2.765

2022影响因子

(CJCR)

  • 中文核心
  • EI
  • 中国科技核心
  • Scopus
  • CSCD
  • 英国科学文摘

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

考虑动车组周转和到发线运用的高铁列车运行多计划协同调整

周敏 顾灏璇 董海荣 刘仁伟 刘瑄

周敏, 顾灏璇, 董海荣, 刘仁伟, 刘瑄. 考虑动车组周转和到发线运用的高铁列车运行多计划协同调整. 自动化学报, xxxx, xx(x): x−xx doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c230379
引用本文: 周敏, 顾灏璇, 董海荣, 刘仁伟, 刘瑄. 考虑动车组周转和到发线运用的高铁列车运行多计划协同调整. 自动化学报, xxxx, xx(x): x−xx doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c230379
Zhou Min, Gu Hao-Xuan, Dong Hai-Rong, Liu Ren-Wei, Liu Xuan. Multi-plan collaborative rescheduling of high-speed train operation considering the utilization of rolling stock and arrival and departure tracks. Acta Automatica Sinica, xxxx, xx(x): x−xx doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c230379
Citation: Zhou Min, Gu Hao-Xuan, Dong Hai-Rong, Liu Ren-Wei, Liu Xuan. Multi-plan collaborative rescheduling of high-speed train operation considering the utilization of rolling stock and arrival and departure tracks. Acta Automatica Sinica, xxxx, xx(x): x−xx doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c230379

考虑动车组周转和到发线运用的高铁列车运行多计划协同调整

doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c230379
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金 (No. 61925302, No. U2368204, No. 62103033)资助
详细信息
    作者简介:

    周敏:北京交通大学自动化与智能学院副教授. 2019年获得北京交通大学交通信息工程及控制博士学位. 主要研究方向为高铁智能优化与调度、人群应急管控. E-mail: zhmin@bjtu.edu.cn

    顾灏璇:北京交通大学自动化与智能学院硕士研究生. 主要研究方向为高铁智能优化与调度

    董海荣:北京交通大学自动化与智能学院教授. 主要研究方向为智能交通系统建模优化、自主感知与协同控制、人工智能等. 本文通信作者. E-mail: hrdong@bjtu.edu.cn

    刘仁伟:中国铁路北京局集团有限公司高级工程师. 主要研究方向为高铁行车调度与运输管理等

    刘瑄:北京交通大学自动化与智能学院博士研究生. 主要研究方向为列车速度曲线优化、智能调度等

Multi-Plan Collaborative Rescheduling of High-Speed Train Operation Considering the Utilization of Rolling Stock and Arrival and Departure Tracks

Funds: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61925302, No. U2368204, No. 62103033)
More Information
    Author Bio:

    ZHOU Min Associate Professor at the School of Automation and Intelligence, Beijing Jiaotong University. He obtained his Ph.D. degree in Traffic Information Engineering and Control from Beijing Jiaotong University in 2019. His main research areas include intelligent optimization and scheduling for high-speed railways, as well as crowd emergency management and control

    GU Hao-Xuan Master student at the School of Automation and Intelligence, Beijing Jiaotong University. His primary research focus is on intelligent optimization and scheduling for high-speed railways

    DONG Hai-Rong Professor at the School of Automation and Intelligence, Beijing Jiaotong University. Her main research areas include modeling and optimization of intelligent transportation systems, autonomous perception and cooperative control, and artificial intelligence. Corresponding author of this paper

    LIU Ren-Wei Senior Engineer at China Railway Beijing Group Co., Ltd. His main research interests include high-speed rail operation rescheduling and transportation management

    LIU Xuan Ph.D. student at the School of Automation and Intelligence, Beijing Jiaotong University. His main research interests include train speed profile optimization and intelligent rescheduling

