分散式MPC经济性能评估

刘苏; 冯毅萍; 荣冈

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1004.2013.00548

分散式MPC经济性能评估

doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1004.2013.00548 cstr: 32138.14.SP.J.1004.2013.00548

1.
浙江大学工业控制技术国家重点实验室智能系统与控制研究所杭州 310027

详细信息

通讯作者:
荣冈

计量
- 文章访问数: 1886
- HTML全文浏览量: 73
- PDF下载量: 1266
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2012-05-13
- 修回日期: 2012-10-08
- 刊出日期: 2013-05-20

Economic Performance Assessment of Decentralized Model Predictive Control

1.
State Key Laboratory of Industrial Control Technology, Institute of Cyber-System and Control, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027

摘要

摘要: 近年来,学术界对集中式模型预测控制 (Model predictive control, MPC) 性能评估进行了广泛的研究. 对于大规模化工过程, 工业现场通常采用分散式MPC的控制结构. 由于各子系统间存在复杂的耦合关系, 针对集中式MPC 的性能评估方法不能客观反映分散式MPC的性能. 本文基于线性矩阵不等式(Linear matrix inequality, LMI)的方法对分散式MPC进行经济性能评估. 首先提出了一种迭代方法求解分散式线性二次型调节器(Linear quadratic regulator, LQR)问题, 该方法显著降低了已有求解方法的保守性. 再利用LQR基准建立了一组随机优化命题对MPC进行经济性能评估, 评估方法对集中式MPC与分散式MPC均适用, 评估结果可以指导MPC参数调整, 也可以为集中式与分散式MPC结构选择提供重要参考. 通过对重油分馏塔控制问题的仿真验证了本文方法的有效性与应用价值.
- 模型预测控制 /
- 经济性能评估 /
- 分散式控制 /
- 线性二次型调节器 /
- 线性矩阵不等式
Abstract: In recent years, performance assessment of centralized model predictive control (MPC) has attracted a lot of academic interest. In fact, large-scale complex chemical processes are usually controlled by decentralized MPC in the industrial field. Due to the complex interactions between subsystems, most performance assessment methods regarding centralized control structure cannot be applied to the performance assessment of decentralized MPC. In this paper, a linear matrix inequality (LMI) based approach is proposed to assess the economic performance of decentralized MPC. First, an iterative method is proposed to obtain the decentralized linear quadratic regulator (LQR) benchmark. A probabilistic optimization problem is then formulated to assess the economic performance of MPC. The proposed approach can be applied to assessment of both centralized MPC and decentralized MPC. The assessment result provides guidance for parameter tuning as well as control structure selection. The simulation result of Shell control problem shows the effectiveness of the proposed method.
- Model predictive control (MPC) /
- economic performance assessment /
- decentralized control /
- linear quadratic regulator (LQR) /
- linear matrix inequality (LMI)

HTML全文

参考文献(1)

[1]

Cui H, Jacobsen E W. Performance limitations in decentralized control. Journal of Process Control, 2002, 12(4): 485- 494[2] Scattolini R. Architectures for distributed and hierarchical model predictive control —— a review. Journal of Process Control, 2009, 19(5): 723-731[3] Stewart B T, Venkat A N, Rawlings J B, Wright S J, Pannocchia G. Cooperative distributed model predictive control. Systems Control Letters, 2010, 59(8): 460-469[4] Harris T J. Assessment of control loop performance. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1989, 67(5): 856-861[5] Huang B, Kadali R. Dynamic Modeling, Predictive Control and Performance Monitoring: A Data-driven Subspace Approach. Vol. 374. New York: Springer Verlag, 2008[6] Gao J P, Patwardhan R, Akamatsu K, Hashimoto Y, Emoto G, Shah S L, Huang B. Performance evaluation of two industrial MPC controllers. Control Engineering Practice, 2003, 11(12): 1371-1387[7] Yang M Y, Jin X M, Chen F. Performance assessment of model predictive control in industrial distillation column. In: Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation. Hangzhou, China: IEEE, 2004. 637-641[8] Huang B, Shah S L. Performance Assessment of Control Loops: Theory and Applications. New York: Springer Verlag, 1999[9] Shah S L, Patwardhan R, Huang B. Multivariate controller performance analysis: methods, applications and challenges. AIChE Symposium Series, New York, USA, 2002. 190-207[10] Shah S L, Mitchell W, Shook D. Challenges in the detection, diagnosis and visualisation of controller performance data. Computing and Control Engineering Journal, 2005, 16(4): 30-34[11] Patwardhan R S, Shah S L, Qi K Z. Assessing the performance of model predictive controllers. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2002, 80(5): 954-966[12] Jain M, Lakshminarayanan S. Estimating performance enhancement with alternate control strategies for multiloop control systems. Chemical Engineering Science, 2007, 62(17): 4644-4658[13] Kariwala V, Forbes J F, Meadows E S. Minimum variance benchmark for decentralized controllers. In: Proceedings of the 2005 American Control Conference. Portland, OR, USA: IEEE, 2005. 1437-1442[14] Kariwala V. Fundamental limitation on achievable decentralized performance. Automatica, 2007, 43(10): 1849- 1854[15] De Oliveira M C, Geromel J C, Bernussou J. Extended H2 and H∞ norm characterizations and controller parametrizations for discrete-time systems. International Journal of Control, 2002, 75(9): 666-679[16] Geromel J C, Peres P L D. Decentralized load-frequency control. IEE Proceedings D (Control Theory and Applications), 1985, 132(5): 225-230[17] Geromel J C, Bernussou J, Peres P L D. Decentralized control through parameter space optimization. Automatica, 1994, 30(10): 1565-1578[18] Zhao C, Zhao Y, Su H Y, Huang B. Economic performance assessment of advanced process control with LQG benchmarking. Journal of Process Control, 2009, 19(4): 557-569[19] Zhao C, Su H Y, Gu Y, Chu J. A pragmatic approach for assessing the economic performance of model predictive control systems and its industrial application. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2009, 17(2): 241-250[20] Xu Q L, Zhao C, Zhang D F, An A M, Zhang C. Data-driven LQG benchmarking for economic performance assessment of advanced process control system. In: Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference. San Francisco, CA, USA: AACC, 2011. 5085-5090[21] Xu F W, Huang B, Akande S. Performance assessment of model predictive control for variability and constraint tuning. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2007, 46(4): 1208-1219[22] Ying, C M, Joseph B. Performance and stability analysis of LP-MPC and QP-MPC cascade control systems. AIChE Journal, 1999, 45(7): 1521-1534

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计