-
摘要: 规则空间模型是一种高效的知识结构诊断模型，但较高的规则空间构造代价阻碍了在小规模、实时认知诊断中的应用.为了提高规则空间模型的可扩展性，提出使用近似子图生成理想属性模式集进而压缩规则空间的方法.近似子图能够通过忽略和测试项目无关的属性降低子图规模量级，从而有效缩减理想属性模式集规模，达到压缩规则空间的目的；同时通过构建顶点间的虚拟边模拟领域知识图上的传递依赖关系，使近似子图在不引入额外属性的前提下保持领域知识图上的依赖关系，实现对不合理属性模式的有效过滤.在此基础上，给出了构造规则空间所需的近似子图构造算法以及由近似子图生成理想属性模式集的方法.最后在标准测试集上开展了近似子图与依赖保持子图和顶点导出子图两种方法的性能对比实验，并将近似子图应用于实际教学认知诊断中验证其诊断准确率，实验结果表明近似子图能够在不损失诊断结果准确率的前提下显著压缩规则空间，降低规则空间模型应用于小规模、实时诊断的门槛.Abstract: Rule-space model is an effective method to diagnose knowledge structure of subjects. But high time cost of rule-space construction is a major obstacle to its application in the small and real time cognitive diagnosis. In order to improve the scalability of rule-space model, an algorithm is proposed to compress rule space by constructing an ideal attribute pattern set using the approximate subgraph. Approximate subgraph can decrease the order of subgraph by ignoring attributes unrelated to testing items so as to reduce the scale of ideal attribute set effectively, then the rule space can be compressed accordingly. At the same time, virtual edges between vertexes are constructed to simulate transitive dependencies on the domain knowledge graph, and these virtual edges preserve indirect dependences on the domain knowledge graph without introducing additional attributes, which ensures effective filteration of unreasonable attribute pattern. On this basis, the approximate graph construction algorithms and ideal attribute pattern generation algorithm supported by approximate subgraph are given for rule space construction. Finally, experiments for comparing the performance among approximate subgraph, dependency preserving subgraph and vertex derived subgraph on the benchmark dataset were carried out, followed by an application in practical teaching cognitive to verify the diagnosis accuracy of approximate subgraph based method. It is concluded that approximate subgraph compresses rule space remarkably without loss of diagnosis accuracy and makes it possible to apply rule space model to small and realtime cognitive diagnosis.
-
Key words:
- Rule space /
- approximate subgraph /
- dependency preserving /
- compression /
- ideal attribute pattern
-
近年来, 基于随机有限集的多目标跟踪算法[1-2]引起了学者们的广泛关注.它从集值估计的角度来解决多目标跟踪问题, 避免了传统多目标跟踪算法中复杂的数据关联过程.众所周知, 数据关联一直是多目标跟踪问题的一个难点, 尤其是在目标个数较多且存在杂波的情况下, 关联过程将变得非常复杂.基于随机有限集的多目标跟踪算法利用随机有限集对多目标的状态和观测建模, 在贝叶斯滤波框架下通过递推后验多目标密度来解决多目标跟踪问题.该类算法主要包括概率假设密度(Probability hypothesis density, PHD)滤波器[3-5]、势概率假设密度(Cardinality PHD, CPHD)滤波器[6-7]和势均衡多目标多伯努利(Cardinality balanced multi-target multi-Bernoulli, CBMeMBer)滤波器[8].不同于PHD和CPHD滤波器递推多目标密度的强度和势分布估计, CBMeMBer滤波器直接近似递推后验多目标密度, 使得多目标跟踪问题的求解显得更为直观.随后, 学者们对CBMeMBer滤波器进行了深入地研究, 并取得了一些研究成果[9-13].
基于随机有限集的多目标跟踪算法主要包括高斯混合(Gaussian mixture, GM)和序贯蒙特卡洛(Sequential Monte Carlo, SMC)两种实现方法.这两种实现方法的前提条件是目标的状态和观测模型为隐马尔科夫模型(Hidden Markov model, HMM), 即目标的状态演化过程是一个马尔科夫过程, 而k时刻目标的量测只与当前时刻目标的状态有关.但在实际应用中, 目标模型不一定满足HMM隐含的马尔科夫假设和独立性假设条件.例如过程噪声与量测噪声相关或量测噪声为有色噪声的情况[14].文献[15-18]等提出一种比HMM更为一般化的Pairwise马尔科夫模型(Pairwise Markov model, PMM), 它将目标的状态和量测整体看作一个马尔科夫过程.与HMM的区别在于: 1)目标的状态不一定为马尔科夫过程; 2)目标的量测不仅与当前时刻的状态有关, 而且与该目标上一时刻的量测也有关系[15].因此, 在解决一些实际问题时采用PMM比采用HMM的效果更好.例如在分割问题中, 采用PMM代替HMM可以有效地降低误差率[19].
本文的研究目的是在PMM框架下利用随机有限集解决杂波环境下的多目标跟踪问题.文献[[20-21]已经给出了在PMM框架下的PHD滤波器及其GM实现.但是当目标数较多时, 该滤波器对目标个数的估计会出现欠估计的情况, 且估计精度和效率较差.本文给出了PMM框架下CBMeMBer滤波器的递推过程, 并给出它在线性高斯PMM条件下的GM实现.最后, 采用文献[21]提出的一种满足HMM局部物理特性的线性高斯PMM, 将本文所提算法与GM-PMM-PHD滤波器进行比较.实验结果表明, 本文所提算法对目标数的估计是无偏的, 不存在GM-PMM-PHD滤波器在目标数较多时出现欠估计的情况, 并且本文所提算法的估计精度和效率也优于GM-PMM-PHD滤波器.
1. HMM和PMM
1.1 HMM
在信号处理过程中, 一个重要问题是根据可观测的量测$y\!=\!{{\left\{ {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{k}} \right\}}_{k\in \rm{IN}}}$估计不可观测的状态$x\!=\!{{\left\{ {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}} \right\}}_{k\in \rm{IN}}}$, IN表示整数.在HMM中, 假设x为马尔科夫过程, 且k时刻的量测${{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{k}}$只与当前时刻的状态${{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}}$有关, 即[15]
\begin{equation}\label{} p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{0:k-1}} \right)=p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k-1}} \right) \end{equation}
(1) \begin{equation}\label{} p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{0:k}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{0:k}} \right)=\prod\limits_{i=0}^{k}{p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{i}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{0:k}} \right)} \end{equation}
(2) \begin{equation}\label{} p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{i}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{0:k}} \right)=p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{i}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{i}} \right), \quad 0\le i\le k \end{equation}
(3) $p\left( \cdot \right)$表示概率密度函数.状态${{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}}$的后验概率密度$p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{0:k}} \right)$可由Bayes递推算法得到[22]:
\begin{equation}\label{} p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{0:k-1}} \right)=\!\int\!{p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k-1}} \right)p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k-1}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{0:k-1}} \right){\rm d}{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k-1}}} \end{equation}
(4) \begin{equation}\label{} p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{0:k}} \right)\propto p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{k}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}} \right)p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{0:k-1}} \right) \end{equation}
(5) 在实际应用中, 由于Bayes公式中存在积分运算, 通常不能得到它的解析解.为了使Bayes公式能够递推运算, 考虑如下线性HMM
\begin{equation}\label{} {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}}={{F}_{k}}{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k-1}}+{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{u}}}_{k}} \end{equation}
(6) \begin{equation}\label{} {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{k}}={{H}_{k}}{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}}+{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{v}}}_{k}} \end{equation}
(7) ${{F}_{k}}$和${{H}_{k}}$分别表示状态转移矩阵和观测矩阵. ${{\mathit{\boldsymbol{u}}}_{k}}$和${{\mathit{\boldsymbol{v}}}_{k}}$分别表示零均值的过程噪声和量测噪声, 与初始状态${{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{0}}$相互独立.若${{\mathit{\boldsymbol{v}}}_{k}}$、${{\mathit{\boldsymbol{u}}}_{k}}$和${{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{0}}$均为高斯变量, 则状态${{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}}$的后验概率密度$p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{0:k}} \right)$为高斯分布, 可以用它的均值和协方差描述.此时, $p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{0:k}} \right)$的Bayes递推过程退化为经典的卡尔曼滤波器[23].
