2.845

2023影响因子

(CJCR)

  • 中文核心
  • EI
  • 中国科技核心
  • Scopus
  • CSCD
  • 英国科学文摘

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

端边云协同的PID整定智能系统

柴天佑 周正 郑锐 刘宁 贾瑶

柴天佑, 周正, 郑锐, 刘宁, 贾瑶. 端边云协同的PID整定智能系统. 自动化学报, 2023, 49(3): 514−527 doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c230055
引用本文: 柴天佑, 周正, 郑锐, 刘宁, 贾瑶. 端边云协同的PID整定智能系统. 自动化学报, 2023, 49(3): 514−527 doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c230055
Chai Tian-You, Zhou Zheng, Zheng Rui, Liu Ning, Jia Yao. PID tuning intelligent system based on end-edge-cloud collaboration. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2023, 49(3): 514−527 doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c230055
Citation: Chai Tian-You, Zhou Zheng, Zheng Rui, Liu Ning, Jia Yao. PID tuning intelligent system based on end-edge-cloud collaboration. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2023, 49(3): 514−527 doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c230055

端边云协同的PID整定智能系统

doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c230055
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金委重大项目(61991404), 2020年度辽宁省科技重大专项计划(2020JH1/10100008), 一体化过程控制学科创新引智基地2.0 (B08015)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    柴天佑:中国工程院院士, 东北大学教授. IEEE Life Fellow, IFAC Fellow, 欧亚科学院院士. 主要研究方向为自适应控制, 智能解耦控制, 流程工业综合自动化与智能化系统理论、方法与技术. 本文通信作者. E-mail: tychai@mail.neu.edu.cn

    周正:东北大学流程工业综合自动化国家重点实验室博士研究生. 主要研究方向为决策与控制一体化智能系统技术研究. E-mail: 17862716659@163.com

    郑锐:东北大学流程工业综合自动化国家重点实验室博士研究生. 主要研究方向为智能控制技术, 决策与控制一体化智能系统技术. E-mail: 2010263@stu.neu.edu.cn

    刘宁:东北大学流程工业综合自动化国家重点实验室博士研究生. 2019年获得中北大学硕士学位. 主要研究方向为控制理论与技术. E-mail: 18735135253@163.com

    贾瑶:东北大学流程工业综合自动化国家重点实验室讲师. 主要研究方向为智能运行控制技术, 智能控制技术, 智能检测技术, 决策与控制一体化智能系统技术. E-mail: jiayao@mail.neu.edu.cn

PID Tuning Intelligent System Based on End-edge-cloud Collaboration

Funds: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (61991404), Science and Technology Major Project 2020 of Liaoning Province (2020JH1/10100008), and 111 Project 2.0 (B08015)
More Information
    Author Bio:

    CHAI Tian-You Academician of Chinese Academy of Engineering, professor at Northeastern University, IEEE Life Fellow, IFAC Fellow, and academician of the International Eurasian Academy of Sciences. His research interest covers adaptive control, intelligent decoupling control, and theories, methods and technology of synthetical automation and intelligent system for process industries. Corresponding author of this paper

    ZHOU Zheng Ph.D. candidate at the State Key Laboratory of Synthetical Automation for Process Industries, Northeastern University. His research interest covers intelligent system technology integrating decision-making and control

    ZHENG Rui Ph.D. candidate at the State Key Laboratory of Synthetical Automation for Process Industries, Northeastern University. His research interest covers intelligent control technology, and intelligent system technology integrating decision-making and control

    LIU Ning Ph.D. candidate at the State Key Laboratory of Synthetical Automation for Process Industries, Northeastern University. He received his master degree from North University of China in 2019. His research interest covers control theory and technology

    JIA Yao  Lecturer at the State Key Laboratory of Synthetical Automation for Process Industries, Northeastern University. His research interest covers intelligent operation control technology, intelligent control technology, intelligent detection technology, and intelligent system technology integrating decision-making and control

