Perspectives on Optimal Setting Methods for Municipal Wastewater Treatment Processes
-
摘要: 城市污水处理过程优化运行的目标是保证出水水质达标, 降低运行成本. 为了实现该目标, 需要动态更新污水处理过程操作变量的最优设定值. 由于城市污水处理过程具有多变量、多冲突、多目标、多约束、动态、时变等特点, 如何设计精确的污水处理过程运行指标模型, 如何优化过程操作变量的最优设定值, 是实现城市污水处理过程优化运行亟待解决的难题. 本文梳理了城市污水处理过程优化设定方法的研究进展. 首先, 介绍了城市污水处理过程特性和过程优化设定问题; 其次, 分别概述了基于机理和基于数据驱动的城市污水处理过程运行指标建模方法; 然后, 分别讨论了城市污水处理过程单运行指标和多运行指标的操作变量设定值寻优算法; 最后, 展望了城市污水处理过程优化设定问题的未来研究方向.Abstract: In municipal wastewater treatment processes (MWWTPs), the object of optimal operation is to guarantee water quality standard and reduce operation cost. To achieve these goals, it is necessary to update the optimal set-point values of operation variables in MWWTPs in real time. However, the MWWTP is a complex system, which has multi-variables, multi-conflicts, multi-objectives, multi-constraints, dynamics and time-varying delays. Therefore, to realize the optimal operation of MWWTPs, two important problems are how to design the accurate operation indices models of MWWTPs and how to optimize the set-point values of operation variables. In this paper, some existing optimal setting methods of MWWTPs are reviewed. Firstly, the characteristics of MWWTPs and the optimal setting problem are introduced. Secondly, the mechanism-based and data-driven operation indices modeling methods of MWWTPs are described, respectively. Then, the optimization algorithms for single operation variables and multiple operation variables are given, respectively. Finally, some future work about the optimal setting methods of MWWTPs are discussed.
-
图 2 基于数据驱动的城市污水处理过程运行指标模型设计框架
Fig. 2 Data-driven based operation indices modeling framework of MWWTPs
图 3 城市污水处理过程操作变量设定值寻优算法设计框架
Fig. 3 Optimization algorithms designing framework for set-point values of operation variables in MWWTPs
表 1 基于机理的城市污水处理过程运行指标建模方法比较
Table 1 Comparison of mechanism-based operation indices modeling methods in MWWTPs
文献 过程运行指标 建模方法 是否实际应用 优缺点 Pallavhee等[31] 出水 COD、出水氨氮 ASM1 否 在工程设计、工艺改造、在线监测方面
有着广泛应用. 但是涉及反应过程复杂、
参数众多且辨识困难、模型阶次较高,
不易直接进行污水处理过程运行指标
的设计、优化和控制.Mannina等[32] 出水 COD、出水 TSS、出水总氮 ASM1、ASM2、GIUE 是 彭永臻等[33] 过程运行费用 活性污泥反应机理 否 El Shorbagy等[34] 脱氮过程能耗 ASM1 否 Sun等[35] 好氧池曝气能耗 ASM2 是 Chen等[36] 出水水质、能耗 ASM2d 否 Shen等[49] 出水水质 BSM1 否 适应于评价优化算法及控制策略.
但是忽略外界干扰因素, 难以准确
反映真实污水处理过程.Nopens等[50] 出水水质 BSM2 否 Maere等[51] 曝气能耗 BSM1 是 王藩等[52] 出水水质、能耗 BSM1 否 Sweetapple等[53] 出水水质、操作成本、温室气体排放 BSM2 否 Plósz[54] 出水水质 反硝化过程动力学 否 能够简单描述污水处理过程化学、
物理、生化机理, 但是难以保证
模型准确性.De Gussem等[55] 曝气能耗 流体动力学、ASM2d 是 Yang等[56] 出水水质、曝气能耗 流体动力学 是 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 基于数据驱动的城市污水处理过程运行指标建模方法比较
Table 2 Comparison of data-driven based operation indices modeling methods of MWWTPs
文献 过程运行指标 建模方法 是否实际应用 优缺点 Yoo等[63] 出水 BOD 主元分析方法 是 具有计算简单、快速的优点.
但是要建立表征因果关系的准确模型,
模型精度不够理想.Dürrenmatt等[64] 出水水质 最小二乘回归分析、随机树 是 Zeng等[65] 泵送能耗、泵送系统流量 混合整数非线性回归、贪婪电磁像算法 否 Filipe等[66] 泵送能耗 自回归分析 是 Asadi等[67] 出水水质、曝气能耗 聚类分析、多元自适应回归分析 是 Manu等[75] 出水水质 支持向量机、自适应模糊推理 否 有较强的非线性系统拟合能力.
