2.845

2023影响因子

(CJCR)

  • 中文核心
  • EI
  • 中国科技核心
  • Scopus
  • CSCD
  • 英国科学文摘

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于多层关系图模型的中文评价对象与评价词抽取方法

廖祥文 陈兴俊 魏晶晶 陈国龙 程学旗

廖祥文, 陈兴俊, 魏晶晶, 陈国龙, 程学旗. 基于多层关系图模型的中文评价对象与评价词抽取方法. 自动化学报, 2017, 43(3): 462-471. doi: 10.16383/j.aas.2017.c160060
引用本文: 廖祥文, 陈兴俊, 魏晶晶, 陈国龙, 程学旗. 基于多层关系图模型的中文评价对象与评价词抽取方法. 自动化学报, 2017, 43(3): 462-471. doi: 10.16383/j.aas.2017.c160060
LIAO Xiang-Wen, CHEN Xing-Jun, WEI Jing-Jing, CHEN Guo-Long, CHENG Xue-Qi. A Multi-layer Relation Graph Model for Extracting Opinion Targets and Opinion Words. ACTA AUTOMATICA SINICA, 2017, 43(3): 462-471. doi: 10.16383/j.aas.2017.c160060
Citation: LIAO Xiang-Wen, CHEN Xing-Jun, WEI Jing-Jing, CHEN Guo-Long, CHENG Xue-Qi. A Multi-layer Relation Graph Model for Extracting Opinion Targets and Opinion Words. ACTA AUTOMATICA SINICA, 2017, 43(3): 462-471. doi: 10.16383/j.aas.2017.c160060

基于多层关系图模型的中文评价对象与评价词抽取方法

doi: 10.16383/j.aas.2017.c160060
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金青年项目 61300105

中国科学院网络数据科学与技术重点实验室开放基金课题 CASNDST20140X

详细信息
    作者简介:

    廖祥文  福州大学数学与计算机学院副教授.主要研究方向为文本倾向性检索与挖掘.E-mail:liaoxw@fzu.edu.cn

    陈兴俊  福州大学数学与计算机学院硕士研究生.主要研究方向为文本倾向性检索与挖掘.E-mail:346993131@qq.com

    魏晶晶  福州大学物理与信息工程学院博士研究生.主要研究方向为观点挖掘.E-mail:weijj@fjjxu.edu.cn

    程学旗  中国科学院网络数据科学与工程重点实验室主任.主要研究方向为大数据分析与挖掘.E-mail:cxq@ict.ac.cn

    通讯作者:

    陈国龙  福州大学数学与计算机科学学院教授.主要研究方向为智能信息处理.本文通信作者.E-mail:cgl@fzu.edu.cn

A Multi-layer Relation Graph Model for Extracting Opinion Targets and Opinion Words

Funds: 

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61300105

Key Laboratory of Network Data Science & Technology, Chinese Science and Technology Foundation CASNDST20140X

More Information
    Author Bio:

    Associate professor at College of Mathematics and Computer Science, Fuzhou University. His research interest covers text orientation retrieval and mining

    Master student at the College of Mathematics and Computer Science, Fuzhou University. His research interest covers text orientation retrieval and mining

    Ph.D. candidate at the College of Physics and Information Engineering, Fuzhou University. Her main research interest is opinion mining

    Director of Key Laboratory of Network Data Science & Technology, Chinese Science and Technology. His research interest covers big data analysis and mining

    Corresponding author: CHEN Guo-Long Professor at the College of Mathematics and Computer Science, Fuzhou University. His main research interest is intelligent information processing. Corresponding author of this paper
  • 摘要: 中文评价对象与评价词抽取是文本倾向性分析的重要问题.如何利用评价对象与评价词之间的语法、共现等关系设计模型是提高抽取精度的关键.本文提出了一种基于多层关系图模型的中文评价对象与评价词抽取方法.该方法首先利用词对齐模型抽取评价对象与评价词搭配;然后,考虑评价对象与评价词的依存句法关系、评价对象内部的共现关系和评价词内部的共现关系,建立多层情感关系图,接着利用随机游走方法计算候选评价对象与评价词的置信度;最后,选取置信度高的候选评价对象与评价词作为输出.实验结果表明,与现有的方法相比,本文所提出的方法不仅对评价对象和评价词的抽取精度均有显著提升,而且具有良好的鲁棒性.
  • 图  1  两种不同的依存句法关系示例