1.2 PMM
在过程噪声与量测噪声相关或量测噪声为有色噪声的情况下, 目标模型不满足HMM隐含的马尔科夫假设和独立性假设条件.此时, 再利用HMM建模是不合适的.文献[15]提出一种比HMM更为一般化的PMM, 它将状态和量测整体$\varepsilon \!=\!\left( x, y \right)$看作马尔科夫过程, 即
\begin{equation}\label{} p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }}}_{k}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }}}_{0:k-1}} \right)=p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }} }_{k}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }} }_{k-1}} \right)=p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}}, {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{k}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k-1}}, {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{k-1}} \right) \end{equation}
(8) 可以有效地处理上述复杂的目标跟踪场景.
在PMM中, x不一定为马尔科夫过程, 且${{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{k}}$不仅与当前时刻的状态${{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}}$有关, 同时与${{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k-1}}$和${{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{k-1}}$也有关系.当$p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}}, {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{k}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k-1}}, {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{k-1}} \right)$满足
\begin{equation}\label{} p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}}, {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{k}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k-1}}, {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{k-1}} \right)=p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k-1}} \right)p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{k}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}} \right) \end{equation}
(9) 时, PMM就退化为HMM, 即HMM是PMM的一种特殊情况.在PMM框架下, 状态${{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}}$的后验概率密度$p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{0:k}} \right)$的Bayes公式为[15]
\begin{equation}\label{} p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{0:k}} \right)\propto \int{p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }}}_{k}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }} }_{k-1}} \right)p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k-1}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{0:k-1}} \right){\rm d}{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k-1}}} \end{equation}
(10) 与HMM框架下的Bayes递推算法的不同之处在于它采用$p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k-1}}, {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{k-1}} \right)$和$p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{k}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}}, {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k-1}}, {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{k-1}} \right)$分别代替$p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k-1}} \right)$和$p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{k}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}} \right)$.同样, 上式没有解析解.
在线性高斯条件下, PMM模型可以描述为
\begin{equation}\label{} \underbrace{\left[\begin{matrix} {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k}} \\ {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{k}} \\ \end{matrix} \right]}_{{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }}}_{k}}}=\underbrace{\left[\begin{matrix} F_{k}^{1}&F_{k}^{2} \\ H_{k}^{1}&H_{k}^{2} \\ \end{matrix} \right]}_{{{B}_{k}}}\underbrace{\left[\begin{matrix} {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{k-1}} \\ {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}_{k-1}} \\ \end{matrix} \right]}_{{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }} }_{k-1}}}+{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{w}}}_{k}} \end{equation}
(11) 其中, ${{\left\{ {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{w}}}_{k}} \right\}}_{k\in \rm{IN}}}$表示零均值的高斯白噪声, 它的协方差为
\begin{equation}\label{} {\rm{E}}\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{w}}}_{k}}\mathit{\boldsymbol{w}}_{k}^{\rm{T}} \right)={{\Sigma }_{k}}=\left[\begin{matrix} \Sigma _{k}^{11}&\Sigma _{k}^{12} \\ \Sigma _{k}^{21}&\Sigma _{k}^{22} \\ \end{matrix} \right] \end{equation}
(12) ${{\left\{ {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{w}}}_{k}} \right\}}_{k\in \rm{IN}}}$与初始状态${{\mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }}}_{0}}$相互独立. ${{\mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }} }_{0}}$服从正态分布N$\left( \cdot ;{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}}_{0}}, {{P}_{0}} \right)$, ${{\mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}}_{0}}$和${{P}_{0}}$分别表示它的均值和协方差.文献[15]给出了在PMM框架下的卡尔曼滤波器.
2. PMM-CBMeMBer滤波器及其GM实现
文献[8]已经给出在HMM框架下CBMeMBer滤波器的递推过程, 这里不再赘述.下面将直接给出在PMM框架下CBMeMBer滤波器的递推过程, 以及它在线性高斯PMM条件下的GM实现.
2.1 PMM-CBMeMBer滤波器
k时刻监控区域内${{M}_{k}}$个目标的状态集合记为${{X}_{k}}\!\!=\!\!\left\{ \mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }} _{k}^{\left( i \right)} \right\}_{i=1}^{{{M}_{k}}}$, 其中${{\mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }}}_{k}}\!\!=\!\!{{\left[\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{k}^{\rm{T}}, \mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}_{k}^{\rm{T}} \right]}^{\rm{T}}}$, ${\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{k}}$和${\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}_{k}}$分别表示目标的动力学状态和量测.在PMM框架下, $\varepsilon $是一个马尔科夫过程, 它的状态转移概率密度$p\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }} }_{k}}|{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }} }_{k-1}} \right)$包含目标的动力学演化模型$p\left( {\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{k}}|{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{k-1}}, {\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}_{k-1}} \right)$和传感器的量测模型$p\left( {\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}_{k}}|{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{k}}, {\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{k-1}}, {\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}_{k-1}} \right)$.根据目标的物理特性, 假设目标的存活概率仅与目标的动力学状态有关, 记为${{p}_{s, k}}\left( {\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{k}} \right)$.
k时刻传感器的量测集合记为${{Z}_{k}}\!=\!\left\{ \mathit{\boldsymbol{z}}_{k}^{\left( i \right)} \right\}_{i=1}^{{{N}_{k}}}$, ${{N}_{k}}$表示量测的个数. ${{Z}_{k}}$由源于目标的量测和杂波量测构成, 两者不可区分.根据传感器的物理特性, 假设传感器的检测概率仅与目标的动力学状态有关, 记为${{p}_{d, k}}\left( {\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{k}} \right)$.
在满足如下假设条件下:
1) ${\varepsilon}$为马尔科夫过程, 目标之间相互独立;
2) 新生目标为多伯努利随机有限集, 与存活目标相互独立;
3) 杂波量测与目标产生的量测相互独立, 杂波数服从泊松分布.
PMM-CBMeMBer滤波器的递推过程如下:
步骤1.预测步
假设$k-1$时刻后验多目标密度为多伯努利形式:
\begin{equation}\label{} {{\pi }_{k-1}}=\left\{ \left( r_{k-1}^{\left( i \right)}, p_{k-1}^{\left( i \right)} \right) \right\}_{i=1}^{{{M}_{k-1}}} \end{equation}
(13) $r_{k-1}^{\left( i \right)}\in \left[0, 1 \right]$, 表示$k-1$时刻第i个目标的存在概率, $p_{k-1}^{\left( i \right)}\left( {\mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }}_{i}} \right)$表示${\mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }}_{i}}$的概率密度, ${{M}_{k-1}}$表示$k-1$时刻可能出现的最大目标数.则预测多目标密度也为多伯努利形式:
\begin{equation}\label{} {{\pi }_{k|k-1}}\!\!=\!\!\left\{ \!\left( \!r_{P, k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}, p_{P, k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)} \!\right) \!\right\}_{i=1}^{{{M}_{k-1}}}\!\!\bigcup\! \left\{ \!\left( \!r_{\Gamma, k}^{\left( i \right)}, p_{\Gamma, k}^{\left( i \right)} \!\right) \!\right\}_{i=1}^{{{M}_{\Gamma, k}}} \end{equation}
(14) 前一项表示存活目标的密度, 后一项表示k时刻新生目标的密度.
\begin{equation}\label{} r_{P, k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}=r_{k-1}^{\left( i \right)}\left\langle p_{k-1}^{\left( i \right)}, {{p}_{s, k}} \right\rangle \end{equation}
(15) \begin{equation}\label{} p_{P, k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }} \right)=\frac{\left\langle {{p}_{k|k-1}}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }} |\cdot \right), p_{k-1}^{\left( i \right)}{{p}_{s, k}} \right\rangle }{\left\langle p_{k-1}^{\left( i \right)}, {{p}_{s, k}} \right\rangle } \end{equation}
(16) $\left\langle \cdot, \cdot \right\rangle $表示内积运算, 如$\left\langle \alpha, \beta \right\rangle =\int{\alpha \left( x \right)\beta \left( x \right){\rm d}x}$.
