离散线性一致性算法噪声问题研究

窦全胜; 丛玲; 姜平; 史忠植

doi:10.16383/j.aas.2015.c140698

离散线性一致性算法噪声问题研究

doi: 10.16383/j.aas.2015.c140698

窦全胜^1,2,3,
丛玲^1,2,
姜平^1,2,
史忠植³

1.
山东工商学院计算机与技术学院烟台 264005;
2.
山东省高校智能信息处理重点实验室(山东工商学院) 烟台 264005;
3.
中国科学院计算技术研究所北京 100190

基金项目:

图家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划) (2013CB329502),国家自然科学基金(61272244, 611750532, 61173173, 61035003, 61202212)资助

详细信息

作者简介:
丛玲山东师范大学信息科学与工程学院硕士研究生. 主要研究方向为群体智能. E-mail: clfighting@sina.com

计量
- 文章访问数: 1749
- HTML全文浏览量: 106
- PDF下载量: 1134
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2014-10-09
- 修回日期: 2015-02-02
- 刊出日期: 2015-07-20

Research on Discrete Linear Consensus Algorithm with Noises

1.
School of Computer Science and Technology, Shandong Institute of Business and Technology, Yantai 264005;
2.
Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing in Universities of Shandong, Yantai 264005;
3.
Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190

Funds:

Supported by National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (2013CB329502) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (61272244, 611750532, 61173173, 61035003, 612 02212)

摘要

摘要: 多智能体一致性问题在传感网、社交网、协同控制等诸多领域有着广泛的实际应用背景, 本文对离散线性一致性算法的噪声问题进行了研究, 证明了离散线性一致性算法的噪声不可控性; 提出基于抑噪算子ε(t)的噪声控制策略, 指出当ε(t)为t-0.5的高阶无穷小时, 抑噪后的一致性算法噪声可控; 分析了抑噪算子对一致性算法收敛性的影响, 证明了在无噪声条件下, 当抑噪算子ε(t为t-1的低阶无穷小时, 抑噪后的一致性算法依然可以使Agent收敛至原收敛状态x*.在上述结论基础上进一步指出, 当t→∞ 时, 若抑噪算子ε(t)的阶在t-0.5~t-1之间, 所有Agent 的状态将以原收敛状态x* 为中心呈正态分布. 最后, 以DHA 为例对相应理论结果进行了验证和讨论. 本文为线性一致性算法的噪声控制提供了理论依据, 对抑噪算s子的确定有较强的指导意义.
- 集群智能 /
- 多智能体系统 /
- 一致性算法 /
- 噪声
Abstract: Consensus problem in multi-agent system has a wide application background in many fields, such as sensor networks, social networks, cooperative control and so on. In this paper, we address the problem of the discrete linear consensus algorithm with noise, and point out that the noise of discrete linear consistency algorithm is not controllable. Aiming at this problem, we propose a strategy using noise suppression operator ε(t) to control noise, and point out that when ε(t) is the higher-order infinitesimal of t-0.5, the noise of consistency algorithm after noise suppression is controllable. We analyze the effect of suppression operator on the convergence of consistency algorithm and prove that under the condition of no noise and if the suppression operator ε(t) is a lower-order infinitesimal of t-1, the consistency algorithm after noise suppression can still converge to the original convergence state x*. Based on this, we further point out that if the order of ε(t is between the orders of t-0.5 and t-1 when t→∞,the states of all the agents will be a normal distribution with its center at the original convergence state x* in the end. And, by using DHA as an example, we verify and discuss the corresponding theoretical results. This paper provides a theoretical foundation for noise control of linear consensus algorithm, and has a strong directional effect on the determination of noise suppression operator.
- Collective intelligence /
- multi-agents system /
- consensus algorithms /
- noises

HTML全文

参考文献(27)