  • 摘要: 本文在分析智能制造对PID整定的新需求及PID整定面临的挑战难题的基础上, 将自动化的建模、控制与优化和人工智能的深度学习与强化学习深度融合与协同, 提出了自适应与自主的PID整定的智能优化方法, 包括端边云协同的PID控制过程数字孪生模型和强化学习与数字孪生模型相结合的PID整定算法. 将工业互联网的端边云协同技术与PLC控制系统相结合, 研制了PID整定智能系统, 并在重大耗能设备 — 电熔镁炉成功应用. 该系统安全、可靠与优化运行, 取得显著的节能减排效果. 最后, 提出了控制系统智能化研究方向需要进一步深入研究的内容.
  • 图  1  PID控制过程与数字孪生模型

    Fig.  1  PID control process and digital twin model

    图  2  端边云协同的PID控制过程数字孪生模型结构

    Fig.  2  The structure of the digital twin model of PID control process based on end-edge-cloud collaboration

    图  3  PID控制器参数整定结构

    Fig.  3  The structure of PID controller parameters tuning

    图  4  基于强化学习的PID整定结构

    Fig.  4  The structure of PID tuning based on reinforcement learning

    图  5  PID整定智能系统功能与架构

    Fig.  5  The function and architecture of PID tuning intelligent system

    图  6  电熔镁炉PID控制过程

    Fig.  6  PID control process of fused magnesia furnace

    图  7  ${\bar{v}_i}(k)$的自适应深度学习模型的长短周期记忆网络架构

    Fig.  7  The long short-term memory architecture of the adaptive deep learning model of ${\bar{v}_i}(k) $

    图  8  电流实际值和数字孪生模型输出曲线

    Fig.  8  The curves of the actual current value and the output of the digital twin model

    图  9  三相电流PID控制器性能指标和整定参数迭代曲线

    Fig.  9  The iterative curves of the performance index and the tunning parameters of the current PID controllers for three phases

    图  10  端边云协同的电熔镁炉PID整定智能系统结构

    Fig.  10  The structure for PID tuning intelligent system of fused magnesia furnace based on end-edge-cloud collaboration

    图  11  采用常规PID控制算法时电极电流$ {y_i}(k)$、熔化电流设定值$ {y_{sp}}(k)$和控制输入$ {u_i}(k)$的曲线

    Fig.  11  The curves of electrode current ${y_i}(k) $, melting current setting ${y_{sp}}(k) $ and control input ${u_i}(k) $ with the conventional PID control algorithm

    图  12  采用本文所提优化整定PID控制算法时电极电流$ {y_i}(k)$、熔化电流设定值$ {y_{sp}}(k)$和控制输入$ {u_i}(k)$的曲线

    Fig.  12  The curves of electrode current ${y_i}(k) $, melting current setting $ {y_{sp}}(k) $ and control input $ {u_i}(k) $ with the proposed algorithm

    表  1  数字孪生模型精度评价表

    Table  1  The evaluation table of the accuracy of the digital twin model

    云数字孪生模型边数字孪生模型
    MAERMSEMAERMSE
    y1(k)429.144535.359466.751651.642
    y2(k)369.998474.175375.679487.996
    y3(k)341.209450.719363.354451.023
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  常规PID方法和本文方法的控制性能评价表(N = 1000)

    Table  2  The evaluation table of the control performance of the conventional PID method and the proposed method