但是仅包含单个过程运行指标,
难以反映污水处理全流程动态特性.Qiao等[76] 出水总磷 深度信念网络 否 Chen等[77] 出水水质 专家知识推理、反向传播神经网络 是 蒙西等[78] 出水 BOD 类脑模块化神经网络 否 王丽娟[79] 曝气能耗 神经网络、主元分析 否 Zhang等[80] 泵送能耗 神经网络 是 Torregrossa等[81] 泵送能耗 模糊逻辑 是 Qiao等[82] 曝气能耗、出水水质 模糊神经网络 否 利于评价全流程的污水处理过程,
便于优化多个操作变量的设定值.Zhang等[83] 每日能耗、出水水质 支持向量机、反向传播算法 否 韩红桂等[84] 曝气能耗、泵送能耗、出水水质 自适应回归核函数 否
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 城市污水处理过程单运行指标的操作变量设定值寻优算法比较
Table 3 Comparison of optimization algorithms for set-point values of operation variables with single operation indices in MWWTPs
文献 目标函数 约束条件 操作变量 优化方法 是否实际应用 优缺点 Amand等[86] 曝气能耗 无 硝态氮平均
日流量线性规划算法 否 算法计算过程简单,
容易实现. 但是仅涉及
单个操作变量, 难以用
于全流程优化运行.Martin等[87] 过程能耗 无 硝态氮 进化算法 否 Duzinkiewicz等[88] 曝气能耗、
泵送能耗无 溶解氧 遗传算法 否 Sharma等[89] 搅拌机能耗 无 搅拌机转速 进化算法 是 张平等[91] 曝气能耗 物料平衡方程、出水
氨氮、出水总氮溶解氧浓度、
污泥浓度混合遗传算法、惩罚
函数法、乘子法否 能够避免产生脱离现实
的解. 但是带约束条
件的优化设定问题的求
解更复杂、更困难.韩广等[92] 曝气能耗、
泵送能耗出水达标排放 溶解氧、硝态氮 梯度下降法、格朗日乘
子法、最大最小函数法否 许玉格等[93] 鼓风能耗、
泵送能耗出水达标排放 溶解氧、硝态氮 人工免疫算法 否 刘载文等[94] 鼓风能耗、
泵送能耗出水达标排放 溶解氧、硝态氮 遗传算法 否 Ruano等[95] 泵送能耗 出水 pH 值和出水氨氮 曝气流量、
内循环流量模糊逻辑推理 是
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 城市污水处理过程多运行指标的操作变量设定值寻优算法比较
Table 4 Comparison of optimization algorithms for set-point values of operation variables with multiple operation indices in MWWTPs
文献 目标函数 操作变量 优化方法 是否实际应用 优缺点 Qiao等[97] 系统能耗、出水水质 溶解氧、硝态氮 加权求和法、基于梯度的
自适应动态规划算法否 便于利用现有的成熟的优
化方法进行问题求解, 但
是难以实现多个互相矛盾
的过程运行指标之间的折衷.Vega等[98] 曝气能耗、泵送能耗、出水水质 溶解氧、硝态氮 加权求和法、序列
二次规划算法否 史雄伟等[99] 出水氨氮、出水BOD、
出水COD和运行成本溶解氧、硝态氮 加权求和法、粒子群算法 否 Schlüter等[100] 过程操作性能、经济成本 冷凝器冷却流量、
外回流量动态加权求和、蚁群算法 否 Yetilmezsoy等[101] 甲烷速率、出水基质
浓度、净运营成本底物利用率 动态加权求和、非
线性规划算法是 Hakanen等[105] 系统能耗、出水水质 溶解氧、硝态氮 多目标优化算法 是 能够同时产生多个非支配
解. 但是当污水处理过程
入水负荷、入水组分浓度、
微生物活性等发生波动时,
算法搜索效率降低.Reifsnyder等[106] 曝气能耗、出水水质 手动阀开度 多准则优化算法 是 杨壮等[107] 系统能耗、出水水质 溶解氧、硝态氮 基于分解的多目标进化算法 否 Hreiz等[108] 运行成本、氮排放量 溶解氧、硝态氮 基于精英选择的多目标遗传算法 是 Zhang等[83] 出水水质、系统能耗 溶解氧、硝态氮 反向传播算法、多
目标优化方法否 能够实现操作变量设定值
的动态寻优. 但是环境剧
烈变化时, 算法寻优结果不理想.Egea等[109] 系统能耗、出水水质 曝气罐曝气系数、
内循环流量基于散点搜索的多目标优化 否 Qiao等[110] 曝气能耗、泵送能耗、出水水质 溶解氧、硝态氮 自适应多目标差分进化算法 否 De Faria等[111] 出水质量、运营成本、环境影响 外加碳源、
外加药品多目标进化算法 否
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] Habib R Z, Thiemann T, Al Kendi R. Microplastics and wastewater treatment plants—A review. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 2020, 12(1): 1−35 doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2020.121001 [2] 生态环境部. 2017中国生态环境状况公报 [Online], 获取自: http://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk15/201912/t20191231_754132.html, 2020年7月10日 [3] Lu J Y, Wang X M, Liu H Q, Yu H Q, Li W W. Optimizing operation of municipal wastewater treatment plants in China: The remaining barriers and future implications. Environment International, 2019, 129: 273−278 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.057 [4] Ben W W, Zhu B, Yuan X J, Zhang Y, Yang M, Qiang Z M. Occurrence, removal and risk of organic micropollutants in wastewater treatment plants across China: Comparison of wastewater treatment processes. Water Research, 2018, 130: 38−46 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.11.057 [5] He Y, Zhu Y S, Chen J H, Huang M S, Wang P, Wang G H, et al. Assessment of energy consumption of municipal wastewater treatment plants in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 228: 399−404 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.320 [6] 张安龙, 谢飞, 罗清, 王先宝, 马蕊, 程丙军, 等. 中国城镇污水处理厂节能降耗研究进展. 环境科学与技术, 2018, 41(S1): 116−119Zhang An-Long, Xie Fei, Luo Qing, Wang Xian-Bao, Ma Rui, Cheng Bing-Jun, et al. Research progress on energy saving and consumption reduction of urban sewage treatment plant in China. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 41(S1): 116−119 [7] 乔俊飞, 薄迎春, 韩广. 基于ESN的多指标DHP控制策略在污水处理过程中的应用. 自动化学报, 2013, 39(7): 1146−1151Qiao Jun-Fei, Bo Ying-Chun, Han Guang. Application of ESN-based multi indices dual heuristic dynamic programming on wastewater treatment process. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2013, 39(7): 1146−1151 [8] Longo S, Hospido A, Lema J M, Mauricio-Iglesias M. A systematic methodology for the robust quantification of energy efficiency at wastewater treatment plants featuring data envelopment analysis. Water Research, 2018, 141: 317−328 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.04.067 [9] 水资源-能源关系: 机遇与挑战 [Online], 获取自: http://www.tanpaifang.com/tanguwen/2014/0619/33887.html, 2020年7月10日 [10] 能源战略2050. [Online], 获取自: https://www.docin.com/p-1690461385.html, 2020年7月10日 [11] Rivera-Jaimes J A, Postigo C, Melgoza-Alemán R M, Aceña J, Barceló D, de Alda M L. Study of pharmaceuticals in surface and wastewater from Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico: Occurrence and environmental risk assessment. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 613−614: 1263−1274 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.134 [12] Hreiz R, Latifi M A, Roche N. Optimal design and operation of activated sludge processes: State-of-the-art. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 281: 900−920 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.06.125 [13] Ostace G S, Baeza J A, Guerrero J, Guisasola A, Cristea V M, Agachi P Ş, et al. Development and economic assessment of different WWTP control strategies for optimal simultaneous removal of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2013, 53: 164−177 [14] Han H G, Liu Z, Hou Y, Qiao J F. Data-driven multiobjective predictive control for wastewater treatment process. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2020, 16(4): 2767−2775 doi: 10.1109/TII.2019.2940663 [15] 彭永臻, 郭建华. 活性污泥膨胀机理、成因及控制. 北京: 科学出版社, 2012. 62−73Peng Yong-Zhen, Guo Jian-Hua. Mechanism, Cause and Control of Activated Sludge Bulking. Beijing: Science Press, 2012. 62−73 [16] Gómez-Brandón M, Podmirseg S M. Biological waste treatment. Waste Management & Research: The Journal for A Sustainable Circular Economy, 2013, 31(8): 773−774 [17] Balakrishnan S, Eckenfelder W W. Nitrogen relationships in biological treatment processes-IIII. Denitrification in the modified activated sludge process. Water Research, 1969, 3(3): 177−178, IN1, 179-188 doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(69)90057-8 [18] Rosen C, Lennox J A. Multivariate and multiscale monitoring of wastewater treatment operation. Water Research, 2001, 35(14): 3402−3410 doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00069-0 [19] Henze M, Gujer W, Mino T, Matsuo T, Wentzel M C, Marais G R, et al. Activated sludge model no.2D, ASM2D. Water science and Technology, 1999, 39(1): 165−182 doi: 10.2166/wst.1999.0036 [20] Jordan M A, Welsh D T, Teasdale P R, Catterall K, John R. A ferricyanide-mediated activated sludge bioassay for fast determination of the biochemical oxygen demand of wastewaters. Water Research, 2010, 44(20): 5981−5988 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.07.042 [21] Gustaf O, Bob N. Wastewater wreatment systems: Modelling diagnosis and control. Magazine of the International Water Association, 1999, 2: 43−44 [22] Lin C K, Katayama Y, Hosomi M, Murakami A, Okada M. The characteristics of the bacterial community structure and population dynamics for phosphorus removal in SBR activated sludge processes. Water Research, 2003, 37(12): 2944−2952 doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00568-7 [23] Ni B J, Yuan Z G. Recent advances in mathematical modeling of nitrous oxides emissions from wastewater treatment processes. Water Research, 2015, 87: 336−346 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.09.049 [24] 乔俊飞, 卢超, 王磊, 韩红桂. 城市污水处理过程模型研究综述. 信息与控制, 2018, 47(2): 129−139Qiao Jun-Fei, Lu Chao, Wang Lei, Han Hong-Gui. Models of urban wastewater treatment process: An overview. Information and Control, 2018, 47(2): 129−139 [25] 于广平, 苑明哲, 王宏. 活性污泥法污水处理数学模型的发展和应用. 信息与控制, 2006, 35(5): 614−618, 623 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0411.2006.05.014Yu Guang-Ping, Fan Ming-Zhe, Wang Hong. Development and application of activated sludge mathematical models for wastewater treatment process. Information and Control, 2006, 35(5): 614−618, 623 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0411.2006.05.014 [26] Gernaey K V, Rosen C, Jeppsson U. WWTP dynamic disturbance modelling -an essential module for long-term benchmarking development. Water Science and Technology, 2006, 53(4−5): 225−234 doi: 10.2166/wst.2006.127 [27] Phuc B D H, You S S, Hung B M, Kim H S. Robust control synthesis for the activated sludge process. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 2018, 4(7): 992−1001 [28] Henze M, Grady C P L, Gujer W, Marais G V R, Matsuo T. Activated Sludge Model No. 1, Technical Report No. 1, IAWPRC, 1987. 195−214 [29] Henze M, Gujer W, Mino T. Activated Sludge Model No. 2. International Association on Water Pollution Research and Control Scientific and Technical Reports, 1995, 31(2): 1−11 doi: 10.2166/wst.1995.0061 [30] Gujer W, Henze M, Mino T, van Loosdrecht M. Activated sludge model no. 3. Water Science & Technology, 1999, 39(1): 183−193 [31] Pallavhee T, Sundaramoorthy S, Sivasankaran M A. Optimal control of small size single tank activated sludge process with regulated aeration and external carbon addition. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2018, 57(46): 15811−15823 [32] Mannina G, Cosenza A, Viviani G. Uncertainty assessment of a model for biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal: Application to a large wastewater treatment plant. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 2012, 42−44: 61−69 doi: 10.1016/j.pce.2011.04.008 [33] 彭永臻, 王宝贞, 王淑莹. 活性污泥法的多变量最优控制I. 基础理论与DO浓度对运行费用的影响. 环境科学学报, 1998, 18(1): 11−19 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2468.1998.01.002Peng Yong-Zhen, Wang Bao-Zhen, Wang Shu-Ying. Multivariable optimal control of activated sludge process: I. Basic theory and effect of DO on operational cost. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 1998, 18(1): 11−19 doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2468.1998.01.002 [34] El Shorbagy W E, Radif N N, Droste R L. Optimization of A.2O BNR processes using ASM and EAWAG Bio-P models: Model performance. Water Environment Research, 2013, 85(12): 2271−2284 doi: 10.2175/106143013X13596524517102 [35] Sun J Y, Liang P, Yan X X, Zuo K C, Xiao K, Xia J L, et al. Reducing aeration energy consumption in a large-scale membrane bioreactor: Process simulation and engineering application. Water Research, 2016, 93: 205−213 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.02.026 [36] Chen W L, Lu X W, Yao C H. Optimal strategies evaluated by multi-objective optimization method for improving the performance of a novel cycle operating activated sludge process. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 260: 492−502 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.08.087 [37] 杜树新. 污水生化处理过程建模与控制. 控制理论与应用, 2002, 19(5): 660−666 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8152.2002.05.002Du Shu-Xin. Modeling and control of biological wastewater treatment processes. Control Theory & Applications, 2002, 19(5): 660−666 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8152.2002.05.002 [38] 董姗燕, 李咏梅, 池春榕, 刘祖文. 基于活性污泥数学模型(ASMs)的污水处理系统不确定性分析研究进展. 化工进展, 2017, 36(12): 4651−4657Dong Shan-Yan, Li Yong-Mei, Chi Chun-Rong, Liu Zu-Wen. Research and development on uncertainty analysis in wastewater treatment system based on activated sludge model(ASMs). Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2017, 36(12): 4651−4657 [39] Spinelli M, Eusebi A L, Vasilaki V, Katsou E, Frison N, Cingolani D, et al. Critical analyses of nitrous oxide emissions in a full scale activated sludge system treating low carbon-to-nitrogen ratio wastewater. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 190: 517−524 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.178 [40] Iacopozzi I, Innocenti V, Marsili-Libelli S, Giusti E. A modified activated sludge model no. 3 (ASM3) with two-step nitrification- denitrification. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2007, 22(6): 847−861 [41] Rieger L, Koch G, Kühni M, Gujer W, Siegrist H. The eawag Bio-P module for activated sludge model no. 3. Water Research, 2001, 35(16): 3887−3903 doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00110-5 [42] Zhao H, Hao O J, McAvoy T J. Approaches to modeling nutrient dynamics: ASM2, simplified model and neural nets. Water Science and Technology, 1999, 39(1): 227−234 doi: 10.2166/wst.1999.0048 [43] Jeppsson U, Alex J, Batstone D J, Benedetti L, Comas J, Copp J B, et al. Benchmark simulation models, quo vadis. Water Science & Technology, 2013, 68(1): 1−15 [44] Jeppsson U, Pons M N, Nopens I, Alex J, Copp J B, Gernaey K V, et al. Benchmark simulation model no 2: General protocol and exploratory case studies. Water Science & Technology, 2007, 56(8): 67−78 [45] Jeppsson U, Rosen C, Alex J, Copp J, Gernaey K V, Pons M N, et al. Towards a benchmark simulation model for plant-wide control strategy performance evaluation of WWTPs. Water Science & Technology, 2006, 53(1): 287−295 [46] Saagi R, Flores-Alsina X, Kroll S, Gernaey K V, Jeppsson U. A model library for simulation and benchmarking of integrated urban wastewater systems. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2017, 93: 282−295 [47] Rosen C, Jeppsson U, Vanrolleghem P A. Towards a common benchmark for long-term process control and monitoring performance evaluation. Water Science Technology, 2004, 50(11): 41−49 doi: 10.2166/wst.2004.0669 [48] Gernaey K V, Jørgensen S B. Benchmarking combined biological phosphorus and nitrogen removal wastewater treatment processes. Control Engineering Practice, 2004, 12(3): 357−373 doi: 10.1016/S0967-0661(03)00080-7 [49] Shen W H, Chen X Q, Corriou J P. Application of model predictive control to the BSM1 benchmark of wastewater treatment process. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2008, 32(12): 2849−2856 [50] Nopens I, Benedetti L, Jeppsson U, Pons M N, Alex J, Copp J B, et al. Benchmark simulation model no 2: Finalisation of plant layout and default control strategy. Water Science & Technology, 2010, 62(9): 1967−1974 [51] Maere T, Verrecht B, Moerenhout S, Judd S, Nopens I. BSM-MBR: A benchmark simulation model to compare control and operational strategies for membrane bioreactors. Water Research, 2011, 45(6): 2181−2190 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.01.006 [52] 王藩, 王小艺, 魏伟, 许继平, 蒋耘伟, 王灵宇. 基于BSM1的城市污水处理优化控制方案研究. 控制工程, 2015, 22(6): 1224−1229Wang Pan, Wang Xiao-Yi, Wei Wei, Xu Ji-Ping, Jiang Yun-Wei, Wang Ling-Yu. Optimal solution to wastewater treatment process control strategy based on benchmark model no. 1. Control Engineering of China, 2015, 22(6): 1224−1229 [53] Sweetapple C, Fu G T, Butler D. Multi-objective optimisation of wastewater treatment plant control to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Water Research, 2014, 55: 52−62 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.02.018 [54] Plósz B G. Optimization of the activated sludge anoxic reactor configuration as a means to control nutrient removal kinetically. Water Research, 2007, 41(8): 1763−1773 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.01.007 [55] De Gussem K, Fenu A, Wambecq T, Weemaes M. Energy saving on wastewater treatment plants through improved online control: Case study wastewater treatment plant antwerp-south. Water Science & Technology, 2014, 69(5): 1074−1079 [56] Yang Y, Yang J K, Zuo J L, Li Y, He S, Yang X, et al. Study on two operating conditions of a full-scale oxidation ditch for optimization of energy consumption and effluent quality by using CFD model. Water Research, 2011, 45(11): 3439−3452 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.04.007 [57] Andraka D. Reliability analysis of activated sludge process by means of biokinetic modelling and simulation results. Water, 2020, 12(1): Article No. 291 doi: 10.3390/w12010291 [58] Yang C L, Qiao J F, Wang L, Zhu X X. Dynamical regularized echo state network for time series prediction. Neural Computing and Applications, 2019, 31(10): 6781−6794 doi: 10.1007/s00521-018-3488-z [59] Corominas L, Garrido-Baserba M, Villez K, Olsson G, Cortés U, Poch M. Transforming data into knowledge for improved wastewater treatment operation: A critical review of techniques. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2018, 106: 89−103 [60] Lou I, Zhao Y C. Sludge bulking prediction using principle component regression and artificial neural network. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2012, 2012: Article No. 237693 [61] Newhart K B, Holloway R W, Hering A S, Cath T Y. Data-driven performance analyses of wastewater treatment plants: A review. Water Research, 2019, 157: 498−513 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.03.030 [62] Han H G, Zhu S G, Qiao J F, Guo M. Data-driven intelligent monitoring system for key variables in wastewater treatment process. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2018, 26(10): 2093−2101 doi: 10.1016/j.cjche.2018.03.027 [63] Yoo C K, Vanrolleghem P A, Lee I B. Nonlinear modeling and adaptive monitoring with fuzzy and multivariate statistical methods in biological wastewater treatment plants. Journal of Biotechnology, 2003, 105(1−2): 135−163 doi: 10.1016/S0168-1656(03)00168-8 [64] Dürrenmatt D J, Gujer W. Data-driven modeling approaches to support wastewater treatment plant operation. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2012, 30: 47−56 [65] Zeng Y H, Zhang Z J, Kusiak A, Tang F, Wei X P. Optimizing wastewater pumping system with data-driven models and a greedy electromagnetism-like algorithm. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2016, 30(4): 1263−1275 doi: 10.1007/s00477-015-1115-4 [66] Filipe J, Bessa R J, Reis M, Alves R, Póvoa P. Data-driven predictive energy optimization in a wastewater pumping station. Applied Energy, 2019, 252: Article No. 113423 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113423 [67] Asadi A, Verma A, Yang K, Mejabi B. Wastewater treatment aeration process optimization: A data mining approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 2017, 203: 630−639 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.047 [68] Huang W, Oh S K, Pedrycz W. Hybrid fuzzy wavelet neural networks architecture based on polynomial neural networks and fuzzy set/relation inference-based wavelet neurons. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2018, 29(8): 3452−3462 doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2017.2729589 [69] Kobayashi M. Decomposition of rotor hopfield neural networks using complex numbers. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2018, 29(4): 1366−1370 doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2017.2657781 [70] Kang Q, Shi L, Zhou M C, Wang X S, Wu Q D, Wei Z. A distance-based weighted undersampling scheme for support vector machines and its application to imbalanced classification. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2018, 29(9): 4152−4165 doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2017.2755595 [71] Gangopadhyay A, Chatterjee O, Chakrabartty S. Extended polynomial growth transforms for design and training of generalized support vector machines. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2018, 29(5): 1961−1974 doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2017.2690434 [72] Tanaka G, Nakane R, Takeuchi T, Yamane T, Nakano D, Katayama Y, et al. Spatially arranged sparse recurrent neural networks for energy efficient associative memory. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2020, 31(1): 24−38 doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2019.2899344 [73] Miller M W, Elliott M, DeArmond J, Kinyua M, Wett B, Murthy S, et al. Controlling the COD removal of an a-stage pilot study with instrumentation and automatic process control. Water Science & Technology, 2017, 75(11): 2669−2679 [74] Chen W C, Chang N B, Shieh W K. Advanced hybrid fuzzy-neural controller for industrial wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2001, 127(11): 1048−1059 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2001)127:11(1048) [75] Manu D S, Thalla A K. Artificial intelligence models for predicting the performance of biological wastewater treatment plant in the removal of kjeldahl nitrogen from wastewater. Applied Water Science, 2017, 7(7): 3783−3791 doi: 10.1007/s13201-017-0526-4 [76] Qiao J F, Wang G M, Li W J, Li X L. A deep belief network with PLSR for nonlinear system modeling. Neural Networks, 2018, 104: 68−79 doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2017.10.006 [77] Chen Z B, Nie S K, Ren N Q, Chen Z Q, Wang H C, Cui M H. Improving the efficiencies of simultaneous organic substance and nitrogen removal in a multi-stage loop membrane bioreactor-based PWWTP using an on-line knowledge-based expert system. Water Research, 2011, 45(16): 5266−5278 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.07.032 [78] 蒙西, 乔俊飞, 韩红桂. 