[1]	Reynolds C W. Flocks, herds and schools: a distributed behavioral model. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques. New York, USA: ACM, 1987. 25-34
[2]	Vicsek T, Czirok A, Ben-Jacob E, Cohen I, Shochet O. Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. Physical Review Letters, 1995, 75(6): 1226-1229
[3]	Jadbabaie A, Lin J, Morse A S. Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2003, 48(6): 988 -1001
[4]	Benediktsson J A, Swain P H. Consensus theoretic classification methods. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, 1992, 22(4): 688-704
[5]	Moreau L. Stability of multiagent systems with time-dependent communication links. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2005, 50(2): 169-182
[6]	Li Z K, Duan Z S, Chen G R, Huang L. Consensus of multiagent systems and synchronization of complex networks: a unified viewpoint. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 2010, 57(1): 213-224
[7]	Li Z, Duan Z, Chen G. Dynamic consensus of linear multi-agent systems. IET Control Theory and Applications, 2011, 5(1): 19-28
[8]	Li Z K, Liu X D, Ren W, Xie L H. Distributed tracking control for linear multiagent systems with a leader of bounded unknown input. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2013, 58(2): 518-523
[9]	Wen G H, Duan Z S, Li Z K, Chen G R. Consensus and its L2-gain performance of multi-agent systems with intermittent information transmissions. International Journal of Control, 2012, 85(4): 384-396
[10]	Wen G H, Duan Z S, Li Z K, Chen G R. Flocking of multi-agent dynamical systems with intermittent nonlinear velocity measurements. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 2012, 22(16): 1790-1805
[11]	Olfati-Saber R, Fax J A, Murray R M. Consensus and cooperation in networked multi-agent systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2007, 95(1): 215-233
[12]	Olfati-Saber R. Evolutionary dynamics of behavior in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. New Orleans, LA: IEEE, 2007. 4051-4056
[13]	Olfati-Saber R, Jalalkamali P. Coupled distributed estimation and control for mobile sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2012, 57(10): 2609-2614
[14]	Olfati-Saber R. Flocking for multi-agent dynamic systems: algorithms and theory. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2006, 51(3): 401-420
[15]	Yu C H, Nagpal R. A self-adaptive framework for modular robots in a dynamic environment: theory and applications. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2011, 30(8): 1015-1036
[16]	Yu C H. Biologically-Inspired Control for Self-Adaptive Multiagent Systems [Ph.D. dissertation], Harvard University, USA, 2010.
[17]	Yu C H, Nagpal R. Biologically-inspired control for multi-agent self-adaptive tasks. In: Proceedings of the 24th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Atlanta: AAAI, 2010. 1702-1709
[18]	Tran T M D, Kibangou A Y. Distributed design of finite-time average consensus protocols. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IFAC Workshop on Distributed Estimation and Control in Networked Systems. Rhine Moselle Hall, Koblenz, Germany: IFAC, 2013. 227-233
[19]	Wen G G, Penga Z X, Rahmania A, Yu Y G. Distributed leader-following consensus for second-order multi-agent systems with nonlinear inherent dynamics. International Journal of Systems Science, 2014, 45(9): 1892-1901
[20]	Wen G G, Yu Y G, Peng Z X, Rahmani A. Distributed consensus tracking for second-order nonlinear multiagent systems with a specified reference state. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, 2014: Article ID 320687, doi: 10.1155/2014/320687
[21]	Lu X Q, Lu R Q, Chen S H, Lu J H. Finite-time distributed tracking control for multi-agent systems with a virtual leader. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 2013, 60(2) 352-362
[22]	Busoniu L, Morarescu I C. Consensus for agents with general dynamics using optimistic optimization. In: Proceedings of the 52nd IEEE Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC-13). Florence, Italy: IEEE, 2013. 6735-6740
[23]	Long Y S, Liu S, Xie L H. Distributed consensus of discrete-time multi-agent systems with multiplicative noises. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 2014, doi: 10.1002/rnc.3253
[24]	Min Hai-Bo, Liu Yuan, Wang Shi-Cheng, Sun Fu-Chun. An overview on coordination control problem of multi-agent system. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2012, 38(10): 1557-1570(闵海波, 刘源, 王仕成, 孙富春. 多个体协调控制问题综述. 自动化学报, 2012, 38(10): 1557-1570)
[25]	Sun Y G. Mean square consensus for uncertain multiagent systems with noises and delays. Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2012, 2012: Article ID 621060, doi: 10.1155/2012/ 621060
[26]	Huang M Y, Manton J H. Stochastic approximation for consensus seeking: mean square and almost sure convergence. In: Proceedings of the 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. New Orleans LA: IEEE, 2007. 306-311
[27]	Huang M Y, Manton J H. Stochastic consensus seeking with noisy and directed inter-agent communication: fixed and randomly varying topologies. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2010, 55(1): 235-241