基于门限和环签名的抗自适应攻击拜占庭容错共识算法

孙海锋; 张文芳; 王小敏; 马征; 黄路非; 李暄

doi:10.16383/j.aas.c200694

基于门限和环签名的抗自适应攻击拜占庭容错共识算法

doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c200694

1.
西南交通大学信息科学与技术学院成都 610031
2.
成都市第三人民医院成都 610014

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(61872302), 四川省重点研发项目 (2021YFQ0056), 四川省科技计划项目(2017SZYZF0002, 2019YFH0097), 四川省卫生信息学会科研课题(2018002)资助

详细信息

作者简介:
孙海锋：西南交通大学信息科学与技术学院硕士研究生. 主要研究方向为区块链信息安全及共识机制. E-mail: alvislly@163.com

张文芳：西南交通大学信息科学与技术学院副教授. 主要研究方向为云计算和分布式系统信息安全, 区块链安全及共识, 轨道交通信息安全. 本文通信作者.E-mail: wfzhang@swjtu.edu.cn

王小敏：西南交通大学信息科学与技术学院教授. 主要研究方向为信息安全和轨道交通安全工程. E-mail: xmwang@swjtu.edu.cn

马征：西南交通大学信息科学与技术学院教授. 主要研究方向为信息和通信工程. E-mail: zma@swjtu.edu.cn

黄路非：成都市第三人民医院高级工程师. 主要研究方向为医疗信息工程. E-mail: lhuang78@163.com

李暄：成都市第三人民医院高级工程师. 主要研究方向为医疗信息工程. E-mail: ally.xuan@hotmail.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 1309
- HTML全文浏览量: 985
- PDF下载量: 168
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-08-28
- 网络出版日期: 2021-03-29
- 刊出日期: 2023-07-20

A Robust Byzantine Fault-tolerant Consensus Algorithm Against Adaptive Attack Based on Ring Signature and Threshold Signature

1.
School of Information Science and Technology, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031
2.
Chengdu Third People＇s Hospital, Chengdu 610014

Funds: Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (61872302), Key Research and Development Program of Sichuan Province (2021YFQ0056), Science and Technology Program of Sichuan Province (2017SZYZF0002, 2019YFH0097), and Scientific Research Project of Health Information Association of Sichuan Province (2018002)

More Information

Author Bio:
SUN Hai-Feng　Master student at the School of Information Science and Technology, Southwest Jiaotong University. His research interest covers information security and consensus mechanisms of blockchains

ZHANG Wen-Fang　Associate professor at the School of Information Science and Technology, Southwest Jiaotong University. Her research interest covers information security of cloud computing and distributed systems, security and consensus mechanisms of blockchains, and information security of rail transport. Corresponding author of this paper

WANG Xiao-Min　Professor at the School of Information Science and Technology, Southwest Jiaotong University. His research interest covers information security and safety engineering of rail transportation

MA Zheng　Professor at the School of Information Science and Technology, Southwest Jiaotong University. His research interest covers information and communication engineering

HUANG Lu-Fei　Senior engineer of Chengdu Third People＇s Hospital. His main research interest is medical informatics engineering

LI Xuan　Senior engineer of Chengdu Third People＇s Hospital. Her main research interest is medical informatics engineering

