• 中文核心
  • EI
  • 中国科技核心
  • Scopus
  • CSCD
  • 英国科学文摘

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

受约束资源竞争的二阶惯性边流竞争模型: 守恒性、KKT平衡与有界优势集聚

黄毅 朱扬威 陈祖国 张志鑫 黄廷文

黄毅, 朱扬威, 陈祖国, 张志鑫, 黄廷文. 受约束资源竞争的二阶惯性边流竞争模型: 守恒性、KKT平衡与有界优势集聚. 自动化学报, xxxx, xx(x): x−xx doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c260212
引用本文: 黄毅, 朱扬威, 陈祖国, 张志鑫, 黄廷文. 受约束资源竞争的二阶惯性边流竞争模型: 守恒性、KKT平衡与有界优势集聚. 自动化学报, xxxx, xx(x): x−xx doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c260212
Huang Yi, Zhu Yang-Wei, Chen Zu-Guo, Zhang Zhi-Xin, Huang Ting-Wen. A second-order inertial edge-flow competition model for constrained resource competition: conservation, kkt equilibria, and bounded dominant concentration. Acta Automatica Sinica, xxxx, xx(x): x−xx doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c260212
Citation: Huang Yi, Zhu Yang-Wei, Chen Zu-Guo, Zhang Zhi-Xin, Huang Ting-Wen. A second-order inertial edge-flow competition model for constrained resource competition: conservation, kkt equilibria, and bounded dominant concentration. Acta Automatica Sinica, xxxx, xx(x): x−xx doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c260212

受约束资源竞争的二阶惯性边流竞争模型: 守恒性、KKT平衡与有界优势集聚

doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c260212 cstr: 32138.14.j.aas.c260212
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(62403193, 62373144), 湖南省科技创新项目(2025RC3197, 2024RC9015), 海南省自然科学基金项目(626MS0242, 626MS0243)资助
详细信息
    作者简介:

    黄毅:湖南科技大学信息与电气工程学院特聘副教授. 主要研究方向为复杂系统建模, 控制与优化, 强化学习. 本文通信作者. E-mail: yi.huang@hnust.edu.cn

    朱扬威:湖南科技大学信息与电气工程学院硕士研究生. 主要研究方向为建模与控制, 强化学习. E-mail: ywzhu2003@163.com

    陈祖国:湖南科技大学信息与电气工程学院副教授. 主要研究方向为人工智能, 机器人控制技术和复杂工业过程智能决策. E-mail: zg.chen@hnust.edu.cn

    张志鑫:华东交通大学电气与自动化工程学院讲师. 主要研究方向为非线性系统控制, 容错控制, 多智能体系统和瞬态性能约束控制. E-mail: zhixin.zhang@ecjtu.edu.cn

    黄廷文:深圳理工大学计算机科学与人工智能学院教授. 主要研究方向为神经网络, 复杂网络, 混沌与系统动力学, 算子半群理论及其应用. E-mail: huangtingwen@suat-sz.edu.cn

A Second-order Inertial Edge-flow Competition Model for Constrained Resource Competition: Conservation, KKT Equilibria, and Bounded Dominant Concentration

Funds: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (62403193, 62373144), Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province (2025RC3197, 2024RC9015), and Natural Science Foundation of Hainan Province (626MS0242, 626MS0243)
More Information
    Author Bio:

    HUANG Yi Distinguished associate professor at the School of Information and Electrical Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology. His research interests include complex systems modeling, control and optimization, and reinforcement learning. Corresponding author of this paper

    ZHU Yang-Wei Master student at the School of Information and Electrical Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology. His research interests include modeling and control, and reinforcement learning

    CHEN Zu-Guo Associate professor at the School of Information and Electrical Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology. His research interests include artificial intelligence, robot control technology, and intelligent decision-making for complex industrial processes

    ZHANG Zhi-Xin Lecturer at the School of Electrical and Automation Engineering, East China Jiaotong University. His research interests include nonlinear systems control, fault-tolerant control, multi-agent systems, and transient performance constrained control