步骤2.更新步
假设k时刻预测多目标密度为多伯努利形式
\begin{equation}\label{} {{\pi }_{k|k-1}}=\left\{ \left( r_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}, p_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)} \right) \right\}_{i=1}^{{{M}_{k|k-1}}} \end{equation}
(17) 则后验多目标密度可由如下多伯努利形式近似
\begin{equation}\label{} {{\pi }_{k}}\!\approx \!\left\{ \!\left( r_{L, k}^{\left( i \right)}, p_{L, k}^{\left( i \right)} \right) \!\right\}_{i=1}^{{{M}_{k|k-1}}}\!\!\bigcup\! {{\left\{ \!\left( {{r}_{U, k}}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{z}} \right)\!, {{p}_{U, k}}\!\left( \cdot ;\mathit{\boldsymbol{z}} \right)\! \right) \!\right\}}_{\mathit{\boldsymbol{z}}\in {{Z}_{k}}}} \end{equation}
(18) 前一项表示漏检部分的多目标密度, 后一项表示量测更新部分的多目标密度.
\begin{equation}\label{} r_{L, k}^{\left( i \right)}=r_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}\frac{1-\left\langle p_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}, {{p}_{d, k}} \right\rangle }{1-r_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}\left\langle p_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}, {{p}_{d, k}} \right\rangle } \end{equation}
(19) \begin{equation}\label{} p_{L, k}^{\left( i \right)}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }} \right)=p_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }} \right)\frac{1-{{p}_{d, k}}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{x}} \right)}{1-\left\langle p_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}, {{p}_{d, k}} \right\rangle } \end{equation}
(20) \begin{equation}\label{} {{r}_{U, k}}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{z}} \right)\!=\!\frac{\sum\limits_{i=1}^{{{M}_{k|k-1}}}{\frac{r_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}\left( 1-r_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)} \right)\left\langle p_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}, {{\psi }_{k, \mathit{\boldsymbol{z}}}} \right\rangle }{{{\left( 1-r_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}\left\langle p_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}, {{p}_{d, k}} \right\rangle \right)}^{2}}}}}{{{\kappa }_{k}}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{z}} \right)\!+\!\sum\limits_{i=1}^{{{M}_{k|k-1}}}{\frac{r_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}\left\langle p_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}, {{\psi }_{k, \mathit{\boldsymbol{z}}}} \right\rangle }{1-r_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}\left\langle p_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}, {{p}_{d, k}} \right\rangle }}} \end{equation}
(21) \begin{equation}\label{} {{p}_{U, k}}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }} ;\mathit{\boldsymbol{z}} \right)\!=\!\frac{\sum\limits_{i=1}^{{{M}_{k|k-1}}}{\frac{r_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}}{1-r_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}}p_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }} \right){{\psi }_{k, \mathit{\boldsymbol{z}}}}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }} \right)}}{\sum\limits_{i=1}^{{{M}_{k|k-1}}}{\frac{r_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}}{1-r_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}}\left\langle p_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}{{\psi }_{k, \mathit{\boldsymbol{z}}}} \right\rangle }} \end{equation}
(22) ${{\psi }_{k, \mathit{\boldsymbol{z}}}}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }} \right)={{p}_{d, k}}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{x}} \right){g_k}\left( {\mathit{\boldsymbol{z}}|\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}} \right)$
${{\kappa }_{k}}\left( \cdot \right)$表示k时刻杂波的强度, ${g_k}\left( {\mathit{\boldsymbol{z}}|\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}} \right)$表示目标$\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}$的似然函数.
在上述递推过程中, 若状态转移函数${{p}_{k|k-1}}$满足式(9), 并且新生目标模型满足:
\begin{equation}\label{} {{\gamma }_{\Gamma, k}}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}, \mathit{\boldsymbol{y}} \right)={{g}_{k}}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}|\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}} \right){{\tilde{\gamma }}_{\Gamma, k}}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{x}} \right) \end{equation}
(23) ${{\tilde{\gamma }}_{\Gamma, k}}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{x}} \right)$表示仅与目标动力学状态相关的新生目标密度函数.此时, PMM-CBMeMBer滤波算法就退化为HMM-CBMeMBer滤波算法.
2.2 PMM-CBMeMBer滤波器的GM实现
下面给出PMM-CBMeMBer滤波器在线性高斯条件下的GM实现.
在新生目标模型中, 若$p_{\Gamma, k}^{\left( i \right)}$为GM形式:
\begin{equation}\label{} p_{\Gamma, k}^{\left( i \right)}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}, \mathit{\boldsymbol{y}} \right)\!=\!\sum\limits_{j=1}^{J_{\Gamma, k}^{\left( i \right)}}{\omega _{\Gamma, k}^{\left( i, j \right)}N\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}, \mathit{\boldsymbol{y}};\mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{\Gamma, k}^{\left( i, j \right)}, P_{\Gamma, k}^{\left( i, j \right)} \right)} \end{equation}
(24) 其中, $J_{\Gamma, k}^{\left( i \right)}$表示第i个目标对应的高斯项个数, $\omega _{\Gamma , k}^{\left( i, j \right)}$、$\mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{\Gamma, k}^{\left( i, j \right)}$和$P_{\Gamma, k}^{\left( i, j \right)}$分别表示第i个目标中第j个高斯项的权重、均值和协方差.则GM-PMM-CBMeMBer滤波器的递推过程如下:
步骤1.预测步
假设$k-1$时刻后验多目标密度
\begin{equation}\label{} {{\pi }_{k-1}}\!=\!\left\{\! \left( r_{k-1}^{1, \left( i \right)}, p_{k-1}^{1, \left( i \right)} \right)\! \right\}_{i=1}^{M_{k-1}^{1}}\!\bigcup\! \left\{\! \left( r_{k-1}^{2, \left( i \right)}, p_{k-1}^{2, \left( i \right)} \right)\! \right\}_{i=1}^{M_{k-1}^{2}} \end{equation}
(25) 已知, $p_{k-1}^{\ell, \left( i \right)}$, $\ell =\left\{ 1, 2 \right\}$, 为如下GM形式,
\begin{equation}\label{} p_{k-1}^{1, \left( i \right)}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}, \mathit{\boldsymbol{y}} \right)=\sum\limits_{j=1}^{J_{k-1}^{1, \left( i \right)}}{\omega _{k-1}^{1, \left( i, j \right)}{\rm N}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}, \mathit{\boldsymbol{y}};\mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{k-1}^{1, \left( i, j \right)}, P_{k-1}^{1, \left( i, j \right)} \right)} \end{equation}
(26) \begin{equation}\label{} p_{k-1}^{2, \left( i \right)}\!\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}, \mathit{\boldsymbol{y}} \right)\!=\!\!\sum\limits_{j=1}^{J_{k-1}^{2, \left( i \right)}}\!{\omega _{k-1}^{2, \left( i, j \right)}\!{\rm N}\!\!\left( \!\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}};\mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{k-1}^{2, \left( i, j \right)}\!, P_{k-1}^{2, \left( i, j \right)} \!\right)\!{{\delta }_{{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{z}}}^{\left( i \right)}}}}\!\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{y}} \right)} \end{equation}
(27) ${{\delta }_{{{\mathit{\boldsymbol{z}}}^{\left( i \right)}}}}\!\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{y}} \right)$为Dirac delta函数[2], ${{\mathit{\boldsymbol{z}}}^{\left( i \right)}}\in {{Z}_{k-1}}$, ${\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}}$表示状态为${\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}$对应的量测.若${{\mathit{\boldsymbol{z}}}^{\left( i \right)}}=\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}$, 说明${{\mathit{\boldsymbol{z}}}^{\left( i \right)}}$是由$\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}$产生的量测; 否则, $\mathit{\boldsymbol{z}}^{\left( i \right)}$不是由${\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}$产生的量测.则预测多目标密度
\begin{align} {\pi _{k|k - 1}} \!=&\! \left\{ {\!\left( {r_{P, k|k - 1}^{1, \left( i \right)}, p_{P, k|k - 1}^{1, \left( i \right)}} \right)} \!\right\}_{i = 1}^{M_{k - 1}^1} \cup \nonumber\\ &\left\{ {\!\left( {r_{P, k|k - 1}^{2, \left( i \right)}, p_{P, k|k - 1}^{2, \left( i \right)}} \right)} \!\right\}_{i = 1}^{M_{k - 1}^2} \!\cup\!\nonumber\\ &\left\{ {\!\left( {r_{\Gamma, k}^{\left( i \right)}, p_{\Gamma, k}^{\left( i \right)}} \right)} \!\right\}_{i = 1}^{{M_{\Gamma, k}}} \end{align}
(28) 可由如下公式得到:
\begin{align} &r_{P, k|k-1}^{\ell, \left( i \right)}={{p}_{s, k}}r_{k-1}^{\ell , \left( i \right)}, \quad \ell =\left\{ 1, 2 \right\} \end{align}
(29) \begin{align} &p_{P, k|k-1}^{1, \left( i \right)}\!\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}, \mathit{\boldsymbol{y}} \right)\!=\nonumber\\ &\qquad\sum\limits_{j=1}^{J_{k-1}^{1, \left( i \right)}}\!\!{\omega _{k-1}^{1, \left( i, j \right)}\!{\rm N}\!\!\left(\! \mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}, \mathit{\boldsymbol{y}};\mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{P, k|k-1}^{1, \left( i, j \right)}, P_{P, k|k-1}^{1, \left( i, j \right)} \!\right)}\end{align}