  • 摘要: 随着我国高速铁路快速发展, “八纵八横”高铁路网加密成型, 呈现出运行环境复杂、行车密度高及长交路跨线运营等典型特征. 一旦遭受大风、红光带、接触网挂异物和设备故障等突发事件, 导致列车偏离运行计划, 进而影响到发线运用和动车组周转计划. 如何在调整运行图的同时保证动车组和到发线运用的可行性是提高列车运行调整效率的关键. 针对区间双向中断场景下到发线运用冲突和动车组接续计划失效问题, 采用取消列车、变更列车到发时刻、更换到发线、备用动车组接续等策略对运行图、动车组和到发线运用计划进行调整. 基于事件-活动网络建立考虑动车组接续和到发线运用的列车运行协同调整模型, 设计两阶段求解方法对模型求解. 运用京津城际实际数据对模型和方法进行仿真验证, 结果表明相比于“先到先服务”策略, 多计划协同调整策略能有效降低列车晚点时间. 与整体求解方法相比, 两阶段求解方法能够保证模型求得解的质量且有效提高模型求解效率.
  • 图  1  具有中断区间的双线线路

    Fig.  1  The double-line railway with disrupted section

    图  2  区间中断条件下的车站示意图

    Fig.  2  Diagram of station with disrupted section

    图  3  事件-活动网络

    Fig.  3  Event-Activity network

    图  4  到达列车与出发列车

    Fig.  4  Arriving and departing trains

    图  5  动车组接续示意图

    Fig.  5  rolling stock connection diagram

    图  6  调整后列车运行图

    Fig.  6  Rescheduled train timetable

    图  7  求解结果对比柱状图

    Fig.  7  Histogram of results

    图  8  求解时间

    Fig.  8  Solution time

    表  1  决策变量定义

    Table  1  Decision variables of the model formulation

    序号 决策变量 含义 类型
    1 $ x_{e} $ 事件e发生的实际时刻 整数
    2 $ y_{t} $ 列车是否被取消运行 0-1
    3 $ \varphi_{a} $ 列车停站活动a是否发生 0-1
    4 $ \lambda_{a} $ 两列车之间的顺序活动 0-1
    5 $ \theta_{t,\;s}^{p} $ 列车t在s站是否占用p股道 0-1
    6 $ \delta_{t_{e},\;t_{f}}^{p} $ 两列车是否占用相同到发线p 0-1
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  参数定义

    Table  2  Notations for the model formulation

    序号 参数 定义
    1 T 列车集合, t $ \in $ T
    2 S 车站集合, s $ \in $ S
    3 P 车站股道集合, p$ \in $ P
    4 E 事件集合, e$ \in $ E
    5 ${\rm{E}} _{origin}^{dep} $ 始发站列车的出发事件
    6 A 活动集合, a $ \in $ A
    7 $ {\rm{A}}_{rol} $ 动车组接续活动集合
    8 $ {\rm{t}}_{e} $ 与事件e相关联的列车
    9 $ {\rm{p}}_{e} $ 事件e计划发生时刻
    10 M 足够大的正整数
    11 $ \omega _{1} $, $ \omega _{2} $, $ \omega _{3} $ 目标函数惩罚系数
    12 ${\rm{L}}_{a} $ 活动a最小间隔时间
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  相关参数取值

    Table  3  Values of relative parameters

    序号 参数 取值
    1 列车最小停站时间${\rm{L}}_{a} $ 2 min
    2 同向列车最小到发间隔${\rm{L}}_{a} $ 3 min
    3 占用相同股道列车最小安全间隔${\rm{L}}_{a} $ 2 min
    4 动车组最小接续时间${\rm{L}}_{a} $ 15 min
    5 北京南站备用动车组 9 列
    6 滨海站备用动车组 3 列
    7 M 1 440 min
    8 $ \omega_{1} $ 1 000
    9 $ \omega_{2} $, $ \omega_{3} $ 1
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  调整后列车运行计划