    HUANG Ting-Wen Professor at the Faculty of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Shenzhen University of Advanced Technology. His research interests include neural networks, complex networks, chaos and dynamics of systems, and operator semigroups theory and its applications

  • 摘要: 针对现有一阶赢者通吃竞争模型难以同时刻画惯性效应、状态约束与严格优化解释, 本文研究资源总量守恒与箱体约束下的分布式非凸资源分配问题. 为此, 针对 Hill 型效用函数引入对数障碍正则化, 并以图边流动量为中间状态构建二阶惯性边流竞争模型. 所建模型能够利用局部边际效用信息实现分布式交互. 随后, 通过构造能量函数并运用 LaSalle 不变性原理, 证明可行内点集具有正不变性、系统能量单调耗散, 且系统轨迹收敛至平衡点集合. 在此基础上, 进一步建立动力学平衡点与正则化问题 KKT 条件之间的对应关系, 并证明当障碍参数趋于零且相关对偶变量保持有界时, 平衡点极限能够恢复原问题的 KKT 结构. 此外, 针对智能体处于 Hill 边际效用饱和区的情形, 给出能力参数与稳态资源分配之间的条件排序性质. 数值结果表明, 所建模型能够在保持约束的同时形成有界优势资源集聚. 其中, 惯性环节在收敛速度与峰值边流强度之间提供可调折中, 网络拓扑主要影响边际效用一致化速度, 而总资源规模则改变优势资源集聚强度.
  • 图  1  固定障碍参数下的状态演化与约束保持

    Fig.  1  State evolution and constraint preservation for a fixed barrier parameter

    图  2  固定障碍参数下的性能指标与收敛行为

    Fig.  2  Performance metrics and convergence behavior for a fixed barrier parameter

    图  3  障碍参数扫描下的平衡分配与乘子趋势

    Fig.  3  Equilibrium allocations and multiplier trends under a barrier-parameter sweep

    图  4  障碍参数趋零时的KKT残差验证

    Fig.  4  Verification of KKT residuals as the barrier parameter approaches zero

    表  1  初值与稳态资源分配对比($ \mu=0.02 $)

    Table  1  Comparison of initial and steady-state resource allocations ($ \mu=0.02 $)

    智能体$ i $能力参数$ c_i $初始资源$ x_i(0) $稳态资源$ x_i^\ast $
    11.000.410.060 9
    21.200.380.062 3
    31.450.320.227 3
    41.700.290.309 9
    52.000.270.366 7
    62.350.250.416 8
    72.700.240.458 0
    83.100.240.498 0
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  随机初始条件和模型参数扰动下的统计结果

    Table  3  Statistical results under random initial conditions and model-parameter perturbations

    扰动类型有效比例$ J(x^\ast) $$ t_s $峰值边流排序一致率
    随机初值1.00$ 7.452\,10\pm0.010\,11 $$ 1.97\pm0.28 $$ 0.332\,19\pm0.080\,14 $$ 1.000\pm0.000 $
    能力参数组1.00$ 7.437\,15\pm0.256\,18 $$ 2.78\pm1.07 $$ 0.355\,16\pm0.034\,15 $$ 1.000\pm0.000 $
    Hill参数1.00$ 7.256\,15\pm1.653\,11 $$ 2.87\pm1.30 $$ 0.336\,19\pm0.035\,19 $$ 1.000\pm0.000 $
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  $ \mu $扫描下的平衡与残差指标