    Fig.  1  Two different syntactical dependency examples

    图  2  依存句法分析示例

    Fig.  2  The example of dependency syntactic parsing

    图  3  评价对象、句法模式和评价词的多层关系图

    Fig.  3  The multi-layer relation graph on opinion target, syntactic pattern and opinion word

    图  4  评价对象抽取的宏平均和微平均结果

    Fig.  4  Micro and macro results of opinion targets extraction

    图  5  评价词抽取的宏平均和微平均结果

    Fig.  5  Micro and macro results of opinion words extraction

    图  6  不同 $\alpha$ , $\beta$ 的评价对象抽取结果

    Fig.  6  Different results of opinion targets extraction according to $\alpha$ , $\beta$

    图  7  不同 $\alpha$ , $\beta$ 的评价词抽取结果

    Fig.  7  Different results of opinion words extraction according to $\alpha$ , $\beta$

    表  1  语料库中候选项的统计信息

    Table  1  The statistics of candidate terms in the corpus

    ${T_i}$ $\sim{T_i}$
    ${T_j}$ ${K_1}({T_i},{T_j})$ ${K_2}(\sim{T_i},{T_j})$
    $\sim{T_j}$ ${K_3}({T_i},\sim{T_j})$ ${K_4}(\sim{T_i},\sim{T_j})$
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  语料统计表

    Table  2  The description of dataset

    领域 句子总数 评价对象数 评价词数
    电子产品 15 051 3 593 5 068
    影视娱乐 7 915 997 1 344
    金融证券 6 382 534 605
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  评价对象抽取的对比实验结果

    Table  3  The results of our method VS baseline on opinion

    领域 方法 Precision Recall ${\rm{F1\_measure}}$
    电子产品 ${\rm{COAE}}\_{\rm{BEST}}$ 0.223 0.160 0.186
    LIU 0.199 0.221 0.209
    ${\rm{WAM\_U}}$ 0.338 0.376 0.356
    ${\rm{WAM\_I}}$ 0.346 0.385 0.364
    MULTI 0.365 0.406 0.384
    影视娱乐 ${\rm{COAE}}\_{\rm{BEST}}$ 0.203 0.053 0.078
    LIU 0.102 0.154 0.123
    ${\rm{WAM\_U}}$ 0.173 0.261 0.208
    ${\rm{WAM\_I}}$ 0.185 0.279 0.223
    MULTI 0.171 0.258 0.206
    金融证券 ${\rm{COAE}}\_{\rm{BEST}}$ 0.090 0.045 0.045
    LIU 0.210 0.315 0.252
    ${\rm{WAM\_U}}$ 0.120 0.180 0.144
    ${\rm{WAM\_I}}$ 0.183 0.273 0.219
    MULTI 0.275 0.412 0.330
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  评价词抽取的对比实验结果

    Table  4  The results of our method VS baseline on opinion word

    领域 方法 Precision Recall ${\rm{F1\_measure}}$
    电子产品 ${\rm{COAE}}\_{\rm{BEST}}$ 0.218 0.113 0.126
    ${\rm{WAM\_U}}$ 0.187 0.221 0.203
    ${\rm{WAM\_I}}$ 0.197 0.233 0.214
    MULTI 0.326 0.386 0.353
    影视娱乐 ${\rm{COAE}}\_{\rm{BEST}}$ 0.130 0.096 0.064
    ${\rm{WAM\_U}}$ 0.081 0.120 0.096
    ${\rm{WAM\_I}}$ 0.076 0.113 0.091
    MULTI 0.118 0.176 0.141
    金融证券 ${\rm{COAE}}\_{\rm{BEST}}$ 0.044 0.121 0.049
    ${\rm{WAM\_U}}$ 0.048 0.079 0.060
    ${\rm{WAM\_I}}$ 0.035 0.058 0.044
    MULTI 0.175 0.289 0.218
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 黄萱菁, 赵军.中文文本情感倾向性分析.中国计算机学会通讯, 2008, 4(2): 39-47