    Table  4  The rescheduled train plans

    列车编号 始发时刻 终到时刻 停站方案 后续列车
    D1 06:21 07:17 51111511113 U3
    D2 06:26 07:29 51111711133 U5
    D3 07:01 08:04 51111711133 U6
    D4 07:07 07:45(07:37) 311117 U4
    D5 07:28 09:02(08:37) 311313(7)11133 U8
    D6 07:53 08:31(08:23) 311113 U7
    D7 08:31 10:03(09:41) 311113(7)13133 U9
    D8 09:03 10:33(10:06) 311113(7)11133 U11
    D9 09:08 09:46(09:38) 311113 U10
    D10 11:09(09:25) 12:42(10:28) 511113(5)11135 U16(-)
    D11 11:33(09:46) 12:11(10:16) 311113
    D12 11:00(09:57) 12:32(11:00) 7(5)11113(5)11135 -(U12)
    D13 11:03(10:16) 12:37(11:23) 3(5)1111511135 U13
    D14 11:09(10:52) 12:47(12:02) 7(5)11313(7)11(3)133 U14
    D15 11:41(11:30) 12:19(12:00) 5(3)11113
    U1 06:51 07:49(07:33) 424226 D10(D6)
    U2 06:58 07:46(07:28) 422226 D7
    U3 07:41 09:13(08:44) 44222422226 D13(D8)
    U4 08:28(08:25) 09:16(08:55) 422226 D14
    U5 08:30 11:18(09:33) 6422242224(2)6 D11
    U6 08:47(08:45) 11:26(09:55) 442224244(2)4(2)6 D15
    U7 09:32(09:30) 11:38(10:00) 424(2)24(2)4 -(D13)
    U8 09:43 11:47(10:53) 4422244(2)424(2)4
    U9 10:44 12:14(11:47) 42242422226
    U10 11:00(10:53) 11:50(11:23) 422226
    U11 11:29 13:03(12:39) 64222424226
    U12 12:26 13:56(13:29) 62242422226
    U13 12:57 14:31(13:52) 4222242(4)2226
    U14 13:14 14:42(14:09) 62222422226
    U15 13:32 14:28(14:14) 424226
    U16 14:19 15:49(15:22) 62222424226
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  不同中断场景下考虑不同策略的列车运行调整

    Table  5  Train reschedule considering different strategies under different interruption scenarios

    中断场景 策略 目标值 $ P^{o} $/% 求解时间/s 取消列车数量/列 列车总延误时间/s $ P^{d} $/%
    (9:20,1,100) 组合策略 13 080 2.35 159 0 12 905 2.37
    (9:20,1,100) FCFS 13 388 47.3 0 13 211
    (9:00,2,90) 组合策略 13 303 2.55 361 0 13 173 2.31
    (9:00,2,90) FCFS 13 642 73.8 0 13 478
    (10:00,4,60) 组合策略 7 821 0.06 17 0 7 671 0.33
    (10:00,4,60) FCFS 7 826 6.9 0 7 696
    (11:00,3,30) 组合策略 5 994 0.21 3 0 5 864 0.21
    (11:00,3,30) FCFS 6 007 2.7 0 5 876
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  6  各干扰场景下整体求解结果

    Table  6  Comparison of solution results under different weight coefficients

    中断场景 求解方法 目标值 求解时间/s 取消列车数量/列 总延误时间/min
    (9:20, 1, 100) 整体求解 12 382 4 180 0 12 362
    (9:00, 2, 90) 整体求解 12 453 5 304 0 12 269
    (10:00, 4, 60) 整体求解 7 510 53 0 7 395
    (11:00, 3, 30) 整体求解 5 896 5 0 5 786
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  7  不同权重系数下模型求解结果对比

    Table  7  The overall solution results under each interruption scenario

    $ \omega_{1} $ $ \omega_{2} $ $ \omega_{3} $ 目标值 取消列车数量/列 总延误时间/s 求解时间/s
    1 1 1 12 819 0 12 723 330
    1 10 1 127 865 0 12 767 425
    1 100 1 1 278 215 0 12 767 359.5
    1 1 000 1 12 796 015 0 12 795 314
    10 1 1 12 819 0 12 723 326
    100 1 1 12 819 0 12 723 319
    1 000 1 1 12 819 0 12 726 307
    1 1 10 17 214 3 17 064 251.8
    1 1 100 18 130 3 17 223 227
    1 1 1 000 25 463 3 19 585 605.7
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 宁滨, 董海荣, 郑伟, 等. 高速铁路运行控制与动态调度一体化的现状与展望. 自动化学报, 2019, 45(12): 2208−2217

