2.845

2023影响因子

(CJCR)

  • 中文核心
  • EI
  • 中国科技核心
  • Scopus
  • CSCD
  • 英国科学文摘

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

开工时间延迟下的炼钢-连铸生产重调度方法

俞胜平 柴天佑

俞胜平, 柴天佑. 开工时间延迟下的炼钢-连铸生产重调度方法. 自动化学报, 2016, 42(3): 358-374. doi: 10.16383/j.aas.2016.c150197
引用本文: 俞胜平, 柴天佑. 开工时间延迟下的炼钢-连铸生产重调度方法. 自动化学报, 2016, 42(3): 358-374. doi: 10.16383/j.aas.2016.c150197
YU Sheng-Ping, CHAI Tian-You. Rescheduling Method for Starting Time Delay in Steelmaking and Continuous Casting Production Processes. ACTA AUTOMATICA SINICA, 2016, 42(3): 358-374. doi: 10.16383/j.aas.2016.c150197
Citation: YU Sheng-Ping, CHAI Tian-You. Rescheduling Method for Starting Time Delay in Steelmaking and Continuous Casting Production Processes. ACTA AUTOMATICA SINICA, 2016, 42(3): 358-374. doi: 10.16383/j.aas.2016.c150197

开工时间延迟下的炼钢-连铸生产重调度方法

doi: 10.16383/j.aas.2016.c150197
基金项目: 

国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划) 2015AA043802

国家自然科学基金 61473074

国家自然科学基金 61104174

详细信息
    作者简介:

    柴天佑 中国工程院院士, 东北大学教授, IEEE Fellow, IFAC Fellow.1985年获得东北大学博士学位.主要研究方向为自适应控制, 多变量智能解耦控制, 流程工业综合自动化理论、方法与技术.E-mail:tychai@mail.neu.edu.cn

    通讯作者:

    俞胜平 流程工业综合自动化国家重点实验室(东北大学)讲师, 博士研究生.分别于1999年和2005年获得西安建筑科技大学学士学位和东北大学硕士学位.主要研究方向为生产计划与调度, 智能优化算法, 制造执行系统.本文通信作者.E-mail:spyu@mail.neu.edu.cn

Rescheduling Method for Starting Time Delay in Steelmaking and Continuous Casting Production Processes

Funds: 

National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) 2015AA043802

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61473074

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61104174

More Information
    Author Bio:

    Academician of Chinese Academy of Engineering, professor at Northeastern University, IEEE Fellow, IFAC Fellow. He received his Ph.D. degree from Northeastern University in 1985. His research interest covers adaptive control, intelligent decoupling control, and integrated automation theory, method and technology of industrial process.E-mail:

    Corresponding author: YU Sheng-Ping Lecturer and Ph.D. candidate at the State Key Laboratory of Synthetical Automation for Process Industries (Northeastern University). He received the bachelor degree from Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology in 1999, and master degree from Northeastern University in 2005. His research interest covers production planning and scheduling, intelligent optimization methods and manufacturing execution systems. Corresponding author of this paper.E-mail:spyu@mail.neu.edu.cn
  • 摘要: 在炼钢-连铸生产过程中, 因铁水或废钢供应不及时经常发生钢水在转炉设备上开工延迟, 导致相邻炉次在同一设备上产生作业冲突或同一浇次内的相邻炉次在连铸机上断浇, 使原调度计划失效.由于炼钢-连铸生产存在多台转炉、多台精炼炉和多台连铸机, 以及多重精炼方式且存在着可重入生产情况, 加上要保证已开工和完工炉次按原调度计划执行, 使得已有炼钢-连铸生产重调度方法难以适用.本文建立了开工时间延迟下的炼钢-连铸生产重调度模型, 将模型分解和启发式方法相结合, 提出了由炉次加工设备指派和作业时间决策组成的启发式重调度方法.通过实际工业数据仿真实验和在某大型钢铁企业的炼钢-连铸生产重调度的工业应用表明所提出的重调度方法显著减少了炉次加工冗余等待时间.
  • 图  1  中国某炼钢厂的生产工艺过程