    MSE×10−6IAE×10−6
    ${e_1}(k)$${e_2}(k)$${e_3}(k)$${e_1}(k)$${e_2}(k)$${e_3}(k)$
    常规PID方法1.25791.50441.43322.77053.76293.3114
    本文方法0.67320.71070.84621.25791.50441.4332
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Guo L. Feedback and uncertainty: Some basic problems and results. Annual Reviews in Control, 2020, 49: 27-36 doi: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.04.001
    [2] Samad T. A survey on industry impact and challenges thereof[technical activities]. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 2017, 37(1): 17-18 doi: 10.1109/MCS.2016.2621438
    [3] Borase R, Maghade D K, Sondkar S Y, Pawar S N. A review of PID control, tuning methods and applications. International Journal of Dynamics and Control, 2021, 9(2): 818-827 doi: 10.1007/s40435-020-00665-4
    [4] Åström K J, Hägglund T. PID Controllers: Theory, Design, and Tuning (Second edition). Research Triangle Park: ISA, 1995.
    [5] Somefun O A, Akingbade K, Dahunsi F. The dilemma of PID tuning. Annual Reviews in Control, 2021, 52: 65-74 doi: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2021.05.002
    [6] Ziegler J G, Nichols N B. Optimum settings for automatic controllers. Transactions of the ASME, 1942, 64(8): 759-765 (未能确认刊名信息是否正确, 请核对)
    [7] Åström K J, Hägglund T. Automatic tuning of simple regulators with specifications on phase and amplitude margins. Automatica, 1984, 20(5): 645-651 doi: 10.1016/0005-1098(84)90014-1
    [8] Ho W K, Lim K W, Xu W. Optimal gain and phase margin tuning for PID controllers. Automatica, 1998, 34(8): 1009-1014 doi: 10.1016/S0005-1098(98)00032-6
    [9] Ho W K, Lim K W, Hang C C, Ni L Y. Getting more phase margin and performance out of PID controllers. Automatica, 1999, 35(9): 1579-1585 doi: 10.1016/S0005-1098(99)00055-2
    [10] Silva G J, Datta A, Bhattacharyya S P. On the stability and controller robustness of some popular PID tuning rules. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2003, 48(9): 1638-1641 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2003.817008
    [11] Åström K J, Hägglund T. Revisiting the Ziegler-Nichols step response method for PID control. Journal of Process Control, 2004, 14(6): 635-650 doi: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2004.01.002
    [12] Bazanella A S, Pereira L F A, Parraga A. A new method for PID tuning including plants without ultimate frequency. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2017, 25(2): 637-644 doi: 10.1109/TCST.2016.2557723
    [13] Grimholt C, Skogestad S. Optimal PI and PID control of first-order plus delay processes and evaluation of the original and improved SIMC rules. Journal of Process Control, 2018, 70: 36-46 doi: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2018.06.011
    [14] Hägglund T. The one-third rule for PI controller tuning. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2019, 127: 25-30
    [15] 刘宁, 柴天佑. PID 控制器参数的优化整定方法. 自动化学报, DOI: 10.16383/j.aas.c220795