    Ning Bin, Dong Hai-Rong, Zheng Wei, et al. Integration of Train Control and Online Rescheduling for High-speed Railways: Challenges and Future. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2019, 45(12): 2208−2217
    [2] 林鹏, 田宇, 袁志明, 等. 高速铁路信号系统运维分层架构模型研究. 自动化学报, 2022, 48(01): 152−161

    Lin Peng, Tian Yu, Yuan Zhi-Ming, et al. Operation and Maintenance of High-speed Railway Signaling System: Hierarchical Structure Model. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2022, 48(01): 152−161
    [3] 刘昊俣, 贺诗波, 陈积明. 数据驱动的高速铁路强风报警自适应解除策略. 自动化学报, 2019, 45(12): 2242−2250

    Liu Hao-Yu, He Shi-Bo, Chen Ji-Ming. Data-driven Adaptive Adjustment Strategy for Strong Wind Alarm in High-speed Railway. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2019, 45(12): 2242−2250
    [4] Zhou M, Dong H, Liu X, et al. Integrated timetable rescheduling for multidispatching sections of high-speed railways during large-scale disruptions. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 2021, 9(2): 366−375
    [5] Yongqiu Zhu, Rob M.P. Goverde. Dynamic and robust timetable rescheduling for uncertain railway disruptions. Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management, 2020, 15: 100196
    [6] Veelenturf L P, Kidd M P, Cacchiani V, et al. A railway timetable rescheduling approach for handling large-scale disruptions. Transportation Science, 2016, 50(03): 841−862 doi: 10.1287/trsc.2015.0618
    [7] Reynolds E, Maher S J. A data-driven, variable-speed model for the train timetable rescheduling problem. Computers & Operations Research, 2022, 142: 105719
    [8] Zhan S, Kroon L G, Zhao J, et al. A rolling horizon approach to the high speed train rescheduling problem in case of a partial segment blockage. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2016, 95: 32−61 doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2016.07.015
    [9] 吴兴堂, 杨明坤, 王洪伟, 等. 面向负载均衡的高铁路网列车开行方案优化方法. 自动化学报, 2022, 48(02): 492−503

    Wu Xing-Tang, Yang Ming-Kun, Wang Hong-Wei, et al. Load-balancing Oriented Line Plan Optimization for a High-speed Railway Network. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2022, 48(02): 492−503
    [10] Meng X, Wang Y, Xiang W, et al. An integrated model for train rescheduling and station track assignment. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 2021, 15: 17−30 doi: 10.1049/itr2.12001
    [11] Zhang H, Li S, Wang Y, et al. Collaborative real-time optimization strategy for train rescheduling and track emergency maintenance of high-speed railway: A Lagrangian relaxation-based decomposition algorithm. Omega, 2020, 102(5): 102371
    [12] Meng L, Zhou X. Simultaneous train rerouting and rescheduling on an N-track network: A model reformulation with network-based cumulative flow variables. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2014, 67: 208−234 doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2014.05.005
    [13] Lu G, Ning J, Liu X, et al. Train platforming and rescheduling with flexible interlocking mechanisms: An aggregate approach. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2022, 159: 102622 doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2022.102622
    [14] Lixing Yang, Jianguo Qi, Shukai Li, et al. Collaborative optimization for train scheduling and train stop planning on high-speed railways. Omega, 2016, 64: 57−76 doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2015.11.003
    [15] Huimin Zhang, Shukai Li, Yanhui Wang, et al. Real-time optimization strategy for single-track high-speed train rescheduling with disturbance uncertainties: A scenario-based chance-constrained model predictive control approach. Computers & Operations Research, 2021, 127: 105135
    [16] 彭其渊, 宁佳, 鲁工圆. 大型高铁客运站到发线运用调整模型及算法. 铁道学报, 2019, 41(01): 10−19 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2019.01.002