(30) \begin{align} &p_{P, k|k-1}^{2, \left( i \right)}\!\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}, \mathit{\boldsymbol{y}} \right)\!=\nonumber\\ &\qquad\sum\limits_{j=1}^{J_{k-1}^{2, \left( i \right)}}\!\!{\omega _{k-1}^{2, \left( i, j \right)}\!{\rm N}\!\!\left( \!\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}, \mathit{\boldsymbol{y}};\mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{P, k|k-1}^{2, \left( i, j \right)}, P_{P, k|k-1}^{2, \left( i, j \right)} \!\right)} \end{align}
(31) 其中
\begin{equation}\label{} \mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{P, k|k-1}^{1, \left( i, j \right)}\!=\!{{B}_{k}}\mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{k-1}^{1, \left( i, j \right)}, \mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{P, k|k-1}^{2, \left( i, j \right)}\!=\!{{B}_{k}}\!\left[\begin{matrix} \mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{k-1}^{2, \left( i, j \right)} \\ {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{z}}}^{\left( i \right)}} \\ \end{matrix} \right] \end{equation}
(32) \begin{equation}\label{} P_{P, k|k-1}^{1, \left( i, j \right)}={{\Sigma }_{k}}+{{B}_{k}}P_{k-1}^{1, \left( i, j \right)}B_{k}^{\rm{T}} \end{equation}
(33) \begin{equation}\label{} P_{P, k|k-1}^{2, \left( i, j \right)}={{\Sigma }_{k}}+\left[\begin{matrix} F_{k}^{1} \\ H_{k}^{1} \\ \end{matrix} \right]P_{k-1}^{2, \left( i, j \right)}\left[\begin{matrix} {{\left( F_{k}^{1} \right)}^{\rm{T}}}&{{\left( H_{k}^{1} \right)}^{\rm{T}}} \\ \end{matrix} \right] \end{equation}
(34) 新生目标模型已知, $p_{\Gamma, k}^{\left( i \right)}$见式(24).
步骤2.更新步
在式(28)中, 由于组成预测多目标密度的三个部分形式相同, 令${{M}_{k|k-1}}=M_{k-1}^{1}+M_{k-1}^{2}+{{M}_{\Gamma, k}}$, 它们可以重写为
\begin{equation}\label{} {{\pi }_{k|k-1}}=\left\{ \left( r_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}, p_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)} \right) \right\}_{i=1}^{{{M}_{k|k-1}}} \end{equation}
(35) \begin{equation}\label{} p_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}, \mathit{\boldsymbol{y}} \right)\!=\!\sum\limits_{j=1}^{J_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}}\!{\omega _{k|k-1}^{\left( i, j \right)}{\rm N}\!\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}, \mathit{\boldsymbol{y}};\mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{k|k-1}^{\left( i, j \right)}, P_{k|k-1}^{\left( i, j \right)} \right)} \end{equation}
(36) \begin{equation}\label{} \mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{k|k-1}^{\left( i, j \right)}\!=\!\left[\begin{matrix} \mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{k|k-1}^{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}, \left( i, j \right)} \\ \mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{k|k-1}^{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}, \left( i, j \right)} \\ \end{matrix} \right]\!, P_{k|k-1}^{\left( i, j \right)}\!=\!\left[\begin{matrix} P_{k|k-1}^{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}, \left( i, j \right)} \!&\! P_{k|k-1}^{\mathit{\boldsymbol{xy}}, \left( i, j \right)} \\ P_{k|k-1}^{\mathit{\boldsymbol{yx}}, \left( i, j \right)} \!&\! P_{k|k-1}^{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}, \left( i, j \right)} \\ \end{matrix} \right] \end{equation}
(37) 则更新多目标密度
\begin{align} {{\pi }_{k}}\!=&\!\left\{ \!\left( r_{L, k}^{\left( i \right)}, p_{L, k}^{\left( i \right)} \right) \!\right\}_{i=1}^{{{M}_{k|k-1}}}\!\bigcup\!\nonumber\\&{{\left\{ \!\left( {{r}_{U, k}}\!\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{z}} \right)\!, {{p}_{U, k}}\!\left( \cdot ;\mathit{\boldsymbol{z}} \right) \right) \!\right\}}_{\mathit{\boldsymbol{z}}\in {{Z}_{k}}}} \end{align}
(38) 可由如下公式得到:
\begin{equation}\label{} r_{L, k}^{\left( i \right)}=r_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}\frac{1-{{p}_{d, k}}}{1-r_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}{{p}_{d, k}}} \end{equation}
(39) \begin{equation}\label{} p_{L, k}^{\left( i \right)}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}, \mathit{\boldsymbol{y}} \right)=p_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}, \mathit{\boldsymbol{y}} \right) \end{equation}
(40) \begin{equation}\label{} {{r}_{U, k}}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{z}} \right)=\frac{\sum\limits_{i=1}^{{{M}_{k|k-1}}}{\frac{r_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}\left( 1-r_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)} \right)\rho _{U, k}^{\left( i \right)}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{z}} \right)}{{{\left( 1-r_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}{{p}_{d, k}} \right)}^{2}}}}}{{{\kappa }_{k}}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{z}} \right)+\sum\limits_{i=1}^{{{M}_{k|k-1}}}{\frac{r_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}\rho _{U, k}^{\left( i \right)}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{z}} \right)}{1-r_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}{{p}_{d, k}}}}} \end{equation}
(41) \begin{equation}\label{} {p_{U, k}}\!\left( \!{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}, \mathit{\boldsymbol{y}};\mathit{\boldsymbol{z}}} \!\right)\! =\! \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{M_{k|k - 1}}}\! {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{J_{k|k - 1}^{\left( i \right)}} \!\!{\omega _{U, k}^{\left( {i, j} \right)}\!\!\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{z}} \right)\!{\rm N}\!\!\left( \! {\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}};\mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{U, k}^{\left( {i, j} \right)}\!, P_{U, k}^{\left( {i, j} \right)}} \!\right)} } }}{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{{M_{k|k - 1}}} {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{J_{k|k - 1}^{\left( i \right)}} {\omega _{U, k}^{\left( {i, j} \right)}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{z}} \right)} } }} \end{equation}
(42) 其中
\begin{equation}\label{} \rho _{U, k}^{\left( i \right)}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{z}} \right)={{p}_{d, k}}\sum\limits_{j=1}^{J_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}}{\omega _{k|k-1}^{\left( i, j \right)}q_{k}^{\left( i, j \right)}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{z}} \right)} \end{equation}
(43) \begin{equation}\label{} q_{k}^{\left( i, j \right)}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{z}} \right)={\rm N}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{z}};\mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{k|k-1}^{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}, \left( i, j \right)}, P_{k|k-1}^{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}, \left( i, j \right)} \right) \end{equation}
(44) \begin{equation}\label{} \omega _{U, k}^{\left( i, j \right)}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{z}} \right)=\frac{r_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}}{1-r_{k|k-1}^{\left( i \right)}}{{p}_{d, k}}\omega _{k|k-1}^{\left( i, j \right)}q_{k}^{\left( i, j \right)}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{z}} \right) \end{equation}
(45) \begin{equation}\label{} \mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{U, k}^{\left( i, j \right)}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{z}} \right)=\mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{k|k-1}^{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}, \left( i, j \right)}+K_{U, k}^{\left( i, j \right)}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{z}}-\mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{k|k-1}^{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}, \left( i, j \right)} \right) \end{equation}
(46) \begin{equation}\label{} P_{U, k}^{\left( i, j \right)}=P_{k|k-1}^{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}, \left( i, j \right)}-K_{U, k}^{\left( i, j \right)}{{\left( P_{k|k-1}^{\mathit{\boldsymbol{xy}}, \left( i, j \right)} \right)}^{\rm{T}}} \end{equation}
(47) \begin{equation}\label{} K_{U, k}^{\left( i, j \right)}=P_{k|k-1}^{\mathit{\boldsymbol{xy}}, \left( i, j \right)}{{\left( P_{k|k-1}^{\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}, \left( i, j \right)} \right)}^{-1}} \end{equation}
(48) 在更新步中, 漏检部分的状态包括动力学状态和相应的量测, 协方差也是动力学状态和量测整体的协方差; 量测更新部分给出了动力学状态的求解, 式(46)中的$\mathit{\boldsymbol{z}}$表示该动力学状态对应的量测, 式(47)为目标动力学状态的协方差, 不包括量测以及量测与动力学状态的协方差.即算法中漏检部分和量测更新部分对应的多目标密度的表示形式不同, 故在$k-1$时刻将多目标密度假设为相应的两部分.