基于类脑模块化神经网络的污水处理过程关键出水参数软测量. 自动化学报, 2019, 45(5): 906−919Meng Xi, Qiao Jun-Fei, Han Hong-Gui. Soft measurement of key effluent parameters in wastewater treatment process usings brain-like modular neural networks. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2019, 45(5): 906−919 [79] 王丽娟. 基于主元分析和神经网络的污水处理能耗分析. 计算机技术与发展, 2011, 21(3): 243−245 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-629X.2011.03.062Wang Li-Juan. Analysis of sewage treatment aeration energy consumption based on PCA and BP networks. Computer Technology and Development, 2011, 21(3): 243−245 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-629X.2011.03.062 [80] Zhang Z J, Kusiak A, Zeng Y H, Wei X P. Modeling and optimization of a wastewater pumping system with data-mining methods. Applied Energy, 2016, 164: 303−311 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.11.061 [81] Torregrossa D, Hansen J, Hernández-Sancho F, Cornelissen A, Schutz G, Leopold U. A data-driven methodology to support pump performance analysis and energy efficiency optimization in waste water treatment plants. Applied Energy, 2017, 208: 1430−1440 doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.012 [82] Qiao J F, Zhang W. Dynamic multi-objective optimization control for wastewater treatment process. Neural Computing and Applications, 2018, 29(11): 1261−1271 doi: 10.1007/s00521-016-2642-8 [83] Zhang R, Xie W M, Yu H Q, Li W W. Optimizing municipal wastewater treatment plants using an improved multi-objective optimization method. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 157: 161−165 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.103 [84] 韩红桂, 张璐, 乔俊飞. 基于多目标粒子群算法的污水处理智能优化控制. 化工学报, 2017, 68(4): 1474−1481Han Hong-Gui, Zhang Lu, Qiao Jun-Fei. Intelligent optimal control for wastewater treatment based on multi-objective particle swarm algorithm. CIESC Journal, 2017, 68(4): 1474−1481 [85] Santín I, Pedret C, Vilanova R. Applying variable dissolved oxygen set point in a two level hierarchical control structure to a wastewater treatment process. Journal of Process Control, 2015, 28: 40−55 doi: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2015.02.005 [86] Amand L, Carlsson B. Optimal aeration control in a nitrifying activated sludge process. Water Research, 2012, 46(7): 2101−2110 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.01.023 [87] Martín J M, Vega P, Revollar S. Set-point optimization for enhancing the MPC control of the n-removal process in WWTP’s. In: Proceedings of the 2012 World Automation Congress 2012. Puerto Vallarta, Mexico: IEEE, 2012. 1−6 [88] Duzinkiewicz K, Brdys M A, Kurek W, Piotrowski R. Genetic hybrid predictive controller for optimized dissolved-oxygen tracking at lower control level. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2009, 17(5): 1183−1192 doi: 10.1109/TCST.2008.2004499 [89] Sharma A K, Guildal T, Thomsen H R, Jacobsen B N. Energy savings by reduced mixing in aeration tanks: Results from a full scale investigation and long term implementation at avedoere wastewater treatment plant. Water Science & Technology, 2011, 64(5): 1089−1095 [90] Chachuat B, Roche N, Latifi M A. Optimal aeration control of industrial alternating activated sludge plants. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2005, 23(3): 277−289 doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2005.01.012 [91] 张平, 苑明哲, 王宏. 前置反硝化污水生化处理过程优化控制. 信息与控制, 2008, 37(1): 113−118 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0411.2008.01.019Zhang Ping, Yuan Ming-Zhe, Wang Hong. Optimization control for pre-denitrification type of biological treatment process for wastewater. Information and control, 2008, 37(1): 113−118 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0411.2008.01.019 [92] 韩广, 乔俊飞, 韩红桂, 柴伟. 基于Hopfield神经网络的污水处理过程优化控制. 控制与决策, 2014, 29(11): 2085−2088Han Guang, Qiao Jun-Fei, Han Hong-Gui, Chai Wei. Optimal control for wastewater treatment process based on Hopfield neural network. Control and Decision, 2014, 29(11): 2085−2088 [93] 许玉格, 宋亚龄, 罗飞, 张雍涛, 曹涛. 基于人工免疫算法的污水处理系统节能优化. 华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 41(8): 34−40Xu Yu-Ge, Song Ya-Ling, Luo Fei, Zhang Yong-Tao, Cao Tao. Energy-saving optimization of wastewater treatment system based on artificial immune algorithm. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2013, 41(8): 34−40 [94] 刘载文, 张春芝, 王小艺, 薛福霞, 程志强. 基于遗传算法的污水处理过程优化控制方法. 计算机与应用化学, 2007, 24(7): 959−962 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4160.2007.07.026Liu Zai-Wen, Zhang Chun-Zhi, Wang Xiao-Yi, Xue Fu-Xia, Cheng Zhi-Qiang. Method of optimal control for wastewater treatment process based on genetic algorithms. Computers and Applied Chemistry, 2007, 24(7): 959−962 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4160.2007.07.026 [95] Ruano M V, Ribes J, Seco A, Ferrer J. An advanced control strategy for biological nutrient removal in continuous systems based on pH and ORP sensors. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2012, 183: 212−221 doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.12.064 [96] Sadeghassadi M, Macnab C J B, Gopaluni B, Westwick D. Application of neural networks for optimal-setpoint design and MPC control in biological wastewater treatment. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2018, 115: 150−160 [97] Qiao J F, Bo Y C, Chai W, Han H G. Adaptive optimal control for a wastewater treatment plant based on a data-driven method. Water Science & Technology, 2013, 67(10): 2314−2320 [98] Vega P, Revollar S, Francisco M, Martín J M. Integration of set point optimization techniques into nonlinear MPC for improving the operation of WWTPs. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2014, 68: 78−95 [99] 史雄伟, 乔俊飞, 苑明哲. 基于改进粒子群优化算法的污水处理过程优化控制. 信息与控制, 2011, 40(5): 698−703Shi Xiong-Wei, Qiao Jun-Fei, Yuan Ming-Zhe. Optimal control for wastewater treatment process based on improved particle swarm optimization algorithm. Information and Control, 2011, 40(5): 698−703 [100] Schlüter M, Egea J A, Antelo L T, Alonso A A, Banga J R. An extended ant colony optimization algorithm for integrated process and control system design. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2009, 48(14): 6723−6738 [101] Yetilmezsoy K. Integration of kinetic modeling and desirability function approach for multi-objective optimization of UASB reactor treating poultry manure wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 118: 89−101 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.088 [102] Wu M Y, Li K, Kwong S, Zhang Q F, Zhang J. Learning to decompose: A paradigm for decomposition-based multiobjective optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2019, 23(3): 376−390 doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2018.2865931 [103] Flores-Alsina X, Arnell M, Amerlinck Y, Corominas L, Gernaey K V, Guo L S, et al. Balancing effluent quality, economic cost and greenhouse gas emissions during the evaluation of (plant-wide) control/operational strategies in WWTPs. Science of the Total Environment, 2014, 466−467: 616−624 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.046 [104] Cadet C, Béteau J F, Hernandez S C. Multicriteria control strategy for cost/quality compromise in wastewater treatment plants. Control Engineering Practice, 2004, 12(3): 335−347 doi: 10.1016/S0967-0661(03)00134-5 [105] Hakanen J, Sahlstedt K, Miettinen K. Wastewater treatment plant design and operation under multiple conflicting objective functions. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2013, 46: 240−249 [106] Reifsnyder S, Garrido-Baserba M, Cecconi F, Wong L, Ackman P, Melitas N, et al. Relationship between manual air valve positioning, water quality and energy usage in activated sludge processes. Water Research, 2020, 173: Article No. 115537 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115537 [107] 杨壮, 杨翠丽, 顾锞, 乔俊飞. 多目标进化算法的污水处理过程优化控制. 控制理论与应用, 2020, 37(1): 169−175 doi: 10.7641/CTA.2019.80408Yang Zhuang, Yang Cui-Li, Gu Ke, Qiao Jun-Fei. Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for wastewater treatment process optimization control. Control Theory & Applications, 2020, 37(1): 169−175 doi: 10.7641/CTA.2019.80408 [108] Hreiz R, Roche N, Benyahia B, Latifi M A. Multi-objective optimal control of small-size wastewater treatment plants. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2015, 102: 345−353 doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2015.06.039 [109] Egea J A, Gracia I. Dynamic multiobjective global optimization of a waste water treatment plant for nitrogen removal. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2012, 45(2): 374−379 doi: 10.3182/20120215-3-AT-3016.00066 [110] Qiao J F, Hou Y, Han H G. Optimal control for wastewater treatment process based on an adaptive multi-objective differential evolution algorithm. Neural Computing and Applications, 2017, 31(7): 2537−2550 [111] De Faria A B B, Ahmadi A, Tiruta-Barna L, Sperandio M. Feasibility of rigorous multi-objective optimization of wastewater management and treatment plants. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 2016, 115: 394−406 doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2016.09.005 [112] Han H G, Wu X L, Zhang L, Tian Y, Qiao J F. Self-organizing RBF neural network using an adaptive gradient multiobjective particle swarm optimization. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2019, 49(1): 69−82 doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2017.2764744 [113] Li F J, Qiao J F, Han H G, Yang C L. A self-organizing cascade neural network with random weights for nonlinear system modeling. Applied Soft Computing, 2016, 42: 184−193 doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.01.028 [114] Han H G, Qiao J F. A structure optimisation algorithm for feedforward neural network construction. Neurocomputing, 2013, 99: 347−357 doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2012.07.023 [115] Poch M, Comas J, Porro J, Garrido-Baserba M, Corominas L, Pijuan M. Where are we in wastewater treatment plants data management? A review and a proposal. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software: Bold Visions for Environmental Modeling. San Diego, USA: iEMSs, 2014. 221−234 [116] 李文静, 李萌, 乔俊飞. 基于互信息和自组织RBF神经网络的出水BOD软测量方法. 化工学报, 2019, 70(2): 687−695Li Wen-Jing, Li Meng, Qiao Jun-Fei. Effluent BOD soft measurement based on mutual information and self-organizing RBF neural network. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(2): 687−695 [117] Wilén B M, Liebana R, Persson F, Modin O, Hermansson M. The mechanisms of granulation of activated sludge in wastewater treatment, its optimization, and impact on effluent quality. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2018, 102(12): 5005−5020 doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-8990-9 [118] 李永明, 史旭东, 熊伟丽. 基于工况识别的污水处理过程多目标优化控制. 化工学报, 2019, 70(11): 4325−4336Li Yong-Ming, Shi Xu-Dong, Xiong Wei-Li. Condition recognition based intelligent multi-objective optimal control for wastewater treatment. CIESC Journal, 2019, 70(11): 4325−4336 [119] Aulinas M, Nieves J C, Cortés U, Poch M. Supporting decision making in urban wastewater systems using a knowledge-based approach. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2011, 26(5): 562−572 [120] Castillo A, Cheali P, Gómez V, Comas J, Poch M, S in, G. An integrated knowledge-based and optimization tool for the sustainable selection of wastewater treatment process concepts. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2016, 84: 177−192 [121] Rizzo D B, Blackburn M R. Harnessing expert knowledge: Defining Bayesian network model priors from expert knowledge only—prior elicitation for the vibration qualification problem. IEEE Systems Journal, 2019, 13(2): 1895−1905 doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2019.2892942 [122] Garrido-Baserba M, Reif R, Hernández F, Poch M. Implementation of a knowledge-based methodology in a decision support system for the design of suitable wastewater treatment process flow diagrams. Journal of Environmental Management, 2012, 112: 384−391 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.013 [123] Han H G, Zhang L, Liu H X, Yang C L, Qiao J F. Intelligent optimal control system with flexible objective functions and its applications in wastewater treatment process. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2019. DOI: 10.1109/TSMC.2019.2927631 [124] Azzouz R, Bechikh S, Said L B. A dynamic multi-objective evolutionary algorithm using a change severity-based adaptive population management strategy. Soft Computing, 2017, 21(4): 885−906 doi: 10.1007/s00500-015-1820-4 [125] Chen G Y, Li J H. A diversity ranking based evolutionary algorithm for multi-objective and many-objective optimization. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 2019, 48: 274−287 doi: 10.1016/j.swevo.2019.03.009 [126] Zhang S H, Wang J Y, Guo Z H. Research on combined model based on multi-objective optimization and application in time series forecast. Soft Computing, 2019, 23(22): 11493−11521 doi: 10.1007/s00500-018-03690-w [127] Barabasz B, Barrett S, Siwik L, Łoś M, Podsiadło K, Woźniak M. Speeding up multi-objective optimization of liquid fossil fuel reserve exploitation with parallel hybrid memory integration. Journal of Computational Science, 2019, 31: 126−136 doi: 10.1016/j.jocs.2019.01.001 [128] Singh H K, Isaacs A, Ray T. A Pareto corner search evolutionary algorithm and dimensionality reduction in many-objective optimization problems. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2011, 15(4): 539−556 doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2010.2093579 [129] Yang C L, Qiao J F, Ahmad Z, Nie K Z, Wang L. Online sequential echo state network with sparse RLS algorithm for time series prediction. Neural Networks, 2019, 118: 32−42 doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2019.05.006 [130] 乔俊飞, 韩改堂, 周红标. 基于知识的污水生化处理过程智能优化方法. 自动化学报, 2017, 43(6): 1038−1046Qiao Jun-Fei, Han Gai-Tang, Zhou Hong-Biao. Knowledge-based intelligent optimal control for wastewater biochemical treatment process. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2017, 43(6): 1038−1046 [131] 钱锋, 杜文莉, 钟伟民, 唐漾. 石油和化工行业智能优化制造若干问题及挑战. 自动化学报, 2017, 43(6): 893−901Qian Feng, Du Wen-Li, Zhong Wei-Min, Tang Yang. Problems and challenges of smart optimization manufacturing in petrochemical industries. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2017, 43(6): 893−901 [132] 桂卫华, 阳春华, 陈晓方, 王雅琳. 有色冶金过程建模与优化的若干问题及挑战. 自动化学报, 2013, 39(3): 197−207 doi: 10.1016/S1874-1029(13)60022-1Gui Wei-Hua, Yang Chun-Hua, Chen Xiao-Fang, Wang Ya-Lin. Modeling and optimization problems and challenges arising in nonferrous metallurgical processes. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2013, 39(3): 197−207 doi: 10.1016/S1874-1029(13)60022-1 [133] 柴天佑. 复杂工业过程运行优化与反馈控制. 自动化学报, 2013, 39(11): 1744−1757 doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1004.2013.01744Chai Tian-You. Operational optimization and feedback control for complex industrial processes. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2013, 39(11): 1744−1757 doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1004.2013.01744 -
图(3) / 表(4)
计量
- 文章访问数: 1399
- HTML全文浏览量: 386
- PDF下载量: 371
- 被引次数: 0