    Peng Qi-Yuan, Ning Jia, Lu Gong-Yuan. Model and Algorithm for Train Platform Scheme Rescheduling at Large High-speed Railway Station. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2019, 41(01): 10−19 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2019.01.002
    [17] Xuan Liu, Min Zhou, Hairong Dong, et al. ADMM-based joint rescheduling method for high-speed railway timetabling and platforming in case of uncertain perturbation. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2023, 152: 104150 doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2023.104150
    [18] Housheng Zhou, Jianguo Qi, Lixing Yang, et al. Joint optimization of train timetabling and rolling stock circulation planning: A novel flexible train composition mode. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2022, 162: 352−385 doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2022.06.007
    [19] Rowan Hoogervorst, Twan Dollevoet, Gábor Maróti, et al. A Variable Neighborhood Search heuristic for rolling stock rescheduling. EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, 2021, 10: 100032 doi: 10.1016/j.ejtl.2021.100032
    [20] Yihui Wang, Kangqi Zhao, Andrea D'Ariano, et al. Real-time integrated train rescheduling and rolling stock circulation planning for a metro line under disruptions. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2021, 152: 87−117 doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2021.08.003
    [21] 周晓昭, 张琦, 许伟, 等. 考虑动车组接续的列车运行图智能调整方法. 铁道学报, 2018, 40(08): 19−27 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2018.08.003

    Zhou Xiao-Zhao, Zhang Qi, Xu Wei, et al. Intelligent Adjustment Method for Train Operation Diagram with Consideration of Motor Train Set Connection. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2018, 40(08): 19−27 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8360.2018.08.003
    [22] 史峰, 魏堂建, 周文梁, 等. 考虑动车组周转和到发线运用的高速铁路列车运行图优化方法. 中国铁道科学, 2012, 33(02): 107−114 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4632.2012.02.19

    Shi Feng, Wei Tang-Jian, Zhou Wen-Liang, et al. Optimization Method for Train Diagram of High-Speed Railway Considering the Turnover of Multiple Units and the Utilization of Arrival-Departure Tracks. China Railway Science, 2012, 33(02): 107−114 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4632.2012.02.19
    [23] 史常庆. 基于动车组接续优化的高速铁路列车运行图调整研究[D]. 西南交通大学, 2015.

    Shi Chang-Qin. High-speed Railway Train Diagram Adjustment Based on Train-set Connection Optimization[D]. Southwest Jiaotong University, 2015.
    [24] 占曙光. 考虑动车组接续的高速铁路列车运行实时调整. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2020, 18(02): 1−9+38 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4747.2020.02.001

    Zhan Shu-Guang. Real-time High-Speed Train Rescheduling Considering the Multiple Units Connecting. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2020, 18(02): 1−9+38 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4747.2020.02.001
    [25] 石敏涵, 吕红霞, 倪少权, 等. 考虑要素协同的高铁列车运行图双层优化模型. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2022, 20(02): 125−135

    Shi Min-Han, Lv Hong-Xia, Ni Shao-Quan, et al. Bilevel Optimization Model for High-speed Railway Train Operation Diagram Considering Multifactor Cooperation. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2022, 20(02): 125−135
    [26] 王斌, 黄玲, 郑亚晶, 等. 动车组周转和到发线运用方案的综合优化研究. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2018, 18(03): 175−181

    Wang Bin, Huang Ling, Zheng Ya-Jing, et al. Comprehensive Optimization for Turnover of Multiple Units and Utilization of Arrival-departure Track. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2018, 18(03): 175−181
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  11
  • HTML全文浏览量:  6
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-06-18
  • 录用日期:  2023-11-19
  • 网络出版日期:  2024-07-22

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回