根据GM-HMM-PHD滤波器得到的后验多目标强度的高斯项个数[5], 不难得到在不考虑衍生目标的情况下GM-HMM-CBMeMBer滤波器的后验多目标密度的高斯项个数为$\left(\! \sum\nolimits_{i=1}^{{{M}_{k-1}}}\!\!{J_{k-1}^{\left( i \right)}}\!+\!\sum\nolimits_{i=1}^{{{M}_{\Gamma, k}}}\!\!{J_{\Gamma , k}^{\left( i \right)}} \!\right)\!\left( \!1\!+\!\left| {{Z}_{k}} \right|\! \right)$, GM-PMM-CBMeMBer滤波器的后验多目标密度的高斯项个数为$\left( \! \sum\nolimits_{i=1}^{M_{k-1}^{1}}\!\!{J_{k-1}^{1, \left( i \right)}}\!+\!\sum\nolimits_{i=1}^{M_{k-1}^{2}}\!\!{J_{k-1}^{2, \left( i \right)}}\!+\!\sum\nolimits_{i=1}^{{{M}_{\Gamma , k}}}\!\!{J_{\Gamma, k}^{\left( i \right)}} \!\right)\!$ $(\! 1\!+\!| {{Z}_{k}} | \!)$.在相同场景下, GM-PMM-CBMeMBer滤波器和GM-HMM-CBMeMBer滤波器的计算复杂度为同一数量级.但由于GM-PMM-CBMeMBer滤波器状态维数的增加, 计算量会相应增大.
由于新生目标的出现和更新步中假设轨迹的平均化, 航迹个数和每条航迹对应的高斯项会逐渐增加, 需要采用剪切和合并技术[5]进行处理: 1)剪切.一是航迹的剪切, 去掉存在概率小于阈值为${{T}_{r}}$的航迹; 二是航迹对应的高斯项的剪切, 去掉权值小于阈值为${{T}_{\omega }}$的高斯项. 2)合并.在每条航迹中, 将距离小于阈值为U的高斯项进行合并.由于在后验多目标密度中漏检部分和量测更新部分对应的高斯项的形式不同, 在合并过程中需要加以区分.同时, 设定航迹数的最大值为${{M}_{\max }}$, 每条航迹对应的高斯项个数的最大值为${{J}_{\max }}$.最后, 对目标的状态进行提取.若航迹的存在概率大于给定阈值(如0.5), 则认为它是一个目标, 选择它对应的权值最大的高斯项作为目标的状态.
3. 仿真
3.1 一种满足HMM局部物理特性的PMM
文献[21]总结了过程噪声与量测噪声相关和量测噪声为有色噪声对应的PMM, 并提出一种满足HMM局部物理特性的PMM.为了与HMM框架下的CBMeMBer滤波器的性能进行比较, 本文采用上述满足HMM局部物理特性的PMM进行仿真实验.并将本文所提算法的跟踪性能与PHD滤波器[21]进行比较.下面首先给出该PMM的描述.
假设线性高斯HMM为
\begin{equation}\label{} p\left( {\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{0}} \right)={\rm N}\left( {\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{0}};{\mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{0}}, {{P}_{0}} \right) \end{equation}
(49) \begin{equation}\label{} {{f}_{k|k-1}}\left( {\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{k}}|{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{k-1}} \right)={\rm N}\left( {\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{k}};{{F}_{k}}{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{k-1}}, {{Q}_{k}} \right) \end{equation}
(50) \begin{equation}\label{} {{g}_{k}}\left( {\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}_{k}}|{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{k}} \right)={\rm N}\left( {\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}_{k}};{{H}_{k}}{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{k}}, {{R}_{k}} \right) \end{equation}
(51) 则满足$p\left( {\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{k}}|{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{k-1}} \right)={{f}_{k|k-1}}\left( {\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{k}}|{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{k-1}} \right)$, $p( {\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}_{k}}|{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{k}})={{g}_{k}}\left( {\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}_{k}}|{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{k}} \right)$, 且${{p}_{k|k-1}}=\left( {\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{k}}, {\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}_{k}}|{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{k-1}}, {\mathit{\boldsymbol{y}}_{k-1}} \right)$不依赖于参数$\left( {\mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{0}}, {{P}_{0}} \right)$的线性高斯PMM为
\begin{equation}\label{} p\left( {\mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }}_{0}} \right)\!=\!{\rm N}\left( {\mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }}_{0}};\left[\begin{matrix} {\mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{0}} \\ {{H}_{0}}{\mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{0}} \\ \end{matrix} \right]\!, \left[\begin{matrix} {{P}_{0}} \!&\! {{\left( {{H}_{0}}{{P}_{0}} \right)}^{\rm{T}}} \\ {{H}_{0}}{{P}_{0}}\! &\! {{R}_{0}}\!+\!{{H}_{0}}{{P}_{0}}H_{0}^{\rm{T}} \\ \end{matrix} \right] \right) \end{equation}
(52) \begin{equation}\label{} {{p}_{k|k-1}}\left( {\mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }}_{k}}|{\mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }}_{k-1}} \right)={\rm N}\left( {\mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }}_{k}};{{B}_{k}}{\mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }}_{k-1}}, {{\Sigma }_{k}} \right) \end{equation}
(53) 其中
\begin{equation}\label{} {{B}_{k}}=\left[\begin{matrix} {{F}_{k}}-F_{k}^{2}{{H}_{k-1}}&F_{k}^{2} \\ {{H}_{k}}{{F}_{k}}-H_{k}^{2}{{H}_{k-1}}&H_{k}^{2} \\ \end{matrix} \right] \end{equation}
(54) \begin{equation}\label{} {{\Sigma }_{k}}=\left[\begin{matrix} \Sigma _{k}^{11}&\Sigma _{k}^{12} \\ \Sigma _{k}^{21}&\Sigma _{k}^{22} \\ \end{matrix} \right] \end{equation}
(55) \begin{equation}\label{} \Sigma _{k}^{11}={{Q}_{k}}-F_{k}^{2}{{R}_{k-1}}{{\left( F_{k}^{2} \right)}^{\rm{T}}} \end{equation}
(56) \begin{equation}\label{} \Sigma _{k}^{21}={{\left( \Sigma _{k}^{12} \right)}^{\rm{T}}}={{H}_{k}}{{Q}_{k}}-H_{k}^{2}{{R}_{k-1}}{{\left( F_{k}^{2} \right)}^{\rm{T}}} \end{equation}
(57) \begin{equation}\label{} \Sigma _{k}^{22}={{R}_{k}}-H_{k}^{2}{{R}_{k-1}}{{\left( H_{k}^{2} \right)}^{\rm{T}}}+{{H}_{k}}{{Q}_{k}}H_{k}^{\rm{T}} \end{equation}
(58) 在满足${{\Sigma }_{k}}$为正定矩阵的情况下, $F_{k}^{2}$和$H_{k}^{2}$可以任意选取.