    Liu Ning, Chai Tian-You. An optimal tuning method of PID controller parameters. Acta Automatica Sinica, DOI: 10.16383/j.aas.c220795
    [16] Tan K K, Zhao S, Xu J X. Online automatic tuning of a proportional integral derivative controller based on an iterative learning control approach. IET Control Theory & Applications, 2007, 1(1): 90-96
    [17] Lequin O, Gevers M, Mossberg M, Bosmans E, Triest L. Iterative feedback tuning of PID parameters: Comparison with classical tuning rules. Control Engineering Practice, 2003, 11(9): 1023-1033 doi: 10.1016/S0967-0661(02)00303-9
    [18] Ho W K, Hong Y, Hansson A, Hjalmarsson H, Deng J W. Relay auto-tuning of PID controllers using iterative feedback tuning. Automatica, 2003, 39(1): 149-157 doi: 10.1016/S0005-1098(02)00201-7
    [19] Son D, Choi H. Iterative feedback tuning of the proportional-integral-differential control of flow over a circular cylinder. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2019, 27(4): 1385-1396 doi: 10.1109/TCST.2018.2828381
    [20] Lawrence N P, Forbes M G, Loewen P D, Mcclement D G, Backström J U, Gopaluni R B. Deep reinforcement learning with shallow controllers: An experimental application to PID tuning. Control Engineering Practice, 2022, 121: Article No. 105046
    [21] Dogru O, Velswamy K, Ibrahim F, Wu Y Q, Sundaramoorthy A S, Huang B, et al. Reinforcement learning approach to autonomous PID tuning. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2022, 161: 107760
    [22] McClement D G, Lawrence N P, Backstrom J U, Loewen P D, Forbes M G, Gopaluni R B. Meta reinforcement learning for adaptive control: An offline approach. arXiv: 2203.09661, 2022.
    [23] Åström K J, Hägglund T. Advanced PID Control. Research Triangle Park: ISA, 2006.
    [24] Åström K J, Hägglund T. Design methods: PID control. Control System Fundamentals (Second edition). Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2017.
    [25] Garpinger O, Hägglund T, Åström K J. Performance and robustness trade-offs in PID control. Journal of Process Control, 2014, 24(5): 568-577 doi: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2014.02.020
    [26] Ortega R, Kelly R. PID self-tuners: Some theoretical and practical aspects. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 1984, IE-31(4): 332-338 doi: 10.1109/TIE.1984.350087
    [27] Kim J H, Choi K K. Design of direct pole placement PID self-tuners. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 1987, IE-34(3): 351-356 doi: 10.1109/TIE.1987.350984
    [28] Wang Q G, Zhang Z P, Åström K J, Chek L S. Guaranteed dominant pole placement with PID controllers. Journal of Process Control, 2009, 19(2): 349-352 doi: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2008.04.012
    [29] Ho W K, Lee T H, Han H P, Hong Y. Self-tuning IMC-PID control with interval gain and phase margins assignment. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2001, 9(3): 535-541 doi: 10.1109/87.918905
    [30] Verma B, Padhy P K. Indirect IMC-PID controller design. IET Control Theory & Applications, 2019, 13(2): 297-305
    [31] Åström K J, Panagopoulos H, Hägglund T. Design of PI controllers based on non-convex optimization. Automatica, 1998, 34(5): 585-601 doi: 10.1016/S0005-1098(98)00011-9
    [32] Sekara T B, Matausek M R. Optimization of PID controller based on maximization of the proportional gain under constraints on robustness and sensitivity to measurement noise. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2009, 54(1): 184-189 doi: 10.1109/TAC.2008.2008359
    [33] Mercader P, Åström K J, Baños A, Hägglund T. Robust PID design based on QFT and convex-concave optimization. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2017, 25(2): 441-452 doi: 10.1109/TCST.2016.2562581
    [34] PoulinÉ, Pomerleau A, Desbiens A, Hodouin D. Development and evaluation of an auto-tuning and adaptive PID controller. Automatica, 1996, 32(1): 71-82 doi: 10.1016/0005-1098(95)00105-0
    [35] Yang Y, Cui K X, Shi D W, Mustafa G, Wang J D. PID control with PID event triggers: Theoretic analysis and experimental results. Control Engineering Practice, 2022, 128: Article No. 105322
    [36] Kuc T Y, Han W G. An adaptive PID learning control of robot manipulators. Automatica, 2000, 36(5): 717-725 doi: 10.1016/S0005-1098(99)00198-3
    [37] Yamamoto T, Takao K, Yamada T. Design of a data-driven PID controller. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2009, 17(1): 29-39 doi: 10.1109/TCST.2008.921808
    [38] Yu H, Guan Z, Chen T W, Yamamoto T. Design of data-driven PID controllers with adaptive updating rules. Automatica, 2020, 121: Article No. 109185
    [39] Zhong S, Huang Y, Guo L. A parameter formula connecting PID and ADRC. Science China Information Sciences, 2020, 63(9): Article No. 192203
    [40] Wang L Y, Jia Y, Chai T Y, Xie W F. Dual-rate adaptive control for mixed separation thickening process using compensation signal based approach. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2018, 65(4): 3621-3632 doi: 10.1109/TIE.2017.2752144
    [41] Wang L H, Chai T Y. Signal compensation based adaptive cascade control for regrinding processes. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2020, 67(10): 8732-8742 doi: 10.1109/TIE.2019.2947804
    [42] Jia Y, Chai T Y, Wang H, Su C Y. A signal compensation based cascaded PI control for an industrial heat exchange system. Control Engineering Practice, 2020, 98: Article No. 104372
    [43] Wei C, Chai T Y, Xin X, Chen X K, Wang L Y, Chen Y H. A signal compensation-based robust swing-up and balance control method for the pendubot. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2022, 69(3): 3007-3016 doi: 10.1109/TIE.2021.3065621
    [44] Wang W Z, Chai T Y, Wang H, Qu Z W. Signal-compensation-based adaptive PID control for fused magnesia smelting processes. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2022.3212392
    [45] Kern A. Pros and cons of autotuning — The big story [Online], available: https://www.controleng.com/articles/pros-and-cons-of-autotuning-the-big-story/, August 2, 2018
    [46] Control Engineering. Pros and cons of autotuning control: Part 2 [Online], available: https://www.controleng.com/articles/pros-and-cons-of-autotuning-control-part-2/, August 2, 2018
    [47] Retch B. Reflections on the learning-to-control renaissance. In: Proceedings of the 21st IFAC World Congress. Berlin, Germany: IFAC, 2020.
    [48] Koelsch J R. Tuning tools maintain harmony in PID loops [Online], available: https://www.automationworld.com/products/software/article/13311005/, February 21, 2014
    [49] Cyber-physical systems [Online], available: https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2008/nsf08611/nsf08611.pdf, July 21, 2009
    [50] Stone P, Brooks R, Brynjolfsson E, Calo R, Etzioni O, Hager G, et al. Artificial intelligence and life in 2030: The one hundred year study on artificial intelligence [Online], available: http://ai100.stanford.edu/2016-report, September 6, 2016
    [51] Mao W L, Zhao Z W, Chang Z, Min G Y, Gao W F. Energy-efficient industrial internet of things: Overview and open issues. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2021, 17(11): 7225-7237 doi: 10.1109/TII.2021.3067026
    [52] Chai T Y, Zhang J W, Yang T. Demand forecasting of the fused magnesia smelting process with system identification and deep learning. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2021, 17(12): 8387-8396 doi: 10.1109/TII.2021.3065930
    [53] 柴天佑, 丁进良. 流程工业智能优化制造. 中国工程科学, 2018, 20(4): 51-58

