基于孪生网络与多重通道融合的脱机笔迹鉴别

林超群; 王大寒; 肖顺鑫; 池雪可; 王驰明; 张煦尧; 朱顺痣

doi:10.16383/j.aas.c230777

基于孪生网络与多重通道融合的脱机笔迹鉴别

doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c230777

1.
厦门理工学院计算机与信息工程学院福建省模式识别与图像理解重点实验室厦门 361024
2.
中国科学院自动化研究所多模态人工智能系统全国重点实验室北京 100190

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(61773325, 62222609, 62076236), 福建省高校产学合作项目(2021H6035), 福建省技术创新重点攻关及产业化项目(2023XQ023), 福厦泉国家自主创新示范项目(2022FX4), 国家工信部高技术船舶专项子专题(CBG4N21-4-4), 福建省中青年教师教育科研项目(JAT231102)资助

详细信息

作者简介:
林超群：厦门理工学院计算机与信息工程学院硕士研究生. 主要研究方向为脱机笔迹鉴别. E-mail: lincq@stu.xmut.edu.cn

王大寒：厦门理工学院计算机与信息工程学院教授, 研究员. 2012年获中国科学院大学博士学位.主要研究方向为模式识别, 计算机视觉, 深度学习. 本文通信作者. E-mail: wangdh@xmut.edu.cn

肖顺鑫：厦门理工学院计算机与信息工程学院讲师. 2023年获福州大学博士学位. 主要研究方向为图神经网络, 表示学习, 生物信息计算, 可信人工智能. E-mail: xiaoshunxin.tj@gmail.com

池雪可：2022年获得厦门理工学院硕士学位. 主要研究方向为计算机视觉, 手写数学公式识别. E-mail: 13213834013@163.com

王驰明：厦门理工学院计算机与信息工程学院讲师. 2020年获厦门大学博士学位. 主要研究方向为船舶智能运维, 声振感知. E-mail: wangchiming009@163.com

张煦尧：中国科学院自动化研究所研究员. 2013年获中国科学院大学博士学位. 主要研究方向为模式识别, 机器学习和文字识别. E-mail: xyz@nlpr.ia.ac.cn

朱顺痣：厦门理工学院计算机与信息工程学院教授. 2007年获厦门大学博士学位. 主要研究方向为数据挖掘, 视频分析与处理, 信息推荐, 系统工程. E-mail: szzhu@xmut.edu.cn

中图分类号: Y
计量
- 文章访问数: 419
- HTML全文浏览量: 90
- PDF下载量: 98
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-12-18
- 录用日期: 2024-03-10
- 网络出版日期: 2024-03-27
- 刊出日期: 2024-08-22

Offline Handwriting Verification Based on Siamese Network and Multi-channel Fusion

1.
Fujian Key Laboratory of Pattern Recognition and Image Understanding, School of Computer and Information Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen 361024
2.
State Key Laboratory of Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190

Funds: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (61773325, 62222609, 62076236), Industry-University Cooperation Project of Fujian Science and Technology Department (2021H6035), Fujian Key Technological Innovation and Industrialization Projects (2023XQ023), Fu-Xia-Quan National Independent Innovation Demonstration Project (2022FX4), Type 2030 Green and Intelligent Ship in the Fujian Region (CBG4N21-4-4), and the Education and Scientific Research Projects for Middle-Aged and Young Teachers of Fujian Province (JAT231102)

More Information

Author Bio:
LIN Chao-Qun　Master student at the School of Computer and Information Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology. His main research interest is offline signature verification

WANG Da-Han　Professor and researcher at the School of Computer and Information Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology. He received his Ph.D. degree from the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2012. His research interest covers pattern recognition, computer vision, and deep learning. Corresponding author of this paper

XIAO Shun-Xin　　Lecturer at the School of Computer and Information Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology. He received his Ph.D. degree from Fuzhou University in 2023. His research interest covers graph neural networks, representation learning, bioinformatics computing, and trusted artificial intelligence

CHI Xue-Ke　Received her master degree from Xiamen University of Technology in 2022. Her research interest covers computer vision and handwritten mathematical formula recognition

WANG Chi-Ming　Lecturer at the School of Computer and Information Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology. He received his Ph.D. degree from Xiamen University in 2020. His research interest covers intelligent operation and maintenance of ships, sound and vibration perception

ZHANG Xu-Yao　Professor at the Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences. He received his Ph.D. degree from University of Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2013. His research interest covers pattern recognition, machine learning, and handwriting recognition

ZHU Shun-Zhi　Professor at the School of Computer and Information Engineering, Xiamen University of Technology. He received his Ph.D. degree from Xiamen University in 2007. His research interest covers data mining, video analysis and processing, information recommendation, and systems engineering

