstract/abstract17388.shtml
[10]	Gheyas I A, Smith L S. Feature subset selection in large dimensionality domains. Pattern Recognition, 2010, 43(1): 5-13 doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2009.06.009
[11]	Feng D C, Chen F, Xu W L. Detecting local manifold structure for unsupervised feature selection. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2014, 40(10): 2253-2261 doi: 10.1016/S1874-1029(14)60362-1
[12]	Livni R, Lehavi D, Schein S, Nachlieli H. Vanishing component analysis. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning. Atlanta, USA: Microtome Publishing, 2013. 597-605
[13]	Liu H W, Sun J G, Liu L, Zhang H J. Feature selection with dynamic mutual information. Pattern Recognition, 2009, 42(7): 1330-1339 doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2008.10.028
[14]	Estévez P, Tesmer M, Perez C A, Zurada J M. Normalized mutual information feature selection. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2009, 20(2): 189-201 doi: 10.1109/TNN.2008.2005601
[15]	Dash M, Liu H. Feature selection for classification. Intelligent Data Analysis, 1997, 1(1-4): 131-156 doi: 10.1016/S1088-467X(97)00008-5
[16]	Kononenko I. Estimating attributes: analysis and extensions of RELIEF. In: Proceedings of the 1994 European Conference on Machine Learning. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1994. 171-182
[17]	Mitra P, Murthy C A, Pal S K. Unsupervised feature selection using feature similarity. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2002, 24(3): 301-312 doi: 10.1109/34.990133
[18]	Yang Y M, Pedersen J O. A comparative study on feature selection in text categorization. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Machine Learning. Nashville, Tennessee, USA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1997. 412-420
[19]	Xing E P, Jordan M I, Karp R M. Feature selection for high-dimensional genomic microarray data. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Machine Learning. Williams College, Williamstown, MA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2001. 601-608
[20]	Yu L, Liu H. Efficient feature selection via analysis of relevance and redundancy. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2004, 5: 1205-1224 http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.71.5055
[21]	Reshef D N, Reshef Y A, Finucane H K, Grossman S R, McVean G, Turnbaugh P J, Lander E S, Mitzenmacher M, Sabeti P C. Detecting novel associations in large data sets. Science, 2011, 334(6062): 1518-1524 doi: 10.1126/science.1205438
[22]	Kira K, Rendell L A. The feature selection problem: traditional methods and a new algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 10th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Massachusetts, USA: AAAI Press, 1992. 129-134
[23]	Forman G. An extensive empirical study of feature selection metrics for text classification. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2003, 3: 1289-1305 http://www.citeulike.org/user/markymaypo/article/1915886
[24]	Fleuret F. Fast binary feature selection with conditional mutual information. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2004, 5: 1531-1555 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220320537_Fast_Binary_Feature_Selection_with_Conditional_Mutual_Information
[25]	Yu L, Liu H. Redundancy based feature selection for microarray data. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. New York, USA: ACM, 2004. 737-742
[26]	Hall M A. Correlation-based feature selection for discrete and numeric class machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Machine Learning. Stanford, USA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2000. 359-366
[27]	Ding C, Peng H C. Minimum redundancy feature selection from microarray gene expression data. Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, 2005, 3(2): 185-205 doi: 10.1142/S0219720005001004
[28]	Peng H C, Long F H, Ding C. Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2005, 27(8): 1226-1238 doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2005.159
[29]	Seth S, Principe J C. Variable selection: a statistical dependence perspective. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications. Washington DC, USA: IEEE, 2010. 931-936
[30]	Vergara J R, Estévez P A. A review of feature selection methods based on mutual information. Neural Computing and Applications, 2014, 24(1): 175-186 doi: 10.1007/s00521-013-1368-0