    Huang Xuan-Jing, Zhao Jun. Chinese text sentiment orientation analysis. Communications of the CCF, 2008, 4(2): 39-47
    [2] Zhuang L, Jing F, Zhu X Y. Movie review mining and summarization. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. Arlington, Virginia, USA: ACM, 2006. 43-50
    [3] Wang B, Wang H F. Bootstrapping both product features and opinion words from Chinese customer reviews with cross-inducing. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing. Hyderabad, India, 2008. 289-295
    [4] Kim S M, Hovy E. Identifying opinion holders for question answering in opinion texts. In: Proceedings of AAAI-05 Workshop on Question Answering in Restricted Domains. Pennsylvania, USA: AAAI, 2005. 1367-1373
    [5] Jin W, Ho H H, Srihari R K. OpinionMiner: a novel machine learning system for web opinion mining and extraction. In: Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Paris, France: ACM, 2009. 1195-1204
    [6] Wu Y B, Zhang Q, Huang X J, Wu L D. Phrase dependency parsing for opinion mining. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2009. 1533-1541
    [7] Jakob N, Gurevych I. Extracting opinion targets in a single-and cross-domain setting with conditional random fields. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010. 1035-1045
    [8] Hu M Q, Liu B. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Seattle, USA: ACM, 2004. 168-177
    [9] Qiu G, Liu B, Bu J J, Chen C. Opinion word expansion and target extraction through double propagation. Computational Linguistics, 2011, 37(1): 9-27 doi: 10.1162/coli_a_00034
    [10] Xu L H, Liu K, Lai S W, Chen Y B, Zhao J. Mining opinion words and opinion targets in a two-stage framework. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Sofia, Bulgaria: ACL, 2013. 1764-1773
    [11] Liu K, Xu L H, Zhao J. Syntactic patterns versus word alignment: extracting opinion targets from online reviews. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Sofia, Bulgaria: ACL, 2013. 1754-1763
    [12] Liu K, Xu L H, Zhao J. Opinion target extraction using word-based translation model. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning. Jeju Island, South Korea: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2012. 1346-1356
    [13] 陈兴俊, 魏晶晶, 廖祥文, 简思远, 陈国龙.基于词对齐模型的中文评价对象与评价词抽取.山东大学学报 (理学版), 2016, 51(1): 58-64, 70 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SDDX201601008.htm

    Chen Xing-Jun, Wei Jing-Jing, Liao Xiang-Wen, Jian Si-Yuan, Chen Guo-Long. Extraction of opinion targets and opinion words from Chinese sentences based on word alignment model. Journal of Shandong University (Natural Science), 2016, 51(1): 58-64, 70 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SDDX201601008.htm
    [14] Zhou X J, Wan X J, Xiao J G. Cross-language opinion target extraction in review texts. In: Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. Brussels, Belgium: IEEE, 2012. 1200-1205
    [15] Li S S, Wang R Y, Zhou G D. Opinion target extraction using a shallow semantic parsing framework. In: Proceedings of the 26th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Toronto, Canada: AAAI, 2012. 1671-1677
    [16] Huang H, Liu Q T, Huang T. Appraisal expression recognition based on generalized mutual information. Journal of Computers, 2013, 8(7): 1715-1721 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272798717_Appraisal_Expression_Recognition_Based_on_Generalized_Mutual_Information
    [17] 赵妍妍, 秦兵, 车万翔, 刘挺.基于句法路径的情感评价单元识别.软件学报, 2011, 22(5): 887-898 doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1001.2011.03767

    Zhao Yan-Yan, Qin Bing, Che Wan-Xiang, Liu Ting. Appraisal expression recognition based on syntactic path. Journal of Software, 2011, 22(5): 887-898 doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1001.2011.03767
    [18] Li F T, Pan S J, Jin O, Yang Q, Zhu X Y. Cross-domain co-extraction of sentiment and topic lexicons. In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Long Papers-Volume 1. Jeju Island, South Korea: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2012. 410-419
    [19] Brown P F, Della Pietra V J, Della Pietra S A, Mercer R L. The mathematics of statistical machine translation: parameter estimation. Computational Linguistics, 1993, 19(2): 263-311 http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.13.8919
    [20] 舒万里. 中文领域本体学习中概念和关系抽取的研究[硕士学位论文], 重庆大学, 中国, 2012

    Shu Wan-Li. Research on Concept and Relation Extraction of Chinese Domain Ontology [Master dissertation], Chongqing University, China, 2012
  • 加载中
图(7) / 表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2784
  • HTML全文浏览量:  252
  • PDF下载量:  787
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2016-01-20
  • 录用日期:  2016-06-17
  • 刊出日期:  2017-03-20

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回