3.2 仿真分析
为了与PHD滤波器的跟踪性能进行比较, 依据文献[21]对上述PMM的参数进行设置.
\begin{equation}\label{} {{F}_{k}}=\left[\begin{matrix} 1&t&0&0 \\ 0&1&0&0 \\ 0&0&1&t \\ 0&0&0&1 \\ \end{matrix} \right], \quad {{H}_{k}}=\left[\begin{matrix} 1&0&0&0 \\ 0&0&1&0 \\ \end{matrix} \right] \end{equation}
(59) \begin{equation}\label{} {{Q}_{k}}=\left[\begin{matrix} 100&1&0&0 \\ 1&10&0&0 \\ 0&0&100&1 \\ 0&0&1&10 \\ \end{matrix} \right], \quad {{R}_{k}}=\left[\begin{matrix} {{10}^{2}}&0 \\ 0&{{10}^{2}} \\ \end{matrix} \right] \end{equation}
(60) \begin{equation}\label{} F_{k}^{2}=\left[\begin{matrix} a&0 \\ 0&0 \\ 0&b \\ 0&0 \\ \end{matrix} \right], \quad H_{k}^{2}=\left[\begin{matrix} c&0 \\ 0&d \\ \end{matrix} \right] \end{equation}
(61) 令$t=1$, $a=b=0.7$, $c=d=0.1$.仿真硬件环境为Matlab R2013b, Windows 10 64bit, Intel Core i5-4570 CPU 3.20GHz, RAM 4.00GB.
监控区域内有12个目标:目标1、2和3在$k=1$时出现, 4、5和6在$k=20$时出现, 7和8在$k=40$时出现, 9和10在$k=60$时出现, 11和12在$k=80$时出现, 而目标1和2在$k=70$时消失, 其他目标不消失.目标的状态为${\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{k}}={{\left[ {{x}_{k}}, {{{\dot{x}}}_{k}}, {{y}_{k}}, {{{\dot{y}}}_{k}} \right]}^{\rm{T}}}$, ${{x}_{k}}$和${{y}_{k}}$表示二维笛卡尔坐标系下目标的位置, ${{\dot{x}}_{k}}$和${{\dot{y}}_{k}}$分别表示对应方向的速度.在监控区域$V=\left[-2000, ~2000 \right]\rm{m}\times \left[ -2000, ~2000 \right]m$中, 各采样时刻的杂波个数服从均值为20的泊松分布, 杂波量测在监控区域内均匀分布. 图 1是基于上述线性高斯PMM的目标运动轨迹, 红色三角形表示目标的初始位置.
CBMeMBer滤波器中新生目标的模型参数${{\pi }_{\Gamma }}\!\!=\!\!\left\{ \left( {{r}_{\Gamma }}, p_{\Gamma }^{\left( i \right)} \right) \right\}_{i=1}^{4}$设置如下:在HMM中, ${{r}_{\Gamma }}\!\!=\!\!0.01$, $p_{\Gamma }^{\left( i \right)}\left( x \right) \!\!=\!\!{\rm N}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{x}};\mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{\Gamma }^{\left( i \right)}, {{P}_{\Gamma }} \right)$, $\mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{\Gamma }^{\left( 1 \right)}\!\!=\!\!{{\left[0, 0, 0, 0 \right]}^{\rm{T}}}$, $\mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{\Gamma }^{\left( 2 \right)}\!\!=\!\!{{\left[400, 0, -600, 0 \right]}^{\rm{T}}}$, $\mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{\Gamma }^{\left( 3 \right)}\!\!=\!\!{{\left[-800, 0, -200, 0 \right]}^{\rm{T}}}$, $\mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_{\Gamma }^{\left( 4 \right)}\!\!=\!\!{{\left[-200, 0, 800, 0 \right]}^{\rm{T}}}$, ${{P}_{\Gamma }}\!\!=\!\!\rm{diag}\left\{\!1000, 400, 1000, 400 \right\}$; 在PMM中, ${{r}_{\Gamma }}=0.01$,
$p_\Gamma ^{\left( i \right)}\left( \mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }} \right) = {\rm{N}}\left( {\mathit{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon }};\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_\Gamma ^{\left( i \right)}}\\ {{H_k}\mathit{\boldsymbol{m}}_\Gamma ^{\left( i \right)}} \end{array}} \right],\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{P_\Gamma }}&{{{\left( {{H_k}{P_\Gamma }} \right)}^{\rm{T}}}}\\ {{H_k}{P_\Gamma }}&{{R_k} + {H_k}{P_\Gamma }H_k^{\rm{T}}} \end{array}} \right]} \right)$
$i=\left\{ 1, \cdots, 4 \right\}$.目标的存活概率为${{p}_{s, k}}=0.98$, 传感器的检测概率为${{p}_{d, k}}=0.9$.在剪切和合并过程中, 设航迹存在概率的阈值为${{T}_{r}}={{10}^{-3}}$, 高斯项权值的阈值为${{T}_{\omega }}={{10}^{-5}}$, 合并阈值为$U=4\rm{m}$, 航迹的最大值为${{M}_{\max }}=100$, 每条航迹对应高斯项个数的最大值为${{J}_{\max }}=30$. PHD滤波器新生目标的模型参数见文献[21].
图 2给出了GM-PMM-CBMeMBer滤波器单次仿真的结果, 两个子图分别对应不同时刻X轴和Y轴的状态估计.整体来看, 所提算法可以比较准确地估计目标的状态.在某些时刻会出现虚假目标或目标跟踪丢失的情况, 但随着时间推移, 算法自身可以很快地进行修正.
本文采用OSPA (Optimal subpattern assignment)距离[24]评估算法的跟踪性能.设多目标真实状态的集合为$X=\left\{ {\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{1}}, \cdots , {\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{m}} \right\}$, 估计状态的集合为$\hat{X}=\left\{ {{{\hat{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}}}_{1}}, \cdots, {{{\hat{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}}}_{n}} \right\}$, 若$m\le n$, 则OSPA距离为
\begin{equation}\label{} \begin{array}{l} \bar d_p^{\left( c \right)}\left( {X, \hat X} \right) = \\ \quad {\left( {\frac{1}{n}\left( {\mathop {\min }\limits_{\pi \in {\Pi _n}} \sum\limits_{i = 1}^m {{d^{\left( c \right)}}{{\left( {{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_i}, {{\hat {\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}}_{\pi \left( i \right)}}} \right)}^p} + {c^p}\left( {n - m} \right)} } \right)} \right)^{\frac{1}{p}}} \end{array} \end{equation}
(62) 其中, ${{d}^{\left( c \right)}}\left( {\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}_{i}}, {{{\hat{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}}}}_{\pi \left( i \right)}} \right)=\min \left( c, \left\| \mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}-\hat{\mathit{\boldsymbol{x}}} \right\| \right)$, ${{\Pi }_{n}}$表示$\left\{ 1, \cdots, n \right\}$的所有排列集合.若$m>n$, 则$\bar d_p^{\left( c \right)}\left( {X, \hat X} \right) = \bar d_p^{\left( c \right)}\left( {\hat X, X} \right)$.令距离阶次$p=1$, 截断系数$c=20\rm {m}$.