    Fig.  1  Production process of steelmaking and continuous casting

    图  2  炼钢–连铸生产调度计划甘特图

    Fig.  2  Gantt graph of production plan

    图  3  开工时间延迟扰动下的炼钢–连铸生产重调度策略

    Fig.  3  Rescheduling strategy for the steelmaking and continuous casting

    图  4  炉次设备决策变量求解

    Fig.  4  Solving the decision variables of charge equipment

    图  5  炉次作业时间决策变量求解

    Fig.  5  Solving the decision variables of working time of charges

    图  6  处于加工状态的炉次作业时间不能冲突约束处理

    Fig.  6  Handling conflict time for charges being processed

    图  7  未开工炉次作业时间不能冲突约束处理

    Fig.  7  Handling conflict time for nor started charges

    图  8  连续浇铸约束处理

    Fig.  8  Continuous casting constraint processing

    图  9  不同重调度方法的平均目标值

    Fig.  9  Average objective values of rescheduling methods

    图  10  仿真参数变化时对启发式方法H11等待时间的影响

    Fig.  10  Average objective values of H11 method

    图  11  不同重调度方法的指标比较

    Fig.  11  Index comparison of different methods

    图  12  不同重调度方法的设备负荷均衡率比较

    Fig.  12  Comparison of load balancing rate of equipment for methods

    图  13  炼钢–连铸生产重调度方法的工业应用

    Fig.  13  Industrial application of the proposed method

    表  1  各种重调度方法

    Table  1  Rescheduling methods

    序号 重调度排序 指派规则优先级 重调度方法
    1 Seq1 Assign1 H11
    2 Seq1 Assign2 H12
    3 Seq1 Assign3 H13
    4 Seq1 Assign4 H14
    5 Seq1 Assign5 H15
    6 Seq1 Assign6 H16
    7 Seq2 Assign1 H21
    8 Seq2 Assign2 H22
    9 Seq2 Assign3 H23
    10 Seq2 Assign4 H24
    11 Seq2 Assign5 H25
    12 Seq2 Assign6 H26
    13 Seq3 Assign1 H31
    14 Seq3 Assign2 H32
    15 Seq3 Assign3 H33
    16 Seq3 Assign4 H34
    17 Seq3 Assign5 H35
    18 Seq3 Assign6 H36
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  各种启发式方法的RPI值

