复杂网络同步态与孤立节点解的关系

陈娟; 陆君安; 周进

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1004.2013.02111

复杂网络同步态与孤立节点解的关系

doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1004.2013.02111

1.
武汉科技大学理学院武汉 430081;
2.
武汉大学数学与统计学院武汉 430072

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金（11172215，61004096，61174028，61304164，61374173）资助

详细信息

作者简介:
陈娟博士，武汉科技大学理学院讲师. 主要研究方向为复杂网络，非线性系统，混沌控制与同步.E-mail：jc1204@126.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 2233
- HTML全文浏览量: 58
- PDF下载量: 1421
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2013-02-26
- 修回日期: 2013-08-01
- 刊出日期: 2013-12-20

On the Relationship between the Synchronous State and the Solution of an Isolated Node in a Complex Network

1.
College of Sciences, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081;
2.
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072

Funds:

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (11172215, 61004096, 61174028, 61304164, 61374173)

摘要

摘要: 复杂网络同步是复杂系统和复杂网络的前沿研究方向之一，已经取得很大的进展. 但是对于节点以耦合矩阵左特征向量加权平均态、孤立节点的解与网络的同步态之间具有什么关系，什么是网络的同步态和同步轨等基本问题仍然缺乏深入的研究，弄清楚这些问题对于复杂网络同步的理解和应用具有重要的意义. 本文采用数学分析方法证明，如果网络同步，则加权平均态 x = j=1Njxj可以定义为同步态，一般来说，x在正极限集的意义下，也就是孤立节点方程的解. 因此在实际应用中，把孤立节点方程的解s（t）与加权平均态x不加区别地对待是合理的. 同步态是不依赖于初始条件的通解，而同步轨是依赖于初始条件的特解. 对于混沌节点的网络，同步态应该理解为吸引子，而不是某一条轨道. 最后，本文还提供一些实例加以说明，并指出一些尚待解决的问题.
- 复杂网络 /
- 同步态 /
- 同步轨 /
- 孤立节点
Abstract: Synchronization is one of the frontier researches in complex systems and complex networks, which has been fruitfully exploited. However, further research is still necessary for some fundamental questions, such as the definitions of synchronous state and synchronous orbit of a dynamical network, relationships among the weighted mean state, the solution of the individual system and the synchronous state of the entire network. It is of great importance to address these issues so as to contribute to an integrated understanding and practical applications of synchronization in complex networks. In this paper, mathematical analysis is used to demonstrate that if a network synchronizes, the synchronous state can be defined as the weighted mean state x=j=1Njxj, which is the solution of the isolated system ????? in the sense of the positive limit set. Therefore, there is no difference between the solution of the individual system s(t) and the weighted mean state x in practice. Compared to the synchronous state which is a general solution independent of initial conditions, the synchronous orbit is a special solution related to initial conditions. As for networks coupled with chaotic systems, the synchronous state should be viewed as attractors, instead of a particular orbit. Finally, numerical simulations are provided to illustrate the effectiveness of our theoretical results, and some problems needed to be further studied are also included.
- Complex networks /
- synchronous state /
- synchronous orbit /
- isolated node

HTML全文

参考文献(28)

[1]	Watts D J, Strogatz S H. Collective dynamics of small-world network. Nature, 1998, 393(6684): 440-442
[2]	[2] Barabsi A L, Albert R. Emergence of SCAling in random networks. Science, 1999, 286(5439): 509-512
[3]	[3] Newman M E J. Models of the small world: a review. Journal of Statistical Physics, 2000, 101(3-4): 819-841
[4]	[4] Strogatz S H. Exploring complex networks. Nature, 2001, 410(6825): 268-276
[5]	[5] Albert R, Barabsi A L. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 2002, 74(1): 47-97
[6]	[6] Newman M E J. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 2003, 45(2): 167-256
[7]	Chen Guan-Rong. Problems and challenges in control theory under complex dynamical network environments. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2013, 39(4): 312-321 (陈关荣. 复杂动态网络环境下控制理论遇到的问题与挑战. 自动化学报, 2013, 39(4): 312-321)
[8]	[8] Pecora L M, Carroll T L. Synchronization in chaotic systems. Physical Review Letters, 1990, 64(8): 821-824
[9]	[9] Wu C W, Chua L O. Synchronization in an array of linearly coupled dynamical systems. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Fundamental Theory and Applications, 1995, 42(8): 430-447
[10]	Pecora L M, Carroll T L. Master stability functions for synchronized coupled systems. Physical Review Letters, 1998, 80(10): 2109-2112
[11]	Pecora L, Carroll T, Johnson G, Mar D, Fink K S. Synchronization stability in coupled oscillator arrays: solution for arbitrary configurations. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 2000, 10(2): 273-290
[12]	Wang X F, Chen G R. Synchronization in SCAle-free dynamical networks: robustness and fragility. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Fundamental Theory and Applications, 2002, 49(1): 54-62
[13]	Wang X F, Chen G R. Synchronization in small-world dynamical networks. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 2002, 12(1): 187-192
[14]	Motter A E, Zhou C S, Kurths J. Network synchronization, diffusion, and the paradox of heterogeneity. Physical Review E, 2005, 71(1): 016116
[15]	Nishikawa T, Motter A E. Maximum performance at minimum cost in network synchronization. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 2006, 224(1-2): 77-89
[16]	Wang Xiao-Fan, Li Xiang, Chen Guan-Rong. Theory and Application of Complex Networks. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2006. 194-240 (汪小帆, 李翔, 陈关荣. 复杂网络理论及其应用. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2006. 194-240)
[17]	Arenas A, Daz-Guilera A, Kurths J, Moreno Y, Zhou C S. Synchronization in complex networks. Physics Reports, 2008, 469(3): 93-153
[18]	Wu C W. Synchronization in Complex Networks of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company, 2007
[19]	Olfati-Saber R, Murray R M. Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2004, 49(9): 1520-1533
[20]	Wu C W. Synchronization in networks of nonlinear dynamical systems coupled via a directed graph. Nonlinearity, 2005, 18(3): 1057-1064
[21]	Lu W L, Chen T P. New approach to synchronization analysis of linearly coupled ordinary differential systems. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 2006, 213(2): 214-230
[22]	Zhou J, Lu J A, Lv J H. Adaptive synchronization of an uncertain complex dynamical network. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2006, 51(4): 652-656
[23]	Yu W W, DeLellis P, Chen G R, di Bernardo M, Kurths J. Distributed adaptive control of synchronization in complex networks. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2012, 57(8): 2153-2158
[24]	Yang X S, Cao J D, Lu J Q. Stochastic synchronization of complex networks with nonidentical nodes via hybrid adaptive and impulsive control. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 2012, 59(2): 371-384
[25]	Liu B, Lu W L, Chen T P. Synchronization in complex networks with stochastically switching coupling structures. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2012, 57(3): 754 -760
[26]	Drfler F, Bullo F. Synchronization and transient stability in power networks and nonuniform Kuramoto oscillators. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 2012, 50(3): 1616-1642
[27]	Winfree A T. The Geometry of Biological Time. New York: Springer Verlag, 2001
[28]	Khalil H K. Nonlinear Systems. London: Prentice Hall, 2002. 191-196