    Table  2  Equilibrium and residual metrics under the $ \mu $ sweep

    $ \mu $$ \lambda^\ast(\mu) $$ \max|{\rm{stat}}| $$ \max|{\rm{comp}}| $$ \max|B^{{\rm{T}}} h_\mu| $$ \max(\mu_i^+,\mu_i^-) $
    0.082.960 625$ 6.61\times 10^{-10} $$ 8.0\times 10^{-2} $$ 8.17\times 10^{-10} $1.700 7
    0.042.809 298$ 9.16\times 10^{-10} $$ 4.0\times 10^{-2} $$ 1.31\times 10^{-9} $1.771 5
    0.022.742 712$ 1.45\times 10^{-9} $$ 2.0\times 10^{-2} $$ 2.29\times 10^{-9} $1.831 0
    0.012.710 407$ 6.44\times 10^{-9} $$ 1.0\times 10^{-2} $$ 1.07\times 10^{-8} $1.862 6
    0.0052.694 130$ 1.73\times 10^{-8} $$ 5.0\times 10^{-3} $$ 2.94\times 10^{-8} $1.878 3
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  一阶/二阶模型与阻尼参数比较

    Table  4  Comparison of the first- and second-order models under different damping parameters

    模型$ \alpha $$ J(x^\ast) $$ t_s $峰值边流强度
    一阶约化流07.447 9793.060
    二阶惯性流47.475 5092.780.487 5
    二阶惯性流87.447 9792.000.357 0
    二阶惯性流127.447 9794.120.279 5
    二阶惯性流207.447 9797.400.192 7
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  不同网络拓扑和随机边权的平衡与敏感度分析

    Table  5  Equilibrium and sensitivity analysis under different network topologies and random edge weights

    拓扑 $ J(x^\ast) $ $ t_s $ 活跃分量数 边际失配
    链式图 7.447979 35.04 1 $ 2.19\times 10^{-10} $
    环形图 7.447979 11.74 1 $ 3.04\times 10^{-9} $
    加边环形图 7.447979 2.00 1 $ 1.16\times 10^{-9} $
    完全图 7.447979 1.50 1 $ 6.04\times 10^{-9} $
    星形图 7.447979 6.32 1 $ 6.46\times 10^{-9} $
    随机边权加边环 7.447979 2.40 $ \pm $ 0.59 1 $ 1.73\times10^{-15} $
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  6  总资源变化对优势集聚结构的影响

    Table  6  Effect of total resource variation on the structure of advantageous resource concentration

    $ C_{{\rm{total}}} $$ J(x^\ast) $下边界节点数活跃节点数前3节点资源占比
    1.85.826 937080.690 1
    2.47.447 979080.572 0
    3.08.831 312080.516 9
    3.69.982 043080.474 7
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  7  20个智能体完全图稳态资源排序

    Table  7  Steady-state resource ranking for complete graph of 20 agents

    排名节点$ i $能力参数$ c_i $稳态资源$ x_i^\ast $
    1203.400 00.389 7
    2193.273 70.377 6
    3183.147 40.364 8
    4173.021 10.351 1
    5162.894 70.336 3
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Lotka A J. Elements of Physical Biology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1925.
    [2] Volterra V. Variations and Fluctuations in the Number of Individuals in Animal Species Living Together. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1927.
    [3] Grossberg S. Competition, decision, and consensus. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 1978, 66(2): 470−493 doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(78)90249-4
    [4] Hirsch M W. Systems of differential equations which are competitive or cooperative: I. Limit sets. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 1982, 13(2): 167−179 doi: 10.1137/0513013
    [5] Maass W. On the computational power of winner-take-all. Neural Computation, 2000, 12(11): 2519−2535 doi: 10.1162/089976600300014827
    [6] Maurer S M, Huberman B A. Competitive dynamics of web sites. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2003, 27(11-12): 2195−2206 doi: 10.1016/S0165-1889(02)00121-5
    [7] Noe T, Parker G. Winner take all: Competition, strategy, and the structure of returns in the internet economy. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2005, 14(1): 141−164 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.250371
    [8] Liu S B, Wang J. A simplified dual neural network for quadratic programming with its KWTA application. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 2006, 17(6): 1500−1510 doi: 10.1109/TNN.2006.881046
    [9] Liu Q S, Wang J. Two k-winners-take-all networks with discontinuous activation functions. Neural Networks, 2008, 21(2): 406−413 doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2007.12.044
    [10] Li S, Li Y M, Wang Z. A class of finite-time dual neural networks for solving quadratic programming problems and its k-winners-take-all application. Neural Networks, 2013, 39: 27−39 doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2012.12.009
    [11] 杨涛, 柴天佑. 分布式协同优化的研究现状与展望. 中国科学: 技术科学, 2020, 50(11): 1414−1425 doi: 10.1360/SST-2020-0040