    Table  2  RPI values of rescheduling methods

    问题 参数 H11 H12 H13 H14 H15 H16 H21 H22 H23 H24 H25 H26 H31 H32 H33 H34 H35 H36
    P1 $C_{1}=1$ 2 3 322 327 33 41 0 0 132 134 2 3 2 2 132 140 7 10
    P2 $C_{1}=2$ 4 13 102 010 101 702 186 270 6 5 88 560 88 515 6 13 10 15 88 386 88 847 54 51
    P3 $C_{1}=3$ 30 71 877 070 875 109 422 522 19 20 819 627 819 112 26 37 30 27 820 876 819 229 96 98
    P4 $C_{2}=1$ 12 65 744 525 735 497 800 818 0 0 694 356 693 395 12 28 12 21 695 642 693 220 188 190
    P5 $C_{2}=2$ 45 77 885 908 887 138 244 542 0 0 817 767 817 774 3 17 24 26 818 366 818 702 44 43
    P6 $C_{2}=3$ 1 1 242 279 5 5 8 12 230 249 2 2 18 6 125 247 2 3
    P7 $C_{2}=4$ 1 1 1 111 1 106 13 16 21 16 1 015 1 020 23 25 9 10 1 016 1 024 16 15
    P8 $C_{2}=5$ 0 1 553 542 6 7 15 15 497 497 16 18 8 9 508 501 11 14
    P9 $C_{3}=1$ 29 58 694 030 693 295 303 417 19 19 654 301 654 034 11 22 28 28 654 200 653 089 99 97
    P10 $C_{3}=2$ 6 25 272 029 270 402 242 313 6 6 244 777 244 773 10 17 12 15 245 962 245 842 48 53
    P11 $C_{3}=3$ 1 5 13 345 13 440 96 104 0 0 9 241 9 254 13 15 1 1 9 232 9 248 10 9
    P12 $C_{4}=1$ 2 1 544 354 541 868 464 477 9 10 504 493 504 403 12 15 6 5 505 085 504 079 115 113
    P13 $C_{4}=2$ 33 84 386 237 386 413 117 257 9 7 358 574 357 953 13 21 23 30 359 090 358 857 27 25
    P14 $C_{4}=3$ 1 2 48 812 48 857 60 99 7 9 45 253 45 404 9 18 13 9 45 219 45 280 15 22
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Ouelhadj D, Petrovic S. A survey of dynamic scheduling in manufacturing systems. Journal of Scheduling, 2009, 12(4):417-431 doi: 10.1007/s10951-008-0090-8
    [2] Abumaizar R J, Svestka J A. Rescheduling job shops under random disruptions. International Journal of Production Research, 1997, 35(7):2065-2082 doi: 10.1080/002075497195074
    [3] Sanmartí E, Espuña A, Puigianer L. Batch production and preventive maintenance scheduling under equipment failure uncertainty. Computer and Chemical Engineering, 1997, 21(10):1157-1168 doi: 10.1016/S0098-1354(96)00327-4
    [4] Vieira G E, Herrmann J W, Lin E. Analytical models to predict the performance of a single-machine system under periodic and event-driven rescheduling strategies. International Journal of Production Research, 2000, 38(8):1899-1915 doi: 10.1080/002075400188654
    [5] Roy R, Adesola B A, Thornton S. Development of a knowledge model for managing schedule disturbance in steel-making. International Journal of Production Research, 2004, 42(18):3975-3994 doi: 10.1080/00207540410001716453
    [6] Dorn J. Case-based Reactive Scheduling. London, UK:Chapman & Hall, 1994. 32-50
    [7] Dorn J. Cooperating scheduling systems. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, 2001, 3(6):570-585 doi: 10.1504/IJMTM.2001.001430
    [8] Dorn J, Kerr R, Thalhammer G. Reactive scheduling:improving the robustness of schedules and restricting the effects of shop floor disturbances by fuzzy reasoning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 1995, 42(6):687-704 doi: 10.1006/ijhc.1995.1031
    [9] Ouelhadj D, Cowling P I, Petrovic S. Utility and stability measures for agent-based dynamic scheduling of steel continuous casting. In:Proceeding of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation. Taipei, China:IEEE, 2003. 175-180
    [10] Ouelhadj D, Petrovic S, Cowling P I, Meisels A. Inter-agent cooperation and communication for agent-based robust dynamic scheduling in steel production. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2004, 18(3):161-172 doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2004.10.003
    [11] Guo D F, Li T K. Rescheduling algorithm for steelmaking-continuous casting. In:Proceeding of the 2nd IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications. Harbin, China:IEEE, 2007. 1421-1425
    [12] Li T K, Guo D F. Constraint-based approach for steelmaking-continuous casting rescheduling. In:Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Industrial, Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems. Kyoto, Japan:Springer, 2007. 1108-1117
    [13] Zhang C S, Li T K, Wang B L, Zhang W X, Sun B. Dynamic modeling method for the scheduling problem in steelmaking-continuous casting with disturbance of product quality. Energy Procedia, 2011, 13:253-261 doi: 10.1016/S1876-6102(14)00454-8
    [14] Worapradya K, Buranathiti T. Production rescheduling based on stability under uncertainty for continuous slab casting. In:Proceedings of ASIMMOD 2009. Bangkok, Thailand, 2009. 170-176
    [15] Ozoe Y, Konishi M. Agent based scheduling of steel making processes. In:Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control. Okayama, Japan:IEEE, 2009. 278-281
    [16] Chen K, Zheng Z, Liu Y, Gao X Q. Real-time scheduling method for steelmaking-continuous casting. In:Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. Macao, China:IEEE, 2010. 2366-2370
    [17] Mao K, Pan Q K, Pang X F, Chai T Y. An effective Lagrangian relaxation approach for rescheduling a steelmaking-continuous casting process. Control Engineering Practice, 2014, 30:66-77
    [18] Mao K, Pan Q K, Pang X F, Chai T Y. A novel Lagrangian relaxation approach for a hybrid flowshop scheduling problem in the steelmaking-continuous casting process. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 236(1):51-60 doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.11.010
    [19] Tang L X, Zhao Y, Liu J Y. An improved differential evolution algorithm for practical dynamic scheduling in steelmaking-continuous casting production. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2014, 18(2):209-25 doi: 10.1109/TEVC.2013.2250977
    [20] Kumar P R. Re-entrant lines. Queueing Systems, 1993, 13(1-3):87-110 doi: 10.1007/BF01158930
    [21] 俞胜平, 郑秉霖, 柴天佑.炼钢连铸混合智能调度方法及其应用.华东理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 32(7):844-848 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLDX200607024.htm

    Yu Sheng-Ping, Zheng Bing-Lin, Chai Tian-You. Hybrid intelligent scheduling method and its application for steelmaking and continuous casting. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2006, 32(7):844-848 http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLDX200607024.htm
    [22] Pang X F, Yu S P, Zheng B L, Chai T Y. Complete modification rescheduling method and its application for steelmaking and continuous casting. In:Proceedings of the 17th IFAC World Congress. Seoul, Korea:IFAC, 2008. 12837-12842
  • 加载中
图(13) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2480
  • HTML全文浏览量:  146
  • PDF下载量:  1020
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-04-10
  • 录用日期:  2015-12-21
  • 刊出日期:  2016-03-01

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回