摘要

摘要: 脱机签名验证模型因其具有判断签名是否伪造的能力而备受关注. 当今大多数脱机签名验证模型可分为深度度量学习方法和双通道判别方法. 大部分深度度量学习方法利用孪生网络生成每张图片的细节特征向量, 采用欧氏距离法判断相似度, 但是欧氏距离仅考虑两个点之间的绝对距离, 而容易忽视点的方向、缩放的信息, 不会考虑数据之间的相关性, 因此无法捕获特征向量内部之间的关系; 而双通道判别方法在网络训练前就进行特征的判别, 更能判断不同图像的相似性, 但此时图像的细节特征不够清晰, 大量特征丢失. 针对双通道判别方法中特征消失过多的问题, 提出了一种面向独立于书写者场景的手写签名离线验证模型MCFFN (Multi-channel feature fusion network). 在 CEDAR、BHSig-B、BHSig-H 和 ChiSig 四个不同语言的签名数据集上测试了所提出的方法, 实验证明了所提方法的优势和潜力.
- 脱机手写签名验证 /
- 深度度量学习 /
- 孪生网络 /
- 通道融合 /
- ACMix
Abstract: The offline signature verification model has garnered considerable attention due to its ability to discern the authenticity of signatures. Presently, most offline signature verification models can be categorized into deep metric learning approaches and 2-channel discriminative methods. Most of deep metric learning methods use Siamese network to generate detailed feature vectors for each image, and the Euclidean distance method is used to determine the similarity. However, the Euclidean distance only considers the absolute distance between two points, and it is easy to overlook the direction and scaling information of points. The correlation between data will not be considered, so unable to capture relationships within feature vectors. On the other hand, 2-channel discriminative methods perform feature discrimination before the model training, enhancing the ability to determine the dissimilarity between different images. However, in this case, the fine details of the images are not sufficiently clear, resulting in a significant loss of features. Addressing the issue of excessive feature loss in 2-channel discriminative methods, this paper introduces a handwritten signature offline verification model designed for scenarios independent of the writer MCFFN (Multi-channel feature fusion network). The efficacy and potential of the proposed method were validated through experiments conducted on four distinct language signature datasets: CEDAR, BHSig-B, BHSig-H, and ChiSig. The experimental results affirm the advantages and potential of the proposed approach.
- Offline handwritten signature verification /
- deep metric learning /
- Siamese network /
- channel fusion /
- ACMix

HTML全文

图 1 孪生网络结构图

Fig. 1 Structure of Siamese network

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 双通道网络图

Fig. 2 Structure of 2-channel network

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 MCFFN结构图

Fig. 3 Structure of MCFFN

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 双重逆鉴别注意力模块

Fig. 4 Dual reverse forensic attention module

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 注意力特征图

Fig. 5 Attentional characteristics map

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 脱机签名验证数据集

Table 1 Offline signature verification dataset

数据集名称	语言	签名种类	图片数量	真实伪造样本比
CEDAR	英语	55	2624	24/24
BHSig-B	孟加拉语	100	5400	24/30
BHSig-H	印地语	160	8640	24/30
ChiSig	中文	102	10242	−/−

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 基于CEDAR数据集的对比实验 (%)

Table 2 Comparison on CEDAR dataset (%)

模型名称	FRR	FAR	ACC
SigNet (2017arXiv)	0	0	100.00
DeepHSV (2019ICDAR)	—	—	100.00
IDN (2019CVPR)	2.17	5.87	96.38
SDINet (2021AAAI)	3.42	0.73	98.25
2C2S (2023EAAI)	0	0	100.00
OURS	0	0	100.00

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 基于BHSig-B数据集的对比实验 (%)

Table 3 Comparison on BHSig-B dataset (%)

模型名称	FRR	FAR	ACC
SigNet (2017arXiv)	13.89	13.89	86.11
DeepHSV (2019ICDAR)	—	—	88.08
IDN (2019CVPR)	5.24	4.12	95.32
SDINet (2021AAAI)	7.86	3.30	94.42
SURDS (2022ICPR)	5.42	19.89	87.34
2C2S (2023EAAI)	8.11	5.37	93.25
TransOSV (2022ICME)	9.95	9.95	90.05
OURS	3.86	3.84	95.61

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 基于BHSig-H数据集的对比实验 (%)

Table 4 Comparison on BHSig-H dataset (%)

模型名称	FRR	FAR	ACC
SigNet (2017arXiv)	15.36	15.36	84.64
DeepHSV (2019ICDAR)	—	—	86.66
IDN (2019CVPR)	4.93	8.99	93.04
SDINet (2021AAAI)	3.77	6.24	95.00
SURDS (2022ICPR)	8.98	12.01	89.50
2C2S (2023EAAI)	9.98	8.66	90.68
TransOSV (2022ICME)	3.39	3.39	96.61
OURS	4.89	4.89	95.70