[31]	崔自峰, 徐宝文, 张卫丰, 徐峻岭.一种近似Markov Blanket最优特征选择算法.计算机学报, 2007, 30(12): 2074-2081 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0254-4164.2007.12.002 Cui Zi-Feng, Xu Bao-Wen, Zhang Wei-Feng, Xu Jun-Ling. An approximate Markov blanket feature selection algorithm. Chinese Journal of Computers, 2007, 30(12): 2074-2081 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0254-4164.2007.12.002
[32]	Saeed M. Bernoulli mixture models for Markov blanket filtering and classification. In: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence. Hong Kong, China: IEEE, 2008. 77-91
[33]	Zhang Y, Ding C, Li T. A two-stage gene selection algorithm by combining ReliefF and mRMR. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering. Massachusetts, USA: IEEE, 2007. 164-171
[34]	Javed K, Babri H A, Saeed M. Feature selection based on class-dependent densities for high-dimensional binary data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2012, 24(3): 465-477 doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2010.263
[35]	Song Q B, Ni J J, Wang G T. A fast clustering-based feature subset selection algorithm for high-dimensional data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2013, 25(1): 1-14 doi: 10.1109/TKDE.2011.181
[36]	Ruiz R, Riquelme J C, Aguilar-Ruiz J S. Incremental wrapper-based gene selection from microarray data for cancer classification. Pattern Recognition, 2006, 39(12): 2383-2392 doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2005.11.001
[37]	de Souza R S, Maio U, Biffi V, Ciardi B. Robust PCA and MIC statistics of baryons in early minihaloes. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2013, 440(1): 240-248 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.440..240D
[38]	Liu H M, Rao N, Yang D, Yang L, Li Y, Ou F. A novel method for identifying SNP disease association based on maximal information coefficient. Genetics and Molecular Research, 2014, 13(4): 10863-10877 doi: 10.4238/2014.December.19.7
[39]	Mani-Varnosfaderani A, Ghaemmaghami M. Assessment of the orthogonality in two-dimensional separation systems using criteria defined by the maximal information coefficient. Journal of Chromatography A, 2015, 1415: 108-114 doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.08.049
[40]	Fayyad U M, Irani K B. Multi-interval discretization of continuous-valued attributes for classification learning. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Chambéry, France: Springer, 1993. 1022-1027
[41]	Lichman M. UCI machine learning repository [Online], available: http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml, November 10, 2015
[42]	Zhao Z, Morstatter F, Sharma S, Alelyani S, Anand A, Liu H. Advancing feature selection research. ASU Feature Selection Repository, 2010. 1-28
[43]	Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 1996, 58(1): 267-288 http://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1379242
[44]	Nie F P, Huang H, Cai X, Ding C. Efficient and robust feature selection via joint l₂, 1-norms minimization. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 23: 24th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: NIPS, 2010. 1813-1821
[45]	段洁, 胡清华, 张灵均, 钱宇华, 李德玉.基于邻域粗糙集的多标记分类特征选择算法.计算机研究与发展, 2015, 52(1): 56-65 doi: 10.7544/issn1000-1239.2015.20140544 Duan Jie, Hu Qing-Hua, Zhang Ling-Jun, Qian Yu-Hua, Li De-Yu. Feature selection for multi-label classification based on neighborhood rough sets. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 2015, 52(1): 56-65 doi: 10.7544/issn1000-1239.2015.20140544
[46]	Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G. The WEKA data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 2009, 11(1): 10-18 doi: 10.1145/1656274

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计

图(5) / 表(7)

计量

文章访问数: 3018
HTML全文浏览量: 525
PDF下载量: 1077
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

留言板

基于最大信息系数和近似马尔科夫毯的特征选择方法

doi: 10.16383/j.aas.2017.c150851

通讯作者:
孙广路哈尔滨理工大学计算机科学与技术学院教授.主要研究方向为计算机网络与信息安全, 机器学习与智能信息处理.E-mail:guanglusun@163.com

计量

Feature Selection Method Based on Maximum Information Coefficient and Approximate Markov Blanket

计量

目录

留言板

基于最大信息系数和近似马尔科夫毯的特征选择方法

doi: 10.16383/j.aas.2017.c150851

通讯作者: 孙广路 哈尔滨理工大学计算机科学与技术学院教授.主要研究方向为计算机网络与信息安全, 机器学习与智能信息处理.E-mail:guanglusun@163.com

计量

出版历程

Feature Selection Method Based on Maximum Information Coefficient and Approximate Markov Blanket

计量

出版历程

目录

通讯作者:
孙广路哈尔滨理工大学计算机科学与技术学院教授.主要研究方向为计算机网络与信息安全, 机器学习与智能信息处理.E-mail:guanglusun@163.com