    Chai Tian-Yu, Ding Jin-Liang. Smart and optimal manufacturing for process industry. Strategic Study of CAE, 2018, 20(4): 51-58
    [54] 柴天佑, 刘强, 丁进良, 卢绍文, 宋延杰, 张艺洁. 工业互联网驱动的流程工业智能优化制造新模式研究展望. 中国科学: 技术科学, 2022, 52(1): 14-25 doi: 10.1360/SST-2021-0405

    Chai Tian-Yu, Liu Qiang, Ding Jin-Liang, Lu Shao-Wen, Song Yan-Jie, Zhang Yi-Jie. Perspectives on industrial-internet-driven intelligent optimized manufacturing mode for process industries. Scientia Sinica Technologica, 2022, 52(1): 14-25 doi: 10.1360/SST-2021-0405
    [55] Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J. Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 1997, 9(8): 1735-1780 doi: 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735
    [56] Silver D, Lever G, Heess N, Degris T, Wierstra D, Riedmiller M. Deterministic policy gradient algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning. Beijing, China: PMLR, 2014. 387−395
    [57] Lillicrap T P, Hunt J J, Pritzel A, Heess N, Erez T, Tassa Y. Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Representations. San Juan, USA: ICLR, 2016.
    [58] Isermann R. Digital Control Systems. Berlin: Springer, 1981.
    [59] Kruse R, Borgelt C, Klawonn F, Moewes C, Steinbrecher M, Held P. Multi-layer perceptrons. Computational Intelligence. London: Springer, 2013.
  • 加载中
图(12) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  4697
  • HTML全文浏览量:  338
  • PDF下载量:  848
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2023-02-15
  • 录用日期:  2023-03-02
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-03-16
  • 刊出日期:  2023-03-20

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回