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 基于ChiSig数据集的消融实验 (%)

Table 5 Ablation experiment on ChiSig dataset (%)

模型名称	EER	TAR	ACC
InceptionResnet	6.60	28.10	93.60
SigNet	—	—	82.28
IDN (基线)	17.91	10.50	84.82
IDN (通道融合)	14.81	9.61	85.72
IDN (通道融合 + 注意力)	11.38	7.82	88.96
OURS (无反灰度图片, 无注意力)	11.78	32.49	88.09
OURS (无反灰度图片, 单注意力)	10.83	—	89.20
OURS (反灰度图片, 无注意力)	7.84	—	92.14
OURS	5.19	28.96	95.23

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 基于ChiSig数据集的主流参数 (%)

Table 6 Main parameters on ChiSig dataset (%)

模型名称	FRR	FAR	ACC
IDN	10.46	17.91	84.82
IDN (通道融合)	9.61	18.97	85.72
IDN (通道融合 + 注意力)	7.82	14.27	88.96
OURS (无反灰度图片, 无注意力)	21.91	17.26	88.09
OURS (无反灰度图片, 单注意力)	15.59	16.30	89.20
OURS (反灰度图片, 无注意力)	6.90	17.18	92.14
OURS	5.34	5.34	95.23

下载: 导出CSV

表 7 跨语言实验 (%)

Table 7 Cross-language test (%)

训练集	测试集
训练集	CEDAR	BHSig-B	BHSig-H	ChiSig
CEDAR	100.00	48.76	49.89	57.48
BHSig-B	64.86	95.61	82.79	63.71
BHSig-H	50.11	86.27	95.70	20.00
ChiSig	54.60	70.02	55.37	95.23

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(37)