本例做了500次蒙特卡洛(Monte carlo, MC)仿真实验, 分析结果如下:
1) 图 3为不同算法对目标数估计的均值和标准差.可以看出, 在PMM或HMM框架下, CBMeMBer滤波器对目标数的估计是无偏的, PHD滤波器随着目标数的增加, 会出现欠估计的情况.说明本文所提算法对目标数的估计优于PHD滤波器[21].相比不同框架下的CBMeMBer滤波器和PHD滤波器, 它们对目标数估计的统计特性非常接近.
2) 图 4为不同算法对应的OSPA距离.可以看出, CBMeMBer滤波器在PMM和HMM框架下的OSPA距离评价指标均优于PHD滤波器. CBMeMBer滤波器和PHD滤波器在PMM框架下的OSPA距离评价指标优于HMM框架下相应的OSPA距离评价指标.
3) 表 1为不同杂波环境下4种算法的性能比较.不同杂波环境下, CBMeMBer滤波器和PHD滤波器在PMM框架下的OSPA距离评价指标优于HMM框架下的OSPA距离评价指标, 但单步运行时间的均值会变大.由于GM-CBMeMBer滤波器是将每个目标的密度分别用GM表示, 而GM-PHD滤波器是将多目标密度的强度整体用GM表示.因此, 它们的高斯项个数不同, 比较运行时间也就没有意义.但从表 1可以看出, 相比GM-PMM-PHD滤波器, GM-PMM-CBMeMBer滤波器以更小的时间代价可以得到更优的OSPA距离评价指标.
表 1 不同杂波环境下的性能比较Table 1 Tracking performance verses clutter's number$\lambda $ 0 5 10 20 PMM-CBMeMBer OSPA(m) 15.173 15.196 15.202 15.390 时间(s) 0.0203 0.0221 0.0237 0.0244 HMM-CBMeMBer OSPA(m) 16.010 16.065 16.086 16.234 时间(s) 0.0179 0.0194 0.0211 0.0228 PMM-PHD OSPA(m) 15.631 15.654 15.698 15.739 时间(s) 0.0203 0.0280 0.0350 0.0476 HMM-PHD OSPA(m) 16.806 16.817 16.855 16.889 时间(s) 0.0084 0.0118 0.0132 0.0191 4. 结论
本文提出一种在PMM框架下的CBMeMBer滤波器, 并给出了它在线性高斯PMM条件下的GM实现.该算法放宽了HMM隐含的马尔科夫假设和独立性假设限制.在仿真实验中, 采用一种满足HMM局部物理特性的PMM, 将本文所提算法与文献[21]所提的GM-PMM-PHD滤波器进行比较, 仿真结果表明本文所提算法的跟踪性能优于GM-PMM-PHD滤波器.本文考虑的是PMM在线性高斯条件下的多目标跟踪问题, 而非线性条件下的多目标跟踪问题有待进一步研究.
-
图 2 $G$关于$K(Q_{\rm sub})$的近似子图
Fig. 2 The approximate subgraph of $G$ on division criteria $K(Q_{\rm sub})$
图 4 第1组实验规则空间生成时间
Fig. 4 Time performance of rule space generation in the first experiment
图 5 第2组实验规则空间生成时间
Fig. 5 Time performance of rule space generation in the second experiment
表 1 测试项目及其对应的属性
Table 1 Test item and its attributes
属性 $q_1$ $q_2$ $q_3$ $q_4$ $q_5$ 相交线 $\surd $ $\surd $ 三角形 $\surd $ $\surd $ 三角形高 $\surd $ $\surd $ 三角形面积 $\surd $ 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 由$Q_{\rm sub}$生成的理想属性模式
Table 2 Ideal attribute pattern generated by $Q_{\rm sub}$
ID $m$ $L(m)$ 1 $0000$ {} 2 $1000$ {相交线} 3 $1100$ {相交线, 三角形} 4 $1110$ {相交线, 三角形, 三角形高} 5 $1111$ {相交线, 三角形, 三角形高, 三角形面积}
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 理想属性模式与期望反应模式的对应关系
Table 3 Expected response pattern corresponding to ideal attribute pattern
ID $m$ $L(m)$ $R(m)$ 1 $0000$ {} 00000 2 $1000$ {相交线} 10000 3 $1100$ {相交线, 三角形} 11000 4 $1110$ {相交线, 三角形, 三角形高} 11101 5 $1111$ {相交线, 三角形, 三角形高, 三角形面积} 11111
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 由VDS导出的理想属性模式集
Table 4 Ideal attribute set exported from VDS
ID $m$ $L(m)$ 1 $0000$ {} 2 $0100$ {三角形} 3 $0110$ {三角形, 三角形高} 4 $0111$ {三角形, 三角形高, 三角形面积} 5 $1000$ {相交线} 6 $1100$ {相交线, 三角形} 7 $1110$ {相交线, 三角形, 三角形高} 8 $1111$ {相交线, 三角形, 三角形高, 三角形面积}
下载: 导出CSV
表 5 第1组实验中子图及理想属性模式规模
Table 5 Scale of subgraphs and ideal attribute pattern in the first experiment
ID $|Q_{\rm sub}|$ $|K(Q_{\rm sub})|$ $|V|$ $|E|$ $|M|$ DPS VDS AS DPS VDS AS DPS VDS AS 1 5 4 5 4 4 6 2 5 14 11 5 2 5 6 9 6 6 13 3 7 134 31 16 3 6 5 6 5 5 8 3 6 28 18 9 4 6 7 10 7 7 13 4 9 195 54 26 5 10 9 13 9 9 18 5 11 802 156 82 6 11 7 11 7 7 15 4 9 258 49 24 7 12 15 19 15 15 29 11 20 4 836 763 392 8 15 11 17 11 11 23 7 14 6 751 538 262 9 17 14 20 14 14 28 9 18 19 735 3 365 1 144 10 17 12 19 12 12 27 7 15 9 754 1 044 393
下载: 导出CSV
表 6 第2组实验中子图及理想属性模式规模
Table 6 The scale of subgraphs and ideal attribute pattern in practical teaching cogonitive diagnosis in the second experiment
ID $|Q_{\rm sub}|$ $|K(Q_{\rm sub})|$ $|V|$ $|E|$ $|M|$ DPS VDS AS DPS VDS AS DPS VDS AS 1 6 6 10 6 6 13 4 5 130 28 19 2 6 6 8 6 6 10 4 5 44 31 18 3 6 5 8 5 5 10 3 5 43 20 11 4 6 6 10 6 6 14 4 6 126 28 19 5 7 7 11 7 7 15 4 8 210 60 29 6 8 7 10 7 7 13 5 6 135 49 32 7 7 8 13 8 8 17 5 8 763 102 48 8 8 6 9 6 6 12 4 7 76 27 15
下载: 导出CSV
表 7 诊断结果准确率
Table 7 Accuracy of diagnostic results
编号 Valid $H$(91~100 %) $M$(81~90 %) $L$(0~80 %) 1 49 89.38 8.01 2.61 2 51 92.79 5.03 2.18 3 50 88.09 8.38 3.53 4 51 95.13 3.62 1.25 5 53 90.43 6.72 2.85 6 52 86.11 9.22 4.67 7 53 85.23 9.81 4.96 8 55 94.91 3.31 1.78
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 石俊飞, 刘芳, 林耀海, 刘璐.基于深度学习和层次语义模型的极化SAR分类.自动化学报, 2017, 43(2): 215-226 http://www.aas.net.cn/CN/abstract/abstract19010.shtmlShi Jun-Fei, Liu Fang, Lin Yao-Hai, Liu Lu. Polarimetric SAR image classification based on deep learning and hierarchical semantic model. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2017, 43(2): 215-226 http://www.aas.net.cn/CN/abstract/abstract19010.shtml [2] 曾帅, 王帅, 袁勇, 倪晓春, 欧阳永基.面向知识自动化的自动问答研究进展.自动化学报, 2017, 43(9): 1491-1508 http://www.aas.net.cn/CN/abstract/abstract19126.shtmlZeng Shuai, Wang Shuai, Yuan Yong, Ni Xiao-Chun, Ouyang Yong-Ji. A survey on question answering systems towards knowledge automation. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2017, 43(9): 1491-1508 http://www.aas.net.cn/CN/abstract/abstract19126.shtml [3] 白天翔, 王帅, 沈震, 曹东璞, 郑南宁, 王飞跃.平行机器人与平行无人系统:框架、结构、过程、平台及其应用.自动化学报, 2017, 43(2): 161-175 http://www.aas.net.cn/CN/abstract/abstract18998.shtmlBai Tian-Xiang, Wang Shuai, Shen Zhen, Cao Dong-Pu, Zheng Nan-Ning, Wang Fei-Yue. Parallel robotics and parallel unmanned systems: framework, structure, process, platform and applications. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2017, 43(2): 161-175 http://www.aas.net.cn/CN/abstract/abstract18998.shtml [4] Hooshyar D, Ahmad R B, Yousefi M, Fathi M, Horng S J, Lim H. Applying an online game-based formative assessment in a flowchart-based intelligent tutoring system for improving problem-solving skills. Computers and Education, 2016, 94: 18-36 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.013 [5] Rau M A, Michaelis J E, Fay N. Connection making between multiple graphical representations: a multi-methods approach for domain-specific grounding of an intelligent tutoring system for chemistry. Computers and Education, 2015, 82: 460-485 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.009 [6] Duffy M C, Azevedo R. Motivation matters: interactions between achievement goals and agent scaffolding for self-regulated learning within an intelligent tutoring system. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015, 52: 338-348 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.041 [7] 戴汝为, 张雷鸣.思维(认知)科学在中国的创新与发展.自动化学报, 2010, 36(2): 193-198 http://www.aas.net.cn/CN/abstract/abstract15990.shtmlDai Ru-Wei, Zhang Lei-Ming. The creation and development of noetic (cognitive) science in China. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2010, 36(2): 193-198 http://www.aas.net.cn/CN/abstract/abstract15990.shtml [8] Tatsuoka K K. Rule space: an approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1983, 20(4): 345-354 doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1983.tb00212.x [9] 辛涛, 焦丽亚.测量理论的新进展:规则空间模型.华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2006, 24(3): 50-56, 61 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5560.2006.03.007Xin Tao, Jiao Li-Ya. A new perspective for testing theory: the rule-space model. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2006, 24(3): 50-56, 61 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5560.2006.03.007 [10] Bernacki M L, Aleven V, Nokes-Malach T J. Stability and change in adolescents' task-specific achievement goals and implications for learning mathematics with intelligent tutors. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014, 37: 73-80 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.009 [11] Gálvez J, Guzmán E, Conejo R, Mitrovic A, Mathews M. Data calibration for statistical-based assessment in constraint-based tutors. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2016, 97: 11-23 doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2016.01.024 [12] Gutierrez F, Atkinson J. Adaptive feedback selection for intelligent tutoring systems. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38(5): 6146-6152 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.058 [13] Shikatani B, Vas S N, Goldstein D A, Wilkes C M, Buchanan A, Sankin L S, Grant J E. Individualized Intensive treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a team approach. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 2016, 23(1): 31-39 doi: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2014.09.002 [14] Özyurt Ö, Özyurt H. Learning style based individualized adaptive e-learning environments: content analysis of the articles published from 2005 to 2014. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015, 52: 349-358 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.020 [15] Belcadhi L C. Personalized feedback for self assessment in lifelong learning environments based on semantic web. Computers in Human Behavior, 2016, 55: 562-570 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.042 [16] Im S, Yin Y. Diagnosing skills of statistical hypothesis testing using the rule space method. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2009, 35(4): 193-199 doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2009.12.004 [17] Xin T, Xu Z Y, Tatsuoka K. Linkage between teacher quality, student achievement, and cognitive skills: a rule-space model. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2004, 30(3): 205 -223 doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2004.09.002 [18] Badaracco M, Martínez L. A fuzzy linguistic algorithm for adaptive test in intelligent tutoring system based on competences. Expert Systems with Applications, 2013, 40(8): 3073-3086 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.023 [19] Qin C Y, Zhang L, Qiu D L, Huang L, Geng T, Jiang H, Ren Q, Zhou J Z. Model identification and Q-matrix incremental inference in cognitive diagnosis. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2015, 86: 66-76 doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.05.024 [20] 汪玲玲, 陈平, 辛涛, 衷克定.基于BP神经网络的认知诊断计算机化自适应测验实现.北京师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 51(2): 206-211 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/bjsfdxxb201502019Wang Ling-Ling, Chen Ping, Xin Tao, Zhong Ke-Ding. Realizing cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing based on BP neural network. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science), 2015, 51(2): 206-211 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/bjsfdxxb201502019 [21] Cui Y, Gierl M, Guo Q. Statistical classification for cognitive diagnostic assessment: an artificial neural network approach. Educational Psychology, 2016, 36(6): 1065-1082 doi: 10.1080/01443410.2015.1062078 [22] Bandyopadhyay S, Bhadra T, Mitra P, Maulik U. Integration of dense subgraph finding with feature clustering for unsupervised feature selection. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2014, 40: 104-112 doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2013.12.008 [23] Cameron D, Kavuluru R, Rindflesch T C, Sheth A P, Thirunarayan K, Bodenreider O. Context-driven automatic subgraph creation for literature-based discovery. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2015, 54: 141-157 doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.01.014 [24] Azimi S, Gratie C, Ivanov S, Petre I. Dependency graphs and mass conservation in reaction systems. Theoretical Computer Science, 2015, 598: 23-39 doi: 10.1016/j.tcs.2015.02.014 [25] Yap K C, Chia K P. Knowledge construction and misconstruction: a case study approach in asynchronous discussion using knowledge construction-message map (KCMM) and knowledge construction-message graph (KCMG). Computers and Education, 2010, 55(4): 1589-1613 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.002 [26] Baier C, Katoen J P. Principles of Model Checking. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2008. [27] Huang S B, Huang H T, Chen Z Y, Lv T Y, Zhang T. Lazy slicing for state-space exploration. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2012, 27(4): 872-890 doi: 10.1007/s11390-012-1271-7 [28] Akgün Ö. Extensible automated constraint modelling via refinement of abstract problem specifications. Constraints, 2017, 22(1): 91-92 doi: 10.1007/s10601-016-9258-6 [29] Pelechano N, Fuentes C. Hierarchical path-finding for Navigation Meshes (HNA*). Computers and Graphics, 2016, 59: 68-78 doi: 10.1016/j.cag.2016.05.023 [30] 张绍辉.集成参数自适应调整及隐含层降噪的深层RBM算法.自动化学报, 2017, 43(5): 855-86 http://www.aas.net.cn/CN/abstract/abstract19063.shtmlZhang Shao-Hui. Deep RBM algorithm with adaptive adjustment parameters and de-noising in hidden layer. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2017, 43(5): 855-865 http://www.aas.net.cn/CN/abstract/abstract19063.shtml 期刊类型引用(3)
1. 王国良，宋歌. 基于观测器的离散马氏跳变系统的故障估计. 南京信息工程大学学报(自然科学版). 2021(05): 517-525 . 
百度学术2. 刘江义，王春平，王暐. 基于双马尔可夫链的SMC-CBMeMBer滤波. 系统工程与电子技术. 2019(08): 1686-1691 . 百度学术3. 郎波，樊一娜. 基于深度神经网络的个性化学习行为评价方法. 计算机技术与发展. 2019(07): 6-10 . 百度学术其他类型引用(7)
-
下载:
计量
- 文章访问数: 1305
- HTML全文浏览量: 237
- PDF下载量: 78
- 被引次数: 10
