Multiple Local Reconstruction Model-based Fault Diagnosis for Continuous Processes
-
摘要: 为了提高故障诊断性能, 本文对故障特征随时间发展变化的多样性进行了探讨分析. 本文揭示了故障过程呈现时变特性, 即故障过程在不同时段反映出不同的变量相关性, 提出了一种故障时段划分算法. 该算法将故障划分为不同时段, 在每一个时段中, 故障特征被认为是基本类似的. 在此基础上, 针对不同时段建立了不同的故障分解模型, 并揭示了不同故障状态与正常状态的关系. 通过划分不同故障特征, 可以区分不同的故障特征, 建立更精确的重构模型. 该方法很好地阐述了故障的演变行为特征, 能够更精确地进行故障重构从而确定故障原因. 通过在田纳西伊士曼仿真过程上的应用验证了该方法的可行性及诊断性能.Abstract: In the present work, the multiplicity of fault characteristics is proposed and analyzed to improve the fault diagnosis performance. It is based on the following recognition that the underlying fault characteristics in general do not stay constant but will present changes along the time direction. That is, the fault process reveals different variable correlations across different time periods. To analyze the multiplicity of fault characteristics, a fault division algorithm is developed to divide the fault process into multiple local time periods where the fault characteristics are deemed similar within the same local time period. Then a representative fault decomposition model is built in each local time period to reveal the relationships between the fault and normal operation status. In this way, these different fault characteristics can be modeled respectively. The proposed method gives an interesting insight into the fault evolvement behaviors and a more accurate from-fault-to-normal reconstruction result can be expected for fault diagnosis. The feasibility and performance of the proposed fault diagnosis method are illustrated with the Tennessee Eastman process.
-
[1] Hsu C C, Su C T. An adaptive forecast-based chart for non-Gaussian processes monitoring: with application to equipment malfunctions detection in a thermal power plant. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2011, 19(5): 1245-1250 [2] [2] Samara P A, Fouskitakis G N, Sakellariou J S, Fassois S D. A statistical method for the detection of sensor abrupt faults in aircraft control systems. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2008, 16(4): 789-798 [3] [3] Zhao C H, Wang F L, Lu N Y, Jia M X. Stage-based soft-transition multiple PCA modeling and on-line monitoring strategy for batch processes. Journal of Process Control, 2007, 17(9): 728-741 [4] [4] Qin S J. Statistical process monitoring: basics and beyond. Journal of Chemometrics, 2003, 17(8-9): 480-502 [5] [5] Qian C, Kruger U. Analysis of extended partial least squares for monitoring large-scale processes. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2005, 13(5): 807-813 [6] [6] Ayhan B, Mo Y C, Myung H S. Multiple discriminant analysis and neural-network-based monolith and partition fault-detection schemes for broken rotor bar in induction motors. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2006, 53(4): 1298-1308 [7] [7] Kruger U, Kumar S, Littler T. Improved principal component monitoring using the local approach. Automatica, 2007, 43(9): 1532-1542 [8] [8] Alcala C F, Qin S J. Reconstruction-based contribution for process monitoring. Automatica, 2009, 45(7): 1593-1600 [9] [9] Zhao C H, Wang F L, Gao F R, Lu N Y, Jia M X. Adaptive monitoring method for batch processes based on phase dissimilarity updating with limited modeling data. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2007, 46(14): 4943- 4953 [10] Zhao C H, Gao F R, Wang F L. Phase-based joint modeling and spectroscopy analysis for batch processes monitoring. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2010, 49(2): 669-681 [11] Wold S, Esbensen K, Geladi P. Principal component analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 1987, 2(1-3): 37-52 [12] Burnham A J, Viveros R, MacGregor J F. Frameworks for latent variable multivariate regression. Journal of Chemometrics, 1996, 10(1): 31-45 [13] Dayal B S, MacGregor J F. Improved PLS algorithms. Journal of Chemometrics, 1997, 11(1): 73-85 [14] Raich A, Cinar A. Statistical process monitoring and disturbance diagnosis in multivariable continuous processes. AIChE Journal, 1996, 42(4): 995-1009 [15] Yoon S, MacGregor J F. Fault diagnosis with multivariate statistical models part I: Using steady state fault signatures. Journal of Process Control, 2001, 11(4): 387-400 [16] Kano M, Hasebe S, Hashimoto I, Ohno H. Statistical process monitoring based on dissimilarity of process data. AIChE Journal, 2002, 48(6): 1231-1240 [17] Qin S J, Li W H. Detection and identification of faulty sensors in dynamic processes. AIChE Journal, 2001, 47(7): 1581 -1593 [18] Dunia R, Qin S J. Subspace approach to multidimensional fault identification and reconstruction. AIChE Journal, 1998, 44(8): 1813-1831 [19] Yue H H, Qin S J. Reconstruction-based fault identification using a combined index. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2001, 40(20): 4403-4414 [20] Valle S, Qin S J, Piovoso M J. Extracting fault subspaces for fault identification of a polyester film process. In: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE American Control Conference. Arlington, VA, USA: IEEE, 2001. 4466-4471 [21] Lieftucht D, Volker M, Sonntag C, Kruger U, Irwin G W, Engell S. Improved fault diagnosis in multivariate systems using regression-based reconstruction. Control Engineering Practice, 2009, 17(4): 478-493 [22] Gang L, Alcala C F, Qin S J, Zhou D H. Generalized reconstruction-based contributions for output-relevant fault diagnosis with application to the Tennessee Eastman process. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2011, 19(5): 1114-1127 [23] Zhao C H, Wang F L, Mao Z Z, Lu N Y, Jia M X. Quality prediction based on phase-specific average trajectory for batch processes. AIChE Journal, 2008, 54(3): 693-705 [24] Downs J J, Vogel E F. A plant-wide industrial process control problem. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 1993, 17(3): 245-255
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1544
- HTML全文浏览量: 53
- PDF下载量: 1689
- 被引次数: 0