    Yang Tao, Chai Tian-You. Research status and prospects of distributed collaborative optimization. SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences, 2020, 50(11): 1414−1425 doi: 10.1360/SST-2020-0040
    [12] Li S, Zhou M C, Luo X, You Z H. Distributed winner-take-all in dynamic networks. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2017, 62(2): 577−589 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2016.2578645
    [13] 陈刚, 李志勇. 集合约束下多智能体系统分布式固定时间优化控制. 自动化学报, 2022, 48(9): 2254−2264 doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c190416

    Chen Gang, Li Zhi-Yong. Distributed fixed-time optimization control for multi-agent systems with setconstraints. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2022, 48(9): 2254−2264 doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c190416
    [14] Zhang Y Y, Li S, Xu B, Yang Y. Analysis and design of a distributed k-winners-take-all model. Automatica, 2020, 115: Article No. 108868 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2020.108868
    [15] 时侠圣, 林志赟. 基于固定时间的二阶智能体分布式优化算法. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2023, 49(11): 2951−2959 doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0060

    Shi Xia-Sheng, Lin Zhi-Yun. Fixed-time distributed convex algorithm over second-order multi-agent systems under bounded disturbances. Journalof Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2023, 49(11): 2951−2959 doi: 10.13700/j.bh.1001-5965.2022.0060
    [16] Zhang Y, Li S, Weng J. Distributed k-winners-take-all network: An optimization perspective. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2023, 53(8): 5069−5081 doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2022.3170236
    [17] 吴庆涛, 朱军龙, 葛泉波, 张明川. 一种基于条件梯度的加速分布式在线学习算法. 自动化学报, 2024, 50(2): 386−402

    Wu Qing-Tao, Zhu Jun-Long, Ge Quan-Bo, Zhang Ming-Chuan. An accelerated distributed online learn-ing algorithm based on conditional gradient. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2024, 50(2): 386−402
    [18] 时侠圣, 孙长银, 穆朝絮. 扰动线性多智能体系统的分布式资源分配算法. 中国科学: 信息科学, 2024, 54(4): 911−926 doi: 10.1360/SSI-2023-0093

    Shi Xia-Sheng, Sun Chang-Yin, Mu Chao-Xu. Distributed resource allocation algorithms for linear multi-agent systems with disturbances. SCIENCE CHINA Information Sciences, 2024, 54(4): 911−926 doi: 10.1360/SSI-2023-0093
    [19] Huang Y, Fang W T, Chen Z Y, Li Y G, Yang C H. Flocking of multiagent systems with nonuniform and nonconvex input constraints. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2023, 68(7): 4329−4335 doi: 10.1109/tac.2022.3206117
    [20] Huang Y, Duan M M, Mo L P. Multiagent containment control with nonconvex states constraints, nonuniform time delays, and switching directed networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2019, 31(11): 5021−5028 doi: 10.1109/tnnls.2019.2955678
    [21] Chen Z Y. Winners take all: A reverse consensus model. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2409.12407, 2024.
    [22] Cao X W, Yang Y G, Li S, Stanimirović P S, Katsikis V N. A novel competition model for dynamic winner-take-all. International Journal of Systems Science, 2025. DOI: 10.1080/00207721.2025.2568717
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  16
  • HTML全文浏览量:  10
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2026-03-30
  • 录用日期:  2026-06-29
  • 网络出版日期:  2026-07-27

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回