[1]	Bromley J, Bentz J W, Bottou L, Guyon I, Lecun Y, Moore C, et al. Signature verification using a “Siamese” time delay neural network. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 1993, 7(4): 669−688 doi: 10.1142/S0218001493000339
[2]	Cpałka K, Zalasiński M, Rutkowski L. New method for the on-line signature verification based on horizontal partitioning. Pattern Recognition, 2014, 47(8): 2652−2661 doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2014.02.012
[3]	Xia X H, Song X Y, Luan F G, Zheng J G, Chen Z L, Ma X F. Discriminative feature selection for on-line signature verification. Pattern Recognition, 2018, 74: 422−433 doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2017.09.033
[4]	邹杰, 孙宝林, 於俊. 基于笔画特征的在线笔迹匹配算法. 自动化学报, 2016, 42(11): 1744−1757 Zou Jie, Sun Bao-Lin, Yu Jun. Online handwriting matching algorithm based on stroke features. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2016, 42(11): 1744−1757
[5]	Guerbai Y, Chibani Y, Hadjadji B. The effective use of the one-class SVM classifier for handwritten signature verification based on writer-independent parameters. Pattern Recognition, 2015, 48(1): 103−113 doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2014.07.016
[6]	Hu J, Chen Y B. Offline signature verification using real adaboost classifier combination of Pseudo-dynamic features. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition. Washington, USA: IEEE, 2013. 1345−1349
[7]	Kumar R, Sharma J D, Chanda B. Writer-independent off-line signature verification using surroundedness feature. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2012, 33(3): 301−308 doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2011.10.009
[8]	Hafemann L G, Oliveira L S, Sabourin R. Fixed-sized representation learning from offline handwritten signatures of different sizes. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition (IJDAR), 2018, 21(3): 219−232 doi: 10.1007/s10032-018-0301-6
[9]	Hafemann L G, Sabourin R, Oliveira L S. Learning features for offline handwritten signature verification using deep convolutional neural networks. Pattern Recognition, 2017, 70: 163−176 doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2017.05.012
[10]	Okawa M. Synergy of foreground-background images for feature extraction: Offline signature verification using Fisher vector with fused KAZE features. Pattern Recognition, 2018, 79: 480−489 doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2018.02.027
[11]	Xing Z J, Yin F, Wu Y C, Liu C L. Offline signature verification using convolution Siamese network. In: Proceedings of SPIE 10615, 9th International Conference on Graphic and Image Processing (ICGIP). Qingdao, China: SPIE, 2017. 415−423
[12]	Soleimani A, Araabi B N, Fouladi K. Deep multitask metric learning for offline signature verification. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2016, 80: 84−90 doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2016.05.023
[13]	Jain A K, Ross A, Prabhakar S. An introduction to biometric recognition. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2004, 14(1): 4−20
[14]	Kalera M K, Srihari S, Xu A H. Offline signature verification and identification using distance statistics. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 2004, 18(7): 1339−1360 doi: 10.1142/S0218001404003630
[15]	Ferrer M A, Alonso J B, Travieso C M. Offline geometric parameters for automatic signature verification using fixed-point arithmetic. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis And Machine Intelligence, 2005, 27(6): 993−997 doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2005.125
[16]	Pal S, Alaei A, Pal U, Blumenstein M. Performance of an off-line signature verification method based on texture features on a large Indic-script signature dataset. In: Proceedings of the 12th IAPR workshop on Document Analysis Systems (DAS). Santorini, Greece: IEEE, 2016. 72−77
[17]	Zhang P R, Jiang J J, Liu Y L, Jin L W. MSDS: A large-scale Chinese signature and token digit string dataset for handwriting verification. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Neural Information Processings Systems. New Orleans, USA: 2022. 36507−36519
[18]	Yan K H, Zhang Y, Tang H R, Ren C K, Zhang J, Wang G A, et al. Signature detection, restoration, and verification: A novel Chinese document signature forgery detection benchmark. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW). New Orleans, USA: IEEE, 2022. 5163−5172
[19]	Nagel R N, Rosenfeld A. Steps toward handwritten signature verification. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Pattern Recognition. 1973. 59−66
[20]	Herbst N M, Liu C N. Automatic signature verification based on accelerometry. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 1977, 21(3): 245−253 doi: 10.1147/rd.213.0245
[21]	刘成林, 刘迎建, 戴汝为. 基于多通道分解与匹配的笔迹鉴别研究. 自动化学报, 1997, 23(1): 56−63 Liu Cheng-Lin, Liu Ying-Jian, Dai Ru-Wei. Writer identification by multichannel decomposition and matching. Acta Automatica Sinica, 1997, 23(1): 56−63
[22]	朱勇, 谭铁牛, 王蕴红. 基于笔迹的身份鉴别. 自动化学报, 2001, 27(2): 229−234 Zhu Yong, Tan Tie-Niu, Wang Yun-Hong. Writer identification based on texture analysis. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2001, 27(2): 229−234
[23]	Dey S, Dutta A, Toledo J I, Ghosh S K, Llados J, Pal U. SigNet: Convolutional Siamese network for writer independent offline signature verification. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1707.02131, 2017.
[24]	Li C, Lin F, Wang Z Y, Yu G, Yuan L, Wang H Q. DeepHSV: User-independent offline signature verification using two-channel CNN. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR). Sydney, Australia: IEEE, 2019. 166−171
[25]	Wei P, Li H, Hu P. Inverse discriminative networks for handwritten signature verification. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Long Beach, USA: IEEE, 2019. 5764−5772
[26]	Li H, Wei P, Ma Z Y, Li C K, Zheng N N. Offline signature verification with transformers. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME). Taipei, China: IEEE, 2022. 1−6
[27]	Cairang X M, Zhaxi D J, Yang X L, Hou Y, Zhao Q J, Gao D G, et al. Learning generalisable representations for offline signature verification. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). Padua, Italy: IEEE, 2022. 1−7
[28]	Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez A N, et al. Attention is all you need. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Long Beach, USA: Curran Associates Inc., 2017. 6000−6010
[29]	Dosovitskiy A, Beyer L, Kolesnikov A, Weissenborn D, Zhai X H, Unterthiner T, et al. An image is worth 16×16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Representations. Austria: OpenReview.net, 2021.
[30]	Pan X R, Ge C J, Lu R, Song S J, Chen G F, Huang Z Y, et al. On the integration of self-attention and convolution. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). New Orleans, USA: IEEE, 2022. 815−825
[31]	Bromley J, Guyon I, LeCun Y, Säckinger E, Shah R. Signature verification using a “Siamese” time delay neural network. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Denver, Colorado: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1993. 737−744
[32]	Liu L, Huang L L, Yin F, Chen Y B. Offline signature verification using a region based deep metric learning network. Pattern Recognition, 2021, 118: Article No. 108009 doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2021.108009
[33]	Zagoruyko S, Komodakis N. Learning to compare image patches via convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Boston, USA: IEEE, 2015. 4353−4361
[34]	Bhattacharya I, Ghosh P, Biswas S. Offline signature verification using pixel matching technique. Procedia Technology, 2013, 10: 970−977 doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.445
[35]	Li H, Wei P, Hu P. Static-dynamic interaction networks for offline signature verification. In: Proceedings of the 35th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Vancouver, Canada: AAAI Press, 2021. 1893−1901
[36]	Chattopadhyay S, Manna S, Bhattacharya S, Pal U. SURDS: Self-supervised attention-guided reconstruction and dual triplet loss for writer independent offline signature verification. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR). Montreal, Canada: IEEE, 2022. 1600−1606
[37]	Ren J X, Xiong Y J, Zhan H J, Huang B. 2C2S: A two-channel and two-stream transformer based framework for offline signature verification. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2023, 118: Article No. 105639 doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105639