摘要

摘要: 共识算法作为区块链底层关键技术, 可解决决策权分散的分布式系统中的一致性难题. 良好的共识算法可提升系统健壮性, 但大多数方案在网络故障或主动攻击下存在鲁棒性不可控、活性表现差、可扩展性不足等问题. 针对上述问题, 提出一种抗自适应攻击的健壮拜占庭容错共识算法(Robust Byzantine fault tolerance, RBFT). 该算法利用环签名的无条件强匿名性构造排序选主算法, 隐匿选举每一轮共识中的提案者, 进而达到模糊敌手攻击对象、有效抵抗自适应攻击的目的. 同时, 通过在多轮投票中合成代表法定人数投票意愿的门限签名, 将网络划分为众多最小连通性网络, 以保证在最小连通性网络环境中实现低延迟、高鲁棒性的拜占庭容错共识算法. 分析表明, 系统在提升可扩展性、减少视图更换、降低签名验证开销的同时, 能够有效保证系统活性.
- 区块链 /
- 拜占庭容错 /
- 共识算法 /
- 自适应攻击 /
- 环签名 /
- 门限签名
Abstract: As the fundamental key technology of blockchain, consensus algorithms can resolve the consistency problem in the distributed system with decentralized decision-making authority. Fine-designed consensus algorithms can improve the robustness of system, but most of the schemes have the drawbacks of uncontrollable robustness, poor activity performance and insufficient scalability in the case of network failure or active attack scenarios. Given problems above, this paper proposes a robust Byzantine fault tolerance (RBFT) algorithm resistant to adaptive attacks. Using the ring signature with unconditional strong anonymity, the RBFT algorithm constructs an ordering and master-selecting algorithm to anonymously elect the proposer of every round of consensus, by which the attack object can be obscured from the adaptive attack. Meanwhile, by generating the threshold signature of the designated voters, the network is divided into a number of minimum connected networks to ensure consensus with low latency and high robustness. The analysis shows that by using the proposed RBFT algorithm, the system scalability can be improved, view change frequency and signature verification overhead can be reduced, at the same time the system activity can be effectively guaranteed.
- Blockchain /
- Byzantine fault tolerance /
- consensus algorithm /
- adaptive attack /
- ring signature /
- threshold signature

HTML全文

图 1 联盟链应用场景

Fig. 1 Alliance chain application scenario

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 RBFT算法示意图

Fig. 2 RBFT algorithm diagram

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 有序承诺序列

Fig. 3 Ordered commitment sequence

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 最小连通性网络

Fig. 4 Minimum connectivity network

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 状态一致性概率曲线

Fig. 5 State consistency probability curve

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 网络拓扑图

Fig. 6 Network topology

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 带宽占用量矩形图

Fig. 7 Bandwidth occupation histogram

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 带宽占用量变化曲线图

Fig. 8 Bandwidth occupation curves

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 吞吐率

Fig. 9 throughput

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 拜占庭容错算法性能对比

Table 1 The performance comparison of Byzantine fault tolerant algorithm

方案	抗自适应攻击	鲁棒性	可扩展性	通信复杂度
PBFT^[8]	×	×	×	$ {\rm O}({n^2}) $
Tendermint^[16]	×	×	×	$ {\rm O}({n^2}) $
Algorand^[19]	√	×	√	$ {\rm O}({n^2}) $
SBFT^[14]	×	×	√	$ {\rm O}(n) $
HotStuff^[15]	×	×	√	$ {\rm O}(n) $
RBFT	√	√	√	$ {\rm O}((f + 1)n) $
注:× 代表不支持该性能(或差),√ 代表支持该性能(或强).

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 链码接口

Table 2 Chain code interface

接口名	接口功能	接口接收参数
Open	开户	账户名、金额
Query	查询	账户名
Invoke	转账	账户名、账户名、金额
Delete	销户	账户名

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(24)

[1]	袁勇, 王飞跃. 区块链技术发展现状与展望. 自动化学报, 2016, 42(4): 481-494 doi: 10.16383/j.aas.2016.c160158 Yuan Yong, Wang Fei-Yue. Blockchain: The state of the art and future trends. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2016, 42(4): 481-494 doi: 10.16383/j.aas.2016.c160158
[2]	Nakamoto S. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system [Online], available: https://pdos.csail.mit.edu/6.824/papers/bitcoin.pdf, October 31, 2008
[3]	袁勇, 倪晓春, 曾帅, 王飞跃. 区块链共识算法的发展现状与展望. 自动化学报, 2018, 44(11): 2011-2022 doi: 10.16383/j.aas.2018.c180268 Yuan Yong, Ni Xiao-Chun, Zeng Shuai, Wang Fei-Yue. Blockchain consensus algorithms: The state of the art and future trends. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2018, 44(11): 2011-2022 doi: 10.16383/j.aas.2018.c180268
[4]	Gervais A, Karame G O, Wüst K, Glykantzis V, Ritzdorf H, Capkun S. On the security and performance of proof of work blockchains. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. Vienna, Austria: ACM, 2016. 3−16
[5]	Vasin P. Blackcoin＇s proof-of-stake protocol v2 [Online], available: https://blackcoin.org/blackcoin-pos-protocol-v2-whitepaper.pdf, September 1, 2014
[6]	Larimer D. Delegated proof-of-stake (DPOS) [Online], available: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=558316.0, April 3, 2014
[7]	Lamport L, Shostak R, Pease M. The Byzantine generals problem. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 1982, 4(3): 382-401 doi: 10.1145/357172.357176
[8]	Castro M, Liskov B. Practical byzantine fault tolerance. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation. New Orleans, USA: USENIX Association, 1999. 173−186
[9]	Kotla R, Alvisi L, Dahlin M, Clement A, Wong E. Zyzzyva: Speculative byzantine fault tolerance. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 2007, 41(6): 45-58 doi: 10.1145/1323293.1294267
[10]	Xu H, Long Y, Liu Z Q, Liu Z, Gu D W. Dynamic practical Byzantine fault tolerance. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Communications and Network Security (CNS). Beijing, China: IEEE, 2018. 1−8
[11]	Correia M, Neves N F, Verissimo P. How to tolerate half less one byzantine nodes in practical distributed systems. In: Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems. Florianopolis, Brazil: IEEE, 2004. 174−183
[12]	Veronese G S, Correia M, Bessani A N, Lung L C, Verissimo P. Efficient byzantine fault-tolerance. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 2013, 62(1): 16-30 doi: 10.1109/TC.2011.221
[13]	Cowling J A, Myers D S, Liskov B, Rodrigues R, Shrira L. HQ replication: A hybrid quorum protocol for Byzantine fault tolerance. In: Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation. Seattle, USA: USENIX Association, 2006. 177−190
[14]	Gueta G G, Abraham I, Grossman S, Malkhi D, Pinkas B, Reiter M, et al. SBFT: A scalable and decentralized trust infrastructure. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN). Portland, USA: IEEE, 2019. 568−580
[15]	Yin M F, Malkhi D, Reiter M K, Gueta G G, Abraham I. HotStuff: BFT consensus with linearity and responsiveness. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing. Toronto, Canada: ACM, 2019. 347−356
[16]	Kwon J. Tendermint: Consensus without mining [Online], available: http://diyhpl.us/~bryan/papers2/bitcoin/tendermint_v03.pdf, November 8, 2014
[17]	Pass R, Shi E. Hybrid consensus: Efficient consensus in the permissionless model. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Symposium on Distributed Computing. Vienna, Austria: Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2017. 1−16
[18]	Kokoris-Kogias E, Jovanovic P, Gailly N, Khoffi I, Gasser L, Ford B. Enhancing bitcoin security and performance with strong consistency via collective signing. In: Proceedings of the 25th USENIX Security Symposium. Washington, USA: USENIX Association, 2016. 279−296
[19]	Pass R, Shi E. Thunderella: Blockchains with optimistic instant confirmation. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques. Tel Aviv, Israel: Springer, 2018. 3−33
[20]	Li P L, Wang G S, Chen X Q, Xu W. Gosig: Scalable byzantine consensus on adversarial wide area network for blockchains. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1802.01315, 2018.
[21]	Gilad Y, Hemo R, Micali S, Vlachos G, Zeldovich N. Algorand: Scaling byzantine agreements for cryptocurrencies. In: Proceedings of the 26th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles. Shanghai, China: ACM, 2017. 51−68
[22]	Rivest R L, Shamir A, Tauman Y. How to leak a secret. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptology and Information Security. Gold Coast, Australia: Springer, 2001. 552−565
[23]	Liu J K, Wei V K, Wong D S. Linkable spontaneous anonymous group signature for ad hoc groups. In: Proceedings of the 9th Australasian Conference on Information Security and Privacy. Sydney, Australia: Springer, 2004. 325−335
[24]	Park C, Kurosawa K. New EIGamal type threshold digital signature scheme. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences, 1996, 